Perception of complex sounds in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) with temporary hearing loss

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 2524-2532

  Dooling, Robert J ^a   Ryals, Brenda M ^b   Dent, Micheal L ^a,c   Reid, Tracy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; AUDITION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

HEARING LOSS; KANAMYCIN; SPECIES-SPECIFIC VOCALIZATIONS; VOCAL PRODUCTION;

SPEECH ANALYSIS;

KANAMYCIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIRD; EAR; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NONHUMAN; PARAKEET; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HAIR CELLS; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; KANAMYCIN; MELOPSITTACUS; MENTAL RECALL; NERVE REGENERATION; ORGAN OF CORTI; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 33645330437     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2171839     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beeman, K. (1992). "Signal technology, V2.20.," (Engineering Design, Belmont, MA).
2. Bermingham-McDonogh, O., and Rubel, E. W. (2003). "Hair cell regeneration: Winging our way towards a sound future," Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 119-126.
3. Brittan-Powell, E. F., Dooling, R. J., and Farabaugh, S. M. (1997). "Vocal development in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): contact calls," J. Comp. Psychol. 111, 226-241.
4. Corwin, J. T., and Cotanche, D. A. (1988). "Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma," Science 240, 1772-1774.
5. Cotanche, D. A. (1999). "Structural recovery from sound and aminoglycoside damage in the avian cochlea," Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 4, 271-285.
6. Dooling, R. J. (1986). "Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars," Exp. Biol. 45, 195-218.
7. Dooling, R. J., Gephart, B. F., Price, P. H., McHale, C., and Brauth, S. E. (1987). "Effects of deafening on the contact call of the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus," Anim. Behav. 35, 1264-1266.
8. Dooling, R. J., Brown, S. D., Park, T. J., and Okanoya, K. (1990). "Natural perceptual categories for vocal signals in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)," in Comparative Perception, Complex Signals. Vol. II, edited byW. Stebbins, M. A. Berkley (Wiley, New York).
9. Dooling, R. J., and Okanoya, K. (1995). "The method of constant stimuli in testing auditory sensitivity in small birds," in Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics, edited by G. M. Klump, R. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, and W. C. Stebbins (Birkhauser-Verlag, Switzerland), pp. 161-169.
10. Dooling, R. J., Ryals, B. M., and Manabe, K. (1997). "Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair cell regeneration," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 14206-14210.
11. Farabaugh, S. M., Linzenbold, A., and Dooling, R. J. (1994). "Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls," J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 81-92.
12. Farabaugh, S., and Dooling, R. J. (1996). "Acoustic communication in parrots: Laboratory and field studies of budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus," in Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited byD. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), pp. 97-118.
13. Gleich, O., and Manley, G. A. (1988). "Quantitative morphological analysis of the sensory epithelium of the starling and pigeon basilar papilla," Hear. Res. 34, 69-85.
14. Gleich, O., Manley, G. A. (2000).' "The hearing organ of birds and crocodilia," in: Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles edited byR. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (Springer, New York), pp. 70-138, 2000).'
15. "The hearing organ of birds and crocodilia," in: Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles edited byR. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (Springer, New York), pp. 1139-1149.
16. Hashino, E., and Sokabe, M. (1989). "Kanamycin-induced low-frequency hearing loss in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 289-294.
17. Hashino, E., Sokabe, M., and Tanaka, R. (1991). "Function-structure correlation during recovery from aminoglycoside ototoxicity in the avian auditory system," in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, edited byA. L. Dancer, D. Henderson, R. J. Salvi, and R. P. Hammernik, Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, MO, pp. 228-236.
18. Hashino, E., Tanaka, R., Salvi, R. J., and Sokabe, M. (1992). "Hair cell regeneration in the adult budgerigar after kanamycin ototoxicity," Hear. Res. 59, 46-58.
19. Heaton, J. T., and Brauth, S. E. (1999). "Effects of deafening on the development of nestling and juvenile vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)," J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 314-320.
20. Heaton, J. T., Dooling, R. J., and Farabaugh, S. M. (1999). "Effects of deafening on the calls and warble song of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2010-2019.
21. Hile, A. G., Plummer, T. K., and Streidter, G. F. (2000). "Male vocal imitation produces call convergence during pair bonding in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)," Anim. Behav. 59, 1209-1218.
22. Kroodsma, D. E., and Miller, E. H. (1996). Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York).
23. Lippe, W. R., Westbrook, E. W., and Ryals, B. M. (1991). "Hair cell regeneration in the chick cochlea following aminoglycoside ototoxicity," Hear. Res. 56, 203-210.
24. Manabe, K., Sadr, E. I., and Dooling, R. J. (1998). "Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1190-1198.
25. Marean, G. C., Burt, J. M., Beecher, M. D., and Rubel, E. W. (1993). "Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Recovery of pure-tone detection thresholds," Hear. Res. 71, 125-136.
26. Marean, G. C., Burt, J. M., Beecher, M. D., and Rubel, E. W. (1998). "Auditory perception following hair cell regeneration in European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Frequency and temporal resolution," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3567-3580.
27. Newby, H. A. (1964). Disorders of Hearing; in Audiology (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) pp. 45-53.
28. Niemiec, A. J., Raphael, Y., and Moody, D. B. (1994). "Return of auditory function following structural regeneration after acoustic trauma: Behavioral measures from quail," Hear. Res. 79, 1-16.
29. Okanoya, K., and Dooling, R. J. (1987). "Hearing in Passerine and Psittacine birds: A comparative study of masked and absolute auditory thresholds," J. Comp. Psychol. 101, 7-15.
30. Okanoya, K., and Dooling, R. J. (1991). "Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): Assessing species-specific advantages," J. Comp. Psychol. 105, 60-72.
31. Park, T. J., and Dooling, R. J. (1985). "Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)," J. Comp. Psychol. 99, 391-402.
32. Ryals, B. M., and Rubel, E. W. (1988). "Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult coturnix quail," Science 240, 1774-1776.
33. Ryals, B. M., Dooling, R. J., Westbrook, E., Dent, M. L., MacKenzie, A., and Larsen, O. N. (1999). "Avian species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure," Hear. Res. 131, 71-88.
34. Saunders, S. S., Salvi, R. J., and Miller, K. M. (1995). "Recovery of thresholds and temporal integration in adult chickens after high-level 525-Hz pure-tone exposure," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1150-1164.
35. Saunders, J. C., Doan, D. E., Cohen, Y. E., Adler, H. J., and Poje, C. P. (1996). "Recent observations on the recovery of structure and function in the sound damaged chick ear," in Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration, edited byR. J. Salvi, D. Henderson, F. Fiorino, V. Colletti (Thieme Medical Publishers, New York), pp. 62-84.
36. Shepard, R. N. (1980). "Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering," Science 210, 390-398.
37. Tucci, D. L., and Rubel, E. W. (1990). "Physiological status of regenerated hair cells in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity," Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 103, 443-445.
38. Woolley, S. M., and Rubel, E. W. (1999). "High-frequency auditory feedback is not required for adult song maintenance in Bengalese finches," J. Neurosci. 19, 358-371.
39. Woolley, S. M., Wissman, A. M., and Rubel, E. W. (2001). "Hair cell regeneration and recovery of auditory thresholds following aminoglycoside ototoxicity in Bengalese finches," Hear. Res. 153, 181-195.