Robot-Mediated Interviews - How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Wood, Luke Jai ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a   Rainer, Austen ^a   Robins, Ben ^a   Lehmann, Hagen ^a   Syrdal, Dag Sverre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD ROBOT INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; HUMANOID ROBOT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; INTERVIEW DURATION; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSE TIME; ROBOTIC MEDIATED INTERVIEW; ROBOTICS; SCHOOL CHILD; TIME;

CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84875357570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059448     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Kerepesi A, Kubinyi E, Jonsson GK, Magnusson MS, Miklosi A, (2006) Behavioral comparison of human-animal (dog) and human-robot (AIBO) interactions. Behavioural Processes 73: 92-99.
2. Melson GF, Kahn PHJ, Beck A, Friedman B, Roberts T, et al. (2009) Children's behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30: 92-102.
3. Barlett B, Estivill-Castro V, Seymon S (2004) Dogs or robots-Why do children see them as robotic pets rather than canine machines? 5th Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC2004). Dunedin.
4. Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H, (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction. 19: 61-84.
5. Tanaka F, Ghosh M (2011) The implementation of care-receiving robot at an English learning school for children; 2011 March 6-9; Lausanne, Switzerland.
6. Saldien J, Goris K, Lefeber D (2006) ANTY: the Development of an Intelligent Huggable Robot for Hospitalized Children. CLAWAR.
7. Saldien J, Goris K, Yilmazyildiz S, Verhelst W, Lefeber D, (2008) On the design of the huggable robot probo. Journal of Physical Agents 2: 3-12.
8. Goris K, Saldien J, Lefeber D (2009) Probo: a testbed for human robot interaction; 2009 March 11-13; La Jolla, California, USA.
9. Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL, Walters ML, Robins B, Kose-Bagci H, et al. (2009) KASPAR: A minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6: 369-397.
10. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2009) From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot; 2009 February 1-7; Cancun, Mexico. IEEE Computer Society Press. pp. 205-211.
11. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL, Mirza NA, Francois D, et al. (2005) Sustaining interaction dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: Lessons learnt from an exploratory study; 2005.
12. Kozima H, Michalowski M, Nakagawa C, (2009) Keepon: A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics 1: 3-18.
13. Dautenhahn K, (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362: 679-704.
14. Kose-Bagci H, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL, (2009) Effects of Embodiment and Gestures on Social Interaction in Drumming Games with a Humanoid Robot. Advanced Robotics 23: 1951-1996.
15. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Nehaniv CL (2008) Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: a user study on interaction kinesics; 2008. ACM. pp. 17-24.
16. Wainer J, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, (2010) Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism; 2010 6-8 Dec. 2010pp.: 631-638.
17. Docherty S, Sandelowski M, (1999) Focus on Qualitative Methods Interviewing Children. Research in Nursing & Health 22: 177-185.
18. UK Government (2007) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. pp. 1-34.
19. Spratling R, Coke S, Minick P (2010) Qualitative data collection with children. Applied Nursing Research.
20. Roebers CM, Schneider W, (2002) Stability and consistency of children's event recall. Cognitive Development 17: 1085-1103.
21. Bethel CL, Stevenson MR, Scassellati B (2011) Sharing a Secret: Interactions Between a Child, Robot, and Adult; 2011; Lausanne, Switzerland.
22. NAO Robot (2011) Aldebaran Robotics. Available: http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/. Accessed 2011 Dec 27.
23. Berlyn DE, (1958) The influence of complexity and novelty in figures on orienting responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55: 289-296.
24. Scheef M, Pinto J, Rahardja K, Snibbe S, Tow R, (2002) Experiences with Sparky, a social robot. Socially Intelligent Agents, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, And Simulated Organizations 3: 173-180.
25. Fior M, Nugent S, Beran TN, Ramirez-Serrano A, Kuzyk R (2010) Children's Relationships with Robots: Robot is Child's New Friend. Journal of Physical Agents 4.
26. Nishio S, Ishiguro H, Anderson M, Hagita N (2007) Representing Personal Presence with a Teleoperated Android: A Case Study with Family. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
27. MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H, (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies 7: 297-337.
28. Becker-Asano C, Ogawa K, Nishio S, Ishiguro H, (2010) Exploring the uncanny valley with Geminoid HI-1 in a real-world application. 2010pp.: 121-128.
29. Shahid S, Krahmer E, Swerts M (2010) Playing with iCat: investigating children's appreciation of game plays with a social robot; 2010 17-NOV; Taipei, Taiwan.
30. Shahid S, Krahmer E, Swerts M, Mubin O (2010) Child-robot interaction during collaborative game play: effects of age and gender on emotion and experience; 2010 November 22-26; Brisbane, Australia.
31. Leite I, Martinho C, Pereira A, Paiva A (2008) iCat: an Affective Game Buddy Based on Anticipatory Mechanisms (Short Paper); 2008 May 12-16; Estoril, Portugal. pp. 1229-1232.
32. Shahid S, Krahmer E, Swerts M (2011) Child-robot Interaction: Playing Alone or Together. CHI 2011. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
33. UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System.
34. Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL, (2010) Drum-mate: interaction dynamics and gestures in human-humanoid drumming experiments. Connection Science 22: 103-134.
35. Robins B, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K (2008) Developing Scenarios for Robot Assisted Play. 17th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication- RO-MAN 2008, Munich, Germany, 1-3 August. pp. 180-186.
36. Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2007) Drum-mate: A Human-Humanoid Drumming Experience; 2007 November 29-December 1; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
37. Gould JD, Conti J, Hovanyecz T, (1983) Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter. Commun ACM 26: 295-308.
38. Dahlbäck N, Jönsson A, Ahrenberg L, (1993) Wizard of Oz studies - why and how. Knowledge-Based Systems 6: 258-266.
39. Green A, Huttenrauch H, Eklundh KS (2004) Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration; 2004. IEEE. pp. 575-580.
40. Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Koay KL, (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots 24: 159-178.
41. Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation; 2003. IEEE. pp. 55-60.
42. UK Government (2007) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. 27.
43. UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. 49, 56, 229.
44. Observer XT (2011) Noldus. Available: http://www.noldus.com/. Accessed 2011 Dec 28.
45. Landis JR, Koch GG, (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
46. Woods S, Dautenhahn K, Kaouri C, te Boekhorst R, Koay KL, et al. (2007) Are robots like people?: Relationships between participant and robot personality traits in humanrobot interaction studies. Interaction Studies 8: 281-305.
47. Tapus A, Ţǎpuş C, Matarić MJ, (2008) User-robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intelligent Service Robotics 1: 169-183.
48. UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. pp. 196.
49. UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. pp. 66.
50. UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures. Home Office Criminal Justice System. pp. 56.
51. Boomer DS, (1965) Hesitation and grammatical encoding. Language and speech 8: 148-158.
52. Shriberg EE, Lickley RJ (1992) Intonation of clause-internal filled pauses; 1992.
53. Brennan SE, Schober MF, (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 274-296.
54. Clark HH, Brennan SE, (1991) Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition 13: 127-149.
55. Clark HH, (1994) Managing problems in speaking. Speech communication 15: 243-250.
56. Brennan SE, Williams M, (1995) The Feeling of Another's Knowing: Prosody and Filled Pauses as Cues to Listeners about the Metacognitive States of Speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 383-398.
57. Smith VL, Clark HH, (1993) On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 25-25.
58. Mahl GF (1987) Explorations in nonverbal and vocal behavior: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.