Review of screening systems for prioritizing chemical substances

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1011-1041

  Bu, Qingwei ^a   Wang, Donghong ^a   Wang, Zijian ^a  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

ecological impact; exposure characterization; human health impact; multiresidue method; priority pollutants; risk assessment of chemicals; screening systems

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS; HUMAN HEALTH IMPACTS; MULTIRESIDUE METHOD; PRIORITY POLLUTANTS; SCREENING SYSTEM;

CHARACTERIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

HEALTH RISKS;

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL; ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; BENZIMIDAZOLE; BROMINE DERIVATIVE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CHLORINE DERIVATIVE; CHLOROBENZENE; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; GROUND WATER; ORGANOBROMINE DERIVATIVE; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDE; PESTICIDE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZODIOXIN; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURAN; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; PYRETHRIN; SURFACE WATER; VETERINARY DRUG;

BENCHMARKING; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH RISK; LITERATURE REVIEW; PRIORITIZATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL FOOD; AQUACULTURE; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CARCINOGENICITY; CEREAL; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DANGEROUS GOODS; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EGG; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; FISH; FOOD; FRUIT; GENOTOXICITY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; HONEY; HUMAN; LD 50; MEAT; MILK; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; ORGANIC POLLUTION; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PARTICULATE MATTER; PHOTODEGRADATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; SCREENING TEST; VEGETABLE; WASTE MINIMIZATION; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84875337551     PISSN: 10643389     EISSN: 15476537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2011.627030     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Chemical Abstract Service. (2013). CHEMLIST (Regulated Chemicals Listing). Retrieved from http://www.cas.org/expertise/cascontent/regulated/ index.html.
2. European Chemical Bureau. (2006). European chemical substances information system. Ispra, Italy: European Chemical Bureau, European Commission.
3. Bowes, M., Brown, M., Rivas, Y., Butler, D., and Zeiger, E. (1995). Introduction and executie summary, in Screening and testing chemicals in commerce. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
4. Muir, D. C. G., and Howard, P. H. (2006). Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 7157.
5. Hansen, B. G., van Haelst, A. G., van Leeuwen, K., and van de Zandt, P. (1999). Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 772.
6. Van Haelst, A. G., and Hansen, B. G. (2000). Priority setting for existing chemicals: Automated data selection routine. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 2372.
7. Klein, W., Denzer, S., Herrchen, M., Lepper, P., Müller, M., Sehrt, R., Storm, A., and Volmer, J. (1999). Revised proposal for a list of priority substances in the context of theWater Frame Directive (COMMPS procedure). Schmallenberg, Germany: Fraunhofer-Institut, Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie.
8. Lerche, D., Sørensen, P. B., Larsen, H. S., Carlsen, L., and Nielsen, O. J. (2002). Comparison of the combined monitoring-based and modelling-based priority setting scheme with partial order theory and random linear extensions for ranking of chemical substances. Chemosphere, 49, 637.
9. Pavan, M., and Worth, A. (2007). Comparison of the COMMPS priority setting scheme with total and partial algorithms for ranking of chemical substances. Ispra, Italy: European Chemicals Bureau.
10. Davis, G. A., Kincaid, L. E., Swanson, M. B., Schultz, T. W., Bartmess, J. E., Griffith, B., and Jones, S. L. (1994). Chemical hazard evaluation for management strategies: A method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
11. Swanson, M. B., Davis, G. A., Kincaid, L. E., Schultz, T. W., Bartmess, J. E., Jones, S. L., and George, E. L. (1997). A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16, 372.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Fact sheet: Final third drinking water Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 3). Washington, DC: Office of Water.
13. Gustafson, D. I. (1989). Groundwater ubiquity score: A simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 8, 339.
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). User's manual for RSEI version 2.2.0 [1996-2006 TRI data]. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, USEPA.
15. Clean Manufacturing Technology Institute. (2002). Indiana relative chemical hazard score (IRCHS). Retrieved from https://engineering.purdue.du/ CMTI/IRCHS/.
16. Breton, R., and Chénier, R. (2000). Environmental categorization and screening of the Canadian Domestic Substances List, in Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals II. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
17. Environment Canada. (2003). Guidance manual for the categorization of organic and inorganic substances on Canada's Domestic Substances List. Quebec, Canada: Existing Substances Branch, Environment Canada.
18. Hughes, K., Paterson, J., and Meek, M. E. (2009). Tools for the prioritization of substances on the Domestic Substances List in Canada on the basis of hazard. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 55, 382.
19. Baun, A., Eriksson, E., Ledin, A., and Mikkelsen, P. S. (2006). A methodology for ranking and hazard identification of xenobiotic organic compounds in urban stormwater. Science of the Total Environment, 370, 29.
20. Davis, G. A., Swanson, M. B., and Jones, S. L. (1994). Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodologies. Knoxville, TN: Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies, University of Tennesse.
21. Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Mikkelsen, P. S., and Ledin, A. (2006). Selected stormwater priority pollutants (SSPP) - Introduction and database. Copenhagen, Denmark: Institute of Environment and Resources, Technical University of Denmark.
22. Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppälä, T. (2002). Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 90, 177.
23. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2007). 2007 CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of toxicological profiles and support document. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Final contaminant candidate list 3 chemicals: Screening to a PCCL. Washington, DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Final contaminant candidate List 3 chemicals: Classification of the PCCL to CCL. Washington, DC: Office of Water, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Final contaminant candidate list 3 chemicals: Identifying the universe. Washington, DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Methodology for risk-based prioritization under ChAMP. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
28. Guinée, J., and Heijungs, R. (1993). A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of products. Chemosphere, 26, 1925.
29. Hertwich, E. G., Mateles, S. F., Pease, W. S., and McKone, T. E. (2001). Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 928.
30. Pennington, D. W., and Bare, J. C. (2001). Comparison of chemical screening and ranking approaches: The waste minimization prioritization tool versus toxic equivalency potentials. Risk Analysis, 21, 897.
31. Ralston, M. D., Fort, D. L., Jon, J. H., and Kwiat, J. K. (1999). The waste minimization priortization tool: A computerized system for prioritizing chemicals based on PBT characteristics. in 217th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society Anaheim, California. ENVR 180.
32. Ralston, M. D., Fort, D. L., Jon, J. H., and Kwiat, J. K. (2000). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency waste minimization prioritization tool: Computerized system for prioritizing chemicals based on PBT characteristics, in Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals II. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). Waste minimization prioritization tool beta test version 1.0: User's guide and system documentation (draft). Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
34. Oslo and Paris (OSPAR) Commissions. (2006). Dynamic selection and prioritisation mechanism for hazardous substances (new DYNAMEC manual). OSPAR Commission.
35. Whiteside, M., Mineau, P., Morrison, C., and Knopper, L. D. (2008). Comparison of a score-based approach with risk-based ranking of in-use agricultural pesticides in Canada to aquatic receptors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 4, 215.
36. Kools, S. A. E., Boxall, A. B. A., Moltmann, J. F., Bryning, G., Koschorreck, J., and Knacker, T. (2008). A ranking of European veterinary medicines based on environmental risks. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 4, 399.
37. Russom, C. L., Anderson, E. B., Greenwood, B. E., and Pilli, A. (1991). ASTER: An integration of the AQUIRE data base and the QSAR system for use in ecological risk assessments. Science of the Total Environment, 109-110, 667.
38. Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Mikkelsen, P. S., and Ledin, A. (2005). Chemical hazard identification and assessment tool for evaluation of stormwater priority pollutants. Water Science and Technology, 51, 47.
39. Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Scholes, L., Ledin, A., Ahlman, S., Revitt, M., Noutsopoulos, C., and Mikkelsen, P. S. (2007). Selected stormwater priority pollutants: A European perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 383, 41.
40. Müller-Herold, U., Morosini, M., and Schucht, O. (2004). Choosing chemicals for precautionary regulation: A filter series approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 683.
41. Senese, V., Boriani, E., Baderna, D., Mariani, A., Lodi, M., Finizio, A., Testa, S., and Benfenati, E. (2010). Assessing the environmental risks associated with contaminated sites: Definition of an Ecotoxicological Classification index for landfill areas (ECRIS). Chemosphere, 80, 60.
42. Verro, R., Calliera, M., Maffioli, G., Auteri, D., Sala, S., Finizio, A., and Vighi, M. (2002). GIS-Based System for surface water risk assessment of agricultural chemicals. 1. Methodological approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 1532.
43. Verro, R., Finizio, A., Otto, S., and Vighi, M. (2009). Predicting pesticide environmental risk in intensive agricultural areas. II: Screening level risk assessment of complex mixtures in surface waters. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 530.
44. Verro, R., Finizio, A., Otto, S., and Vighi, M. (2009). Predicting pesticide environmental risk in intensive agricultural areas. I: Screening level risk assessment of individual chemicals in surface waters. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 522.
45. Halfon, E., and Reggiani, M. G. (1986). On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard. Environmental Science and Technology, 20, 1173.
46. Juraske, R., Antón, A., Castells, F., and Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2007). PestScreen: A screening approach for scoring and ranking pesticides by their environmental and toxicological concern. Environment International, 33, 886.
47. Arnot, J. A., and Mackay, D. (2008). Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: Can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and quantity information be combined? Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 4648.
48. Arnot, J. A., Mackay, D., Webster, E., and Southwood, J. M. (2006). Screening level risk assessment model for chemical fate and effects in the environment. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 2316.
49. Finizio, A., Calliera, M., and Vighi, M. (2001). Rating systems for pesticide risk classification on different ecosystems. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 49, 262.
50. Mitchell, R. R., Summer, C. L., Blonde, S. A., Bush, D. M., Hurlburt, G. K., Snyder, E. M., and Giesy, J. P. (2002). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes: Resulting chemical scores and rankings. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8, 537.
51. Snyder, E., Snyder, S., Giesy, J., Blonde, S., Hurlburt, G., Summer, C., Mitchell, R., and Bush, D. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part I: Structure of the scoring and ranking system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 7, 51.
52. Snyder, E., Snyder, S., Giesy, J., Blonde, S., Hurlburt, G., Summer, C., Mitchell, R., and Bush, D. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part II: Bioaccumulation potential and persistence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 7, 116.
53. Snyder, E., Snyder, S., Giesy, J., Blonde, S., Hurlburt, G., Summer, C., Mitchell, R., and Bush, D. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part III. Acute and subchronic or chronic toxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 7, 176. (Pubitemid 30620859)
54. Snyder, E., Snyder, S., Giesy, J., Blonde, S., Hurlburt, G., Summer, C., Mitchell, R., and Bush, D. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part IV. Results from representative chemicals, sensitivity analysis, and discriminatory power. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 7, 220.
55. Agerstrand, M., and Ruden, C. (2010). Evaluation of the accuracy and consistency of the Swedish Environmental Classification and Information System for pharmaceuticals. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 2327.
56. National Research Council. (1999). Setting priorities for drinking water contaminants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
57. National Research Council. (2001). Classifying drinking water contaminants for regulatory consideration. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). Developing the risk-screening environmental indicators. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
59. Boethling, R., Fenner, K., Howard, P., Klečka, G., Madsen, T., Snape, J. R., and Whelan, M. J. (2009). Environmental persistence of organic pollutants: Guidance for development and review of POP risk profiles. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 539.
60. Gobas, F. A. P. C., de Wolf, W., Burkhard, L. P., Verbruggen, E., and Plotzke, K. (2009). Revisiting bioaccumulation criteria for POPs and PBT assessments. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 624.
61. Klečka, G. M., Muir, D. C. G., Dohmen, P., Eisenreich, S. J., Gobas, F. A. P. C., Jones, K. C., Mackay, D., Tarazona, J. V., and van Wijk, D. (2009). Introduction to special series: Science-based guidance and framework for the evaluation and identification of PBTs and POPs. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 535.
62. Scheringer, M., Jones, K. C., Matthies, M., Simonich, S., and van de Meent, D. (2009). Multimedia partitioning, overall persistence, and long-range transport potential in the context of POPs and PBT chemical assessments. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 557.
63. Solomon, K. R., Dohmen, P., Fairbrother, A., Marchand, M., and McCarty, L. (2009). Use of (Eco)toxicity data as screening criteria for the identification and classification of PBT/POP compounds. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 680.
64. Weisbrod, A. V., Woodburn, K. B., Koelmans, A. A., Parkerton, T. F., McElroy, A. E., and Borga, K. (2009). Evaluation of bioaccumulation using in vivo laboratory and field studies. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 598.
65. van Wijk, D., Chénier, R., Henry, T., Hernando, M. D., and Schulte, C. (2009). Integrated approach to PBT and POP prioritization and risk assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5, 697.
66. European Commission. (1993). Council Regulation 793/93: Evaluation and control of risks of existing substances. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
67. European Commission. (1994). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1197/94 concerning the first list of priority substances as foreseen under Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
68. European Commission. (1995). Commission Regulation (EC) No 2268/95 concerning the second list of priority substances as forseen under Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. Brussels, Begium: European Commission.
69. European Commission. (1997). Commission Regulation (EC) No 143/97 concerning the third list of priority substances as forseen under Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. Burssels, Blegium: European Commission.
70. European Commission. (2000). Commission Regulation (EC) No 2364/2000 concerning the fourth list of priority substances as forseen under Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
71. Klein, W., Denzer, S., Herrchen, M., Lepper, P., Müller, M., Sehrt, R., Storm, A., and Volmer, J. (1999). Annex 1 to: Revised proposal for a list of priority substances in the context of the Water Frame Directive (COMMPS procedure). Fraunhofer-Institut, Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie, 57377 Schmallenberg, Germany.
72. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2007). Appendix A to 2007 CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of toxicological profiles and support document: Summary data for 2007 priority list of hazardous substances. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
73. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Drinking water contaminant candidate list 3: Final. Federal Register, 74, 51850.
74. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Risk-based prioritization (RBP) decisions summary. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
75. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Technical appendix A to user's manual for RSEI version 2.2.0: Listing of all toxicity weights for TRI chemicals and chemical categories. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
76. Environment Canada. (2008). First priority substances list (PSL1). Retrieved from http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/psap/psl1-1.cfm
77. Environment Canada. (2006). Second priority substances list (PSL2). Retrieved from http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/psap/psl2-1.cfm
78. OSPAR Commission. (2009). OSPAR list of chemicals for priority action(revised 2009). London, England: OSPAR Commission.
79. Mackay, D., McCarty, L. S., and MacLeod, M. (2001). On the validity of classifying chemicals for persistence, bioaccumulation, toxiciy, and potential for long-range transport. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 1491.
80. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). The role of screening-level risk assessments and refining contaminants of concern in baseline ecological risk assessments. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
81. Zhong, W., Wang, D., Xu, X., Luo, Q., Wang, B., Shan, X., and Wang, Z. (2010). Screening level ecological risk assessment for phenols in surface water of the Taihu Lake. Chemosphere, 80, 998.
82. Naito, W., Gamo, Y., and Yoshida, K. (2006). Screening-level risk assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate for aquatic organisms using monitoring data in Japan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 115, 451.
83. Weinstein, J. E., Crawford, K. D., Garner, T. R., and Flemming, A. J. (2010). Screening-level ecological and human health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in stormwater detention pond sediments of Coastal South Carolina, USA. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178, 906.
84. Wenning, R., Dodge, D., Peck, B., Shearer, K., Luksemburg, W., Della Sala, S., and Scazzola, R. (2000). Screening-level ecological risk assessment of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in sediments and aquatic biota from the Venice Lagoon, Italy. Chemosphere, 40, 1179.
85. United Nations Environment Program. (2001). Final act of the conference of plenipotentiaries on the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environment Program.
86. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (1998). Protocol to the 1979 convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants. Aarhus, Denmark: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
87. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). Proposed category for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals. Federal Registry, 63, 53417.
88. European Commission. (2003). Technical guidance document on risk assessment. Ispra, Italy: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Comsumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau.
89. Buchman, M. F. (2008). NOAA screening quick reference tables. Seattle, WA: Office of Response and Restoriation Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adiministration.
90. Friday, G. P. (1998). Ecological Screening values for surface water, sediment, and soil. Aiken, SC: Weistinghouse Savannah River Company, Savannah River Technology Center.
91. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Region III BTAG freshwater screening benchmarks. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/eco/btag/ sbv/fw/screenbench.htm
92. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2003). Region 5, RCRA Ecological screening levels. Washington, DC: USEPA.
93. Barron, M. G., and Wharton, S. R. (2005). Survey of methodologies for developing media screening values for ecological risk assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1, 320.
94. Suter, G. W. II, Barnthouse, L. W., Bartell, S. M., Cormier, S. M., Mackay, D., Mackay, N., and Norton, S. B. (2006). Ecological risk assessment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
95. MacLeod, M., Scheringer, M., McKone, T. E., and Hungerbuhler, K. (2010). The state of multimedia mass-balance modeling in environmental science and decision-making. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 8360.
96. Gómez, M. J., Gómez-Ramos, M. M., Agüera, A., Mezcua, M., Herrera, S., and Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2009). A new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous analysis of target and non-target organic contaminants in waters. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 4071.
97. Helbling, D. E., Hollender, J., Kohler, H.-P. E., Singer, H., and Fenner, K. (2010). High-throughput identification of microbial transformation products of organic micropollutants. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 6621.
98. Hernández, F., Portolés, T., Pitarch, E., and López, F. J. (2007). Target and nontarget screening of organic micropollutants in water by solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography/high- resolution time-offlight mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 79, 9494.
99. Gómez, M. J., Gómez-Ramos, M. M., Malato, O., Mezcua, M., and Férnandez-Alba, A. R. (2010). Rapid automated screening, identification and quantification of organic micro-contaminants and their main transformation products in wastewater and river waters using liquid chromatography-quadrupole-timeof- flight mass spectrometry with an accurate-mass database. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217, 7038.
100. Nardelli, V., dell'Oro, D., Palermo, C., and Centonze, D. (2010). Multi-residue method for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in fish feed based on a cleanup approach followed by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217, 4996.
101. Lu, C., Liu, X., Dong, F., Xu, J., Song, W., Zhang, C., Li, Y., and Zheng, Y. (2010). Simultaneous determination of pyrethrins residues in teas by ultraperformance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 678, 56.
102. Dabrowska, H., Dabrowski, L., Biziuk, M., Gaca, J., and Namiesnik, J. (2003). Solid-phase extraction clean-up of soil and sediment extracts for the determination of various types of pollutants in a single run. Journal of Chromatography A, 1003, 29.
103. Smalling, K. L., and Kuivila, K. M. (2008). Multi-residue method for the analysis of 85 current-use and legacy pesticides in bed and suspended sediments. Journal of Chromatography A, 1210, 8.
104. Peters, R. J. B., Bolck, Y. J. C., Rutgers, P., Stolker, A. A. M., and Nielen, M. W. F. (2009). Multi-residue screening of veterinary drugs in egg, fish and meat using high-resolution liquid chromatography accurate mass time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 8206.
105. Hiemstra, M., and de Kok, A. (2007). Comprehensive multi-residue method for the target analysis of pesticides in crops using liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1154, 3.
106. Shao, B., Chen, D., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., and Sun, C. (2009). Determination of 76 pharmaceutical drugs by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 8312.
107. Jedziniak, P., Szprengier-Juszkiewicz, T., and Olejnik, M. (2009). Determination of benzimidazoles and levamisole residues in milk by liquid chromatogram phy-mass spectrometry: Screening method development and validation. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 8165.
108. Prieto, A., Schrader, S., and Moeder, M. (2010). Determination of organic priority pollutants and emerging compounds in wastewater and snow samples using multiresidue protocols on the basis of microextraction by packed sorbents coupled to large volume injection gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217, 6002.
109. Portolés, T., Pitarch, E., López, F. J., and Hernández, F. (2011). Development and validation of a rapid and wide-scope qualitative screening method for detection and identification of organic pollutants in natural water and wastewater by gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 303.
110. Walorczyk, S. (2007). Development of a multi-residue screening method for the determination of pesticides in cereals and dry animal feed using gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1165, 200.
111. Malone, E. M., Dowling, G., Elliott, C. T., Kennedy, D. G., and Regan, L. (2009). Development of a rapid, multi-class method for the confirmatory analysis of anti-inflammatory drugs in bovine milk using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 8132.
112. Leung, G. N. W., Leung, D. K. K., Wan, T. S. M., and Wong, C. H. F. (2007). High throughput screening of sub-ppb levels of basic drugs in equine plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1156, 271.
113. Vandecasteele, K., Gaus, I., Debreuck, W., and Walraevens, K. (2000). Identification and quantification of 77 pesticides in groundwater using solid phase coupled to liquid-liquid microextraction and reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Analytical Chemistry, 72, 3093.
114. Gracia-Lor, E., Sancho, J. V., and Hernández, F. (2011). Multi-class determination of around 50 pharmaceuticals, including 26 antibiotics, in environmental and wastewater samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 2264.
115. Coscollá, C., Yusá, V., Beser, M. I., and Pastor, A. (2009). Multi-residue analysis of 30 currently used pesticides in fine airborne particulate matter (PM 2.5) by microwave-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 8817.
116. Togola, A., and Budzinski, H. (2008). Multi-residue analysis of pharmaceutical compounds in aqueous samples. Journal of Chromatography A, 1177, 150.
117. Petrovic, M., Gros, M., and Barcelo, D. (2006). Multi-residue analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater by ultra-performance liquid chromatographyquadrupole- time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1124, 68.
118. Hernández, F., Pozo, O. J., Sancho, J. V., Bijlsma, L., Barreda, M., and Pitarch, E. (2006). Multiresidue liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of 52 non gas chromatography-amenable pesticides and metabolites in different food commodities. Journal of Chromatography A, 1109, 242.
119. Ferrer, I., and Thurman, E. M. (2007). Multi-residue method for the analysis of 101 pesticides and their degradates in food and water samples by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1175, 24.
120. Carro, A. M., Lorenzo, R. A., Fernández, F., Rodil, R., and Cela, R. (2005). Multiresidue screening of chlorinated and brominated compounds from aquaculture samples using matrix solid-phase dispersion-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1071, 93.
121. Hammel, Y.-A., Mohamed, R., Gremaud, E., LeBreton, M.-H., and Guy, P. A. (2008). Multi-screening approach to monitor and quantify 42 antibiotic residues in honey by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1177, 58.
122. Hussen, A., Westbom, R., Megersa, N., Mathiasson, L., and Björklund, E. (2007). Selective pressurized liquid extraction for multi-residue analysis of organochlorine pesticides in soil. Journal of Chromatography A, 1152, 247.
123. Yang, J.-F., Ying, G.-G., Zhao, J.-L., Tao, R., Su, H.-C., and Chen, F. (2010). Simultaneous determination of four classes of antibiotics in sediments of the Pearl Rivers using RRLC-MS/MS. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 3424.
124. Zhang, Z., Ohiozebau, E., and Rhind, S. M. (2011). Simultaneous extraction and clean-up of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls from sheep liver tissue by selective pressurized liquid extraction and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 1203.
125. Kiguchi, O., Saitoh, K., and Ogawa, N. (2007). Simultaneous extraction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls from contaminated soil using pressurized liquid extraction. Journal of Chromatography A, 1144, 262.
126. Kania-Korwel, I., Zhao, H., Norstrom, K., Li, X., Hornbuckle, K. C., and Lehmler, H.-J. (2008). Simultaneous extraction and clean-up of polychlorinated biphenyls and their metabolites from small tissue samples using pressurized liquid extraction. Journal of Chromatography A, 1214, 37.
127. Pang, G.-F., Cao, Y.-Z., Zhang, J.-J., Fan, C.-L., Liu, Y.-M., Li, X.-M., Jia, G.-Q., Li, Z.-Y., Shi, Y.-Q., Wu, Y.-P., and Guo, T.-T. (2006). Validation study on 660 pesticide residues in animal tissues by gel permeation chromatography cleanup/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1125, 1.
128. Bruchet, A., Prompsy, C., Filippi, G., and Souali, A. (2002). A broad spectrum analytical scheme for the screening of edocrine disruptors (EDs), pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewaters and natural waters. Water Science and Technology, 46, 97.