Return of function after hair cell regeneration

Hearing Research

Volumn 297, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-120

  Ryals, Brenda M ^a   Dent, Micheal L ^b   Dooling, Robert J ^c  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KANAMYCIN;

ACOUSTICS; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CANARY; CELL LOSS; CELL REGENERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; DRUG EFFECT; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOXICITY TESTING; VOCALIZATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIRDS; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; LEARNING; NERVE REGENERATION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84875378945     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.019     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Battey J.F. Human hereditary hearing impairment: research progress fueled by the human genome project and mouse models. Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research 2001, 391-400. CRC Press, New York. J.F. Willott (Ed.).
2. Brittan-Powell E.F., Dooling R.J., Ryals B.M., Gleich O. Electrophysiological and morphological development of the inner ear in Belgian Waterslager canaries. Hear. Res. 2010, 269:56-69.
3. Chen L., Sun W., Salvi R.J. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from the chicken ear. Hear. Res. 2001, 161(1-2):54-64.
4. Corwin J.T., Cotanche D.A. Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma. Science 1988, 240:1772-1774.
5. Cotanche D.A. Structural recovery from sound and aminoglycoside damage in the avian cochlea. Audiol. Neuro. Otol. 1999, 4:271-285.
6. Cruz R.M., Lambert P.M., Rubel E.W. Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1987, 113:1058-1062.
7. Dooling R.J., Lohr B., Dent M.L. Hearing in birds and reptiles. Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles 2001, 308-359. Springer-Verlag, New York. R.J. Dooling, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
8. Dooling R.J. Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars. Exp. Biol. 1986, 45:195-218.
9. Dooling R.J., Okanoya K. The method of constant stimuli in testing auditory sensitivity in small birds. Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics 1995, 161-169. Birkhauser-Verlag, Switzerland. G.M. Klump, R.J. Dooling, R.R. Fay, W.C. Stebbins (Eds.).
10. Dooling R.J., Ryals B.M., Manabe K. Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair cell regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997, 94:14206-14210.
11. Dooling R.J., Ryals B.M., Dent M.L., Reid T.L. Perception of complex sounds in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) with temporary hearing loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 119:2524-2532.
12. Dooling R.J., Gephart B.F., Price P.H., McHale C., Brauth S.E. Effects of deafening on the contact call of the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35:1264-1266.
13. Dooling R.J., Dent M.L., Lauer A.M., Ryals B.M. Functional recovery following hair cell regeneration in birds. Hair Cell Regeneration, Repair, and Protection 2008, 117-140. Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, New York. R.J. Salvi, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
14. Dooling R.J., Ryals B.M., Presson J. The paradox of the Belgian Waterslager canary: congenital hair cell abnormalities and hearing loss despite post mitotic hair cell replacement. Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing 1998, 145-152. Whurr Publishers, London. A.R. Palmer, E. Rees, A.Q. Summerfield, R. Meddis (Eds.).
15. Duckert L.G., Rubel E.W. Morphological correlates of functional recovery in the chicken inner ear after gentamicin treatment. J. Comp. Neurol. 1993, 331:75-96.
16. Duckert L.G., Rubel E.W. Ultrastructural observations on regenerating hair cells in the chick basilar papilla. Hear. Res. 1990, 42(1-2):175-194.
17. Durham D., Park D.L., Girod D.A. Central nervous system plasticity during hair cell loss and regeneration. Hear. Res. 2000, 147:145-159.
18. Farabaugh S.M., Linzenbold A., Dooling R.J. Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls. J. Comp. Psychol. 1994, 108:81-92.
19. Girod D.A., Tucci D.L., Rubel E.W. Anatomical correlates of functional recovery in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 1991, 101:1139-1149.
20. Gleich O., Klump G.M., Dooling R.J. Hereditary sensorineural hearing loss in a bird. Naturwissenschaften 1994, 81:320-323.
21. Gleich O., Klump G.M., Dooling R.J. Peripheral basis for the auditory deficit in Belgian Waterslager canaries (Serinus canarius). Hear. Res. 1995, 82:100-108.
22. Guttinger H.R. Consequences of domestication on the song structures in the canary. Behaviour 1985, 94:254-278.
23. Hashino E., Sokabe M. Kanamycin induced low-frequency hearing loss in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 85:289-294.
24. Hashino E., Sokabe M., Tanaka R. Function-structure correlation during recovery from aminoglycoside ototoxicity in the avian auditory system. Noise-induced Hearing Loss 1991, 228-236. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis. A.L. Dancer, D. Henderson, R.J. Salvi, R.P. Hammernik (Eds.).
25. He D.Z., Beisel K.W., Chen L., Ding D.L., Jia S., Fritzsch B., Salvi R. Chick hair cells do not exhibit voltage-dependent somatic motility. J. Physiol. 2003, 546(Pt. 2):511-520.
26. Heaton J.T., Dooling R.J., Farabaugh S.M. Effects of deafening on the calls and warble song of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105:2010-2019.
27. Hile A.G., Plummer T.K., Streidter G.F. Male vocal imitation produces call convergence during pair bonding in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Anim. Behav. 2000, 59:1209-1218.
28. Izumikawa M., Minoda R., Kawamoto K., Abrashkin K.A., Swiderski D.L., Dolan D.F., Brough D.E., Raphael Y. Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nat. Med. 2005, 11:271-276.
29. Koppl C. Birds - same thing, but different? Convergent evolution in the avian and mammalian auditory systems provides informative comparative models. Hear. Res. 2011, 273(1-2):65-71.
30. Levic S., Nie L., Tuteja D., Harvey M., Sokolowski B.H., Yamoah E.N. Development and regeneration of hair cells share common functional features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104(48):19108-19113.
31. Lin V., Lee G.S., Rubel E.W., Stone J. Hearing recovery via direct transdifferentiation in an avian model. Assoc. Res. Otol. 2008, abstract 922.
32. Lippe W.R., Westbrook E.W., Ryals B.M. Hair cell regeneration in the chick cochlea following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Hear. Res. 1991, 56:203-210.
33. Manabe K., Sadr E.I., Dooling R.J. Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:1190-1198.
34. Marean G.C., Burt J.M., Beecher M.D., Rubel E.W. Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): recovery of pure-tone detection thresholds. Hear. Res. 1993, 71:125-136.
35. Marean G.C., Burt J.M., Beecher M.D., Rubel E.W. Auditory perception following hair cell regeneration in European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): frequency and temporal resolution. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:3567-3580.
36. Marler P., Waser M.S. Role of auditory feedback in canary song development. J. Compar. Physiol. Psychol. 1977, 91:8-16.
37. Norton S.J., Rubel E.W. Active and passive ADP components in mammalian and avian ears. Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing 1990, 219-226. Springer-Verlag, New York. P. Dallos, C.D. Geisler, J.A. Matthews, M.A. Ruggero, C.R. Steele (Eds.).
38. Okanoya K., Dooling R.J. Colony differences in auditory thresholds in the canary (Serinus canarius). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985, 78:1170-1176.
39. Okanoya K., Dooling R.J. Hearing in Passerine and Psittacine birds: a comparative study of masked and absolute auditory thresholds. J. Comp. Psych. 1987, 101:7-15.
40. Okanoya K., Dooling R.J., Downing J.D. Hearing and vocalizations in hybrid Waterslager-Roller canaries (Serinus canarius). Hear. Res. 1990, 46:271-275.
41. Ryals B.M., Dooling R.J., Westbrook E., Dent M.L., MacKenzie A., Larsen O.N. Avian species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure. Hear. Res. 1999, 131:71-88.
42. Ryals B.M., Rubel E.W. Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult coturnix quail. Science 1988, 240:1774-1776.
43. Saunders S.S., Adler H., Pugliano F. The structural and functional aspects of hair cell regeneration in the chick as a result of exposure to intense sound. Exp. Neurol. 1992, 115:13-17.
44. Saunders J.C., Doan D.E., Cohen Y.E., Adler H.J., Poje C.P. Recent observations on the recovery of structure and function in the sound damaged chick ear. Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration 1996, 62-84. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York. R.J. Salvi, D. Henderson, F. Fiorino, V. Colletti (Eds.).
45. Saunders S.S., Salvi R.J. Recovery of function in the avian auditory system after ototrauma. Hair Cell Regeneration, Repair, and Protection 2008, 77-116. Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, New York. R.J. Salvi, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
46. Shang J., Cafaro J., Nehmer R., Stone J. Supporting cell division is not required for regeneration of auditory hair cells after ototoxic injury in vitro. J. Assoc. Res. Otol. 2010, 11(2-3):222.
47. Smolders J.W. Functional recovery in the avian ear after hair cell regeneration. Audiol. Neurootol. 1999, 4:286-302.
48. Stresemann E. Zur Geschichte eineger Kanarienvogel-Rasen. Ornithol. Mon. Ber. 1923, 31:103-106.
49. Sun W., Chen L., Salvi R.J. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in chickens. Audiol. Neurootol. 2002, 7(4):206-213.
50. Tucci D.L., Rubel E.W. Physiological status of regenerated hair cells in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1990, 103:443-445.
51. Waser M.S., Marler P. Song learning in canaries. J. Compar. Physiological. Psychol. 1977, 91:1-7.
52. Woolley S.M., Rubel E.W. Vocal memory and learning in adult Bengalese Finches with regenerated hair cells. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:7774-7787.
53. Woolley S.M., Wissman A.M., Rubel E.W. Hair cell regeneration and recovery of auditory thresholds following aminoglycoside ototoxicity in Bengalese finches. Hear. Res. 2001, 153:181-195.