Scenario methodology: New developments in theory and practice. Introduction to the Special Issue

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 561-565

  Wright, George ^a   Cairns, George ^b   Bradfield, Ron ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875379339     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.011     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Warth Johannes, von der Gracht Heiko A., Darkow Inga-Lena A dissent-based approach for multi-stakeholder scenario development - The future of electric drive vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:566--583.
2. Pincombe B, Blunden S, Pincombe A, Dexter P Ascertaining a hierarchy of dimensions from time-poor experts: linking tactical vignettes to strategic scenarios. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:584--598.
3. von der Gracht Heiko A., Stillings Christopher An innovation-focused scenario process - A case from the materials producing industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:599--610.
4. Varho Vilja, Tapio Petri Combining the qualitative and quantitative with the Q2 scenario technique - The case of transport and climate. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:611--630.
5. Wright G, Bradfield R, Cairns G Does the intuitive logics method - and its recent enhancements - produce "effective" scenarios?. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:631--642.
6. O'Brien F.A., Meadows M Scenario orientation and use to support strategy development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:643--656.
7. Ram C, Montibeller G Exploring the impact of evaluating strategic options in a scenario-based multi-criteria framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:657--672.
8. MacKay B, Tambeau P A structuration approach to scenario praxis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:673--686.
9. Hughes N Towards improving the relevance of scenarios for public policy questions: a proposed methodological framework for policy relevant low carbon scenarios. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:687--698.
10. Wilkinson A, Kupers R, Mangalagiu D How plausibility-based scenario practices are grappling with complexity to appreciate and address 21st century challenges, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 80:699--710.
11. Andreescu L, Gheorghiu R, Zulean M, Curaj A Understanding normative foresight outcomes: scenario development and the 'veil of ignorance' effect. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:711--722.
12. Alberto Franco L., Meadows M, Armstrong S.J. Exploring individual differences in scenario planning workshops: a cognitive style framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:723--734.
13. Bowman G, Bradley MacKay R., Masrani S, McKiernan P Storytelling and the scenario process: understanding success and failure. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:735--748.
14. Dong C, Schoups G, van de Giesen N Scenario development for water resource planning and management: a review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:749--761.
15. Dermawan A, Kemp-Benedict E, Huber-Lee A, Fencl A Testing a multi-scale scenario approach for smallholder tree plantations in Indonesia and Vietnam. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:762--771.
16. Önkal D, Zeynep Sayim K, Sinan Gönül M Scenarios as channels of forecast advice. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:772--788.
17. Kwakkel J.H., Auping W.L., Pruyt E Dynamic scenario discovery under deep uncertainty: the future of copper. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:789--800.
18. Meissner P, Wulf T Cognitive benefits of scenario planning: its impact on biases and decision quality. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:801--814.
19. Schoemaker P J.H., Day G.S., Snyder S.A. Integrating organizational networks, weak signals, strategic radars and scenario planning. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:815--824.
20. Ramírez R, Österman R, Grönquist D Scenarios and early warnings as dynamic capabilities to frame managerial attention. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:825--838.