Adapting stakeholder processes to region-specific challenges in marine protected area network planning

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 24-33

  Fox, Evan ^a   Poncelet, Eric ^a,b   Connor, Darci ^a   Vasques, Jason ^c,f   Ugoretz, John ^c,g   McCreary, Scott ^a,d   Monié, Dominique ^a   Harty, Michael ^b   Gleason, Mary ^a,e  

^a Department of Water Resources Sacramento   (United States)

^b Kearns and West Inc   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^d CONCUR Inc ^*  (United States)

^e THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^f The Coral Reef Alliance   (United States)

^g NAVAIR   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURES; MANAGEMENT CHARACTERISTICS; MARINE LIFE PROTECTION ACTS; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING; PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT;

CONSERVATION; PROCESS DESIGN;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

COAST; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; FACILITATION; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARINE PARK; NUMERICAL MODEL; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; STAKEHOLDER;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875250967     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Airamé S., Dugan J.E., Lafferty K.D., Leslie H.M., McArdle D.A., Warner R.R. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:S170-S184.
2. Beierle T.C., Cayford J. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions 2002, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
3. Bingham G. Resolving Environmental Disputes: a Decade of Experience 1986, The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
4. Bjorkstedt E. Habitat, size, and spacing evaluations of BRTF recommended MPA proposals for the MLPA North Coast Study Region. Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission and the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force, February 2, 2011, Sacramento, CA 2011, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/northcoastproposals/habitat_powerpoint.pdf.
5. Broad K., Sanchirico J.N. Local perspectives on marine reserve creation in the Bahamas. Ocean & Coastal Management 2008, 51:763-771.
6. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) California Master Plan for Marine Protected Areas 2008, Approved February, 2008, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/masterplan.asp.
7. Carr M.H., Saarman E.T., Caldwell M.R. The role of " rules of thumb" in science-based environmental policy: California's Marine Life Protection Act as a case study. Stanford Journal of Law, Science, and Policy 2010, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjlsp/cgi-bin/articles/index.php.
8. Christie P., White A.T. Best practices for improved governance of coral reef marine protected areas. Coral Reefs 2007, 26(4):1047-2056.
9. Cowie-Haskell B.D., Delaney J.M. Integrating science into the design of the Tortugas Ecological Reserve. Marine Technology Society Journal 2003, 37(1):68-79.
10. Dalton T.M. Beyond biogeography: a framework for involving the public in planning of U.S. marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 2005, 19(5):1392-1401.
11. Dalton T.M. Exploring participants' views of participatory coastal and marine resource management processes. Coastal Management 2006, 34(4):351-367.
12. Daniels S.E., Walker G.B. Working through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach 2001, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.
13. Dukes E.F. Integration in environmental conflict. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 2001, 19(1):103-115.
14. Fox E., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Weber M., Gleason M., Kirlin J., Caldwell M., Mastrup S. Enabling conditions to support marine protected area network planning: California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative as a case study. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:14-23.
15. Gaines S. Size and spacing evaluations of the round 3 SCRSG MPA proposals for the MLPA south coast study region. Presentation to the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force, October 20, 2009, Long Beach, CA 2009, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_102009g1.pdf.
16. Gilliland P.M., Laffoley D. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2008, 32:787-796.
17. Glasbergen P. The question of environmental governance. Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-private Agreements as a Policy Strategy 1998, 1-18. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Glasbergen (Ed.).
18. Gleason M.G., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Merrifield M., McClintock W., Serpa P., Hoffmann K. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north-central California. Ocean & Coastal Management 2010, 53:52-68.
19. Gleason M., Fox E., Ashcraft S., Vasques J., Whiteman E., Serpa P., Saarman E., Caldwell M., Frimodig A., Miller-Henson M., Kirlin J., Ota B., Pope E., Weber M., Wiseman K. Designing a network of marine protected areas in California: achievements, costs, lessons learned, and challenges ahead. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:90-101.
20. Gopnik M., Fieseler C., Cantral L., McClellan K., Pendleton L., Crowder L. Coming to the table: early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2012, 36(5):1139-1149.
21. Gray B. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems 1989, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
22. Halpern B.S., Diamond J., Gaines S., Gelcich S., Gleason M., Jennings S., Lester S., Mace A., McCook L., McLeod K., Napoli N., Rawson K., Rice J., Rosenberg A., Ruckelshaus M., Saier B., Sandifer P., Sholtz A., Zivian A. Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of coastal and marine spatial planning (CMSP). Marine Policy 2012, 36(1):198-205.
23. Halvorsen K.E. Critical next steps in research on public meetings and environmental decision making. Human Ecology Review 2006, 13(2):150-160.
24. Harty J.M. Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: South Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Online Survey and Lessons Learned 2010, (accessed 22.09.11). http://environmentalpolicy.ucdavis.edu/files/cepb/SCRSG%2520Report%2520FINAL.pdf.
25. Harty J.M., John D. Report on Lessons Learned from the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative 2006, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_090606d.pdf.
26. Harty J.M., John D. Report on Lessons Learned from the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: North Central Coast Study Region 2008, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_110408a.pdf.
27. Irvin R.A., Stansbury J.S. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review 2004, 64(1):55-65.
28. Kirlin J., Caldwell M., Gleason M., Weber M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Miller-Henson M. California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: supporting implementation of legislation establishing a statewide network of marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:3-13.
29. Koontz T.M., Thomas C.W. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?. Public Administration Review 2006, 66(6):111-121.
30. Leslie H.M. A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conservation Biology 2005, 19(6):1701-1713.
31. Long F.J., Arnold M.B. The Power of Environmental Partnerships 1995, Harcourt Brace & Company, Fort Worth, TX.
32. McCloskey M. The skeptic: collaboration has its limits. High Country News May 13, 1996, 7.
33. McCreary S., Poncelet E. Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Central Coast Project Facilitator's Report 2006, Prepared for John Kirlin, Executive Director, MLPA Initiative, (accessed 25.10.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_090606f.pdf.
34. Marine Life Protection Act Initiative (MLPA Initiative) California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Regional Profile of the North Coast Study Region (Alder Creek to the California-Oregon Border) April 29, 2010, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/ncprofile.asp.
35. Merrifield M., McClintock W., Burt C., Fox E., Serpa P., Steinback C., Gleason M. MarineMap: a web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:67-76.
36. National Research Council (NRC) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education 2008, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. T. Dietz, P.C. Stern (Eds.).
37. O'Leary R. Environmental mediation: what do we know and how do we know it?. Mediating Environmental Conflicts: Theory and Practice 1995, 17-35. Quorum Books, Westport, CT. J.W. Blackburn, W.M. Bruce (Eds.).
38. Osmond M., Airame S., Caldwell M., Day J. Lessons for marine conservation planning: a comparison of three marine protected area planning processes. Ocean & Coastal Management 2010, 53(2):41-51.
39. Pomeroy R., Douvere F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy 2008, 32:816-822.
40. Raab J. Evaluation of the Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Process 2006, Raab Associates, Ltd., Boston, MA, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_090606e.pdf.
41. Reed M. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:2417-2431.
42. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2005, 30(2):251-290.
43. Saarman E., Gleason M., Ugoretz J., Airame S., Carr M., Fox E., Frimodig A., Mason T., Vasques J. The role of science in supporting marine protected area network planning and design in California. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:45-56.
44. Sayce K., Shuman C., Connor D., Reisewitz A., Pope E., Miller-Henson M., Poncelet E., Monie D., Owens B. Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: public participation roles in California's statewide marine protected area planning process. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 74:57-66.
45. Schiff K.C., Weisberg S.B., Raco-Rands V. Inventory of ocean monitoring in the Southern California Bight. Environmental Management 2002, 26(6):871-876.
46. Stern A.J., Hicks T. The Process of Business/Environmental Collaborations: Partnering for Sustainability 2000, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
47. Suman D., Shivlani M., Milon J. Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: a comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Ocean & Coastal Management 1999, 42:1019-1040.
48. Tuler S., Webler T. Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process. Society and Natural Resources 1999, 12:437.
49. Tuler S., Webler T. How preferences for public participation are linked to perceptions of the context, preferences for outcomes, and individual characteristics. Environmental Management 2010, 46(4):254-267.
50. U.S.Department of Commerce (USDOC) Strategy for Stewardship: Tortugas Ecological Reserve Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Final Supplemental Management Plan 2000, 310 pp, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Ocean Service/Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Silver Spring, MD, USA, (accessed 22.09.11). http://www.fknms.nos.noaa.gov/regs/FinalFSEIS.pdf.
51. Webler T., van Over B. Participants' Perceptions of Communication in the North Coast MLPA Process 2011, Project Report, Social and Environmental Research Institute, Greenfield, MA, (accessed 01.04.12), 24 pp. http://www.seri-us.org/pubs/MLPA1Report.pdf.
52. Weible C., Sabatier P.A., Lubell M. A comparison of a collaborative and top-down approach to the use of science in policy: establishing marine protected areas in California. The Policy Studies Journal 2004, 32(2):187-207.
53. White A., Vogt H. Philippine coral reefs under threat: lessons learned after 25 years of community-based reef conservation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2000, 40:537-550.
54. Wondolleck J.M., Yaffee S.L. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management 2000, Island Press, Washington, DC.