Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 279-309

  Woo, Matsuko Mukumoto ^a   Chu, Samuel Kai Wah ^a   Li, Xuanxi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Collaborative writing; L2 writing; Peer feedback; Primary school; Revision; Wikis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875440405     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-012-9285-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in Wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431-448.
2. Barton, D. M., & Heiman, J. R. (2012). Process, product, and potnetial: The archaeological assessment of collaborative, wiki-based student projects in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 46-60.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Berg, C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.
5. Bureau, Education. (2007). Consultation document on the third strategy on information technology in education: Right technology at the right time for right task. Hong Kong: Government of HKSAR.
6. Chu, S. K. W. (2008). TWiki for knowledge building and management. Online Information Review, 32(6), 745-758.
7. Chu, S. K. W., Tavares, N. J., Chu, D., Ho, S. Y., Chow, K., Siu, F. L. C., et al. (2012). Developing upper primary students' 21 century skills: inquiry learning through collaborative teaching and Web 2. 0 technology. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.
8. Coyle, J. E., Jr. (2007). Wikis in the college classroom: A comparative study of online and face-to-face group collaboration at a private liberal arts university. Unpublished Ph. D., Ohio: Kent State University.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
10. Engstrom, M. E., & Jewett, D. (2005). Collaborative learning the Wiki way. TechTrends, 49(6), 12.
11. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing Revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400-414.
12. Fitzgerald, J., & Markham, L. R. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction, 4(1), 3-24.
13. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: a meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1-51.
14. Goodwin-Jones, B. (2003). Blogs and wikis: environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12.
15. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The Role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3-12.
16. Guzdial, M., Rick, J., & Kehoe, C. (2001). Beyond adoption to invention: teacher-created collaborative activities in higher education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 265-279.
17. HKCECES. (2008). Specific Guidelines for English Language Primary 4-5 Levels.
18. Honjegger, B. D. (2005). Wikis-a rapidly growing phenomenon in the German-speaking school community. San Diego: WikiSym.
19. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Jones, J. (2008). Patterns of revision in online writing: a study of Wikipedia's featured articles. Written Communication, 25(2), 262-289.
21. Jones, D. C., Abbey, B. B., & Cumberland, A. (1998). The development of display rule knowledge: linkages with family expressiveness and social competence. Child Development, 69, 1209-1222.
22. Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, C. S. D., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1-23.
23. Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in Wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning and Technology, 13(1), 70-95.
24. Kutnick, P., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2008). Improving theeffects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction, 18, 83-95.
25. Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193-227.
26. Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students' engagement and motivation in writing: the case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 219-237.
27. MacArthur, C. A. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 93-103.
28. Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36, 437-455.
29. Manion, C. E., & Selfe, R. D. (2012). Sharing an assessment ecology: digital media, wikis, and social work of knowledge. Technical Communication, 21(1), 25-45.
30. Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
31. Nicol, D., Littlejohn, A., & Grierson, H. (2005). The importance of structuring information and resources within shared workspaces during collaborative design learning. Open Learning, 20(1), 31-49.
32. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
33. Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 87-100.
34. Raman, M., Ryan, T., & Olfman, L. (2005). Designing knowledge management systems for teaching and learning with wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 311-320.
35. Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
36. Richardson, W. (2010). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
37. Sun, I. K. Y. (2006). A case study of the impact of using online blogs for peer feedback in a class of Form Two students in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
38. Tompkins, G. E. (2004). Teaching writing: balancing process and product (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
39. Tompkins, G. E. (2010). Literacy for the 21st century: a balanced approach (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43-55.
41. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.
42. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
43. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.