California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: Supporting implementation of legislation establishing a statewide network of marine protected areas

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-13

  Kirlin, John ^a   Caldwell, Meg ^a,b   Gleason, Mary ^a,c   Weber, Mike ^d   Ugoretz, John ^e,f   Fox, Evan ^a   Miller Henson, Melissa ^a  

^a Department of Water Resources Sacramento   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^d LLP   (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^f NAVAIR   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; MARINE LIFE PROTECTION ACTS; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING; PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY; REGULATORY DECISIONS; ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT;

CONSERVATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

DECISION MAKING; HABITAT CONSERVATION; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; LEGISLATIVE IMPLEMENTATION; MARINE PARK; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER; STATE ROLE;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875239824     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Airame S., Dugan J.E., Lafferty K.D., Leslie H., McArdle D.A., Warner R.R. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 2003, 13(1):S170-S184.
2. Bormann B.T., Haynes R.W., Martin J.R. Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: did some rubber hit the road?. BioScience 2007, 57(2):186-191.
3. Brewer G.D., deLeon P. The Foundations of Policy Analysis 1983, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
4. Caldwell M.R., Thesing A. Channel Islands: Part I, SLS Case No. 06-041 2006, Stanford Law School Case Studies Collection, (accessed 02.06.12.). http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/centers/enrlp/casestudies/collection/SLS06-041.pdf.
5. California Department of Fish and Game California Marine Life Protection Act: Master Plan for Marine Protected Areas January 2008, Revised Draft.
6. 2850-2863 California Fish and Game Code (Marine Life Protection Act) Sections 2850-2863. (accessed 09.01.12.). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode%3fsection%3dF%26GC%26group%3d02001-03000%26file%3d2850-2863.
7. California Fish and Game Commission Lessons Learned from California's Marine Life Management Act 2010, (prepared by project team lead by Harty Conflict Consulting & Mediation), (accessed 09.02.11.). http://www.F%26GC.ca.gov/public/reports/FinalMLMALessonsLearnedReport051810.pdf.
8. California Fish and Game Commission, 2010b. Staff Summary, Meeting of December 15-16, 2010. (accessed 29.05.11.). http://www.F%26GC.ca.gov/meetings/2010/121610summary.pdf.
9. California Fish and Game Commission, 2011. Staff Summary, Meeting of June 29, 2011. (accessed 29.01.12.). http://www.F%26GC.ca.gov/meetings/2011/062911summary.pdf.
10. California Legislative Analyst's Office, 2011. The 2012-13 Budget: California's Fiscal Outlook (accessed 08.01.12.). http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2011.pdf.
11. California Resources Agency, The California Department of Fish and Game and the Resources Legacy Fund Foundation. Memorandum of Understanding, August 27, 2004. A second MOU among the same parties was signed December 12, 2006 and amended on July 15, 2008. (accessed 28.02.11.). http://www.CDFG.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/mou072508.pdf.
12. Carr M.H., Saarman E., Caldwell M.R. The role of " rules of thumb" in science-based environmental policy: California's marine life protection act as a case study. Stanford Journal of Law, Science and Policy 2010, 2:1-16.
13. Convention on Biological Diversity Global Outcome-oriented Targets for the Implementation of the Programmes of Work on the Biological Diversity of Inland Water Ecosystems and Marine and Coastal Biodiversity 1999, (accessed 07.02.10.). http://www.cbd.int/convention/results/?id=10683%26kw%3D10%20%25%26l0%3DMAR%26t0%3D10%20%25.
14. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, 2005. (accessed 25.11.11.). http://www.brac.gov/finalreport.html.
15. deLeon P., deLeon L. What ever happened to policy implementation? an alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2002, 12.4:467-492.
16. Fox E., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Weber M., Gleason M., Kirlin J., Caldwell M., Mastrup S. Enabling conditions to support marine protected area network planning: California's Marine Life Protection Act as a case study. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:14-23.
17. Fox E., Poncelet E., Connor D., Vasques J., Ugoretz J., McCreary S., Monie D., Harty M., Gleason M. Adapting stakeholder processes to region-specific challenges in marine protected area network planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:24-33.
18. Fox E., Hastings S., Miller-Henson M., Monie D., Ugoretz J., Frimodig A., Shuman C., Owens B., Garwood R., Connor D., Serpa P., Gleason M. Addressing policy issues in a stakeholder-based and science-driven marine protected area network planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:34-44.
19. Gleason M.G., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Merrifield M., McClintock W., Serpa P., Hoffmann K. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north-central California. Ocean and Coastal Management 2010, 53:52-68.
20. Gleason M.G., Fox E., Vasques J., Whiteman E., Ashcraft S., Frimodig A., Serpa P., Saarman E., Miller-Henson M., Kirlin J., Weber M., Caldwell M., Ota B., Pope E., Wiseman K. Designing a network of marine protected areas in California: achievements, costs, lessons learned, and challenges ahead. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:90-101.
21. Ingram H. Implementation: a review and suggested framework. Public Administration: The State of the Art 1990, Chatham House, Chatham, NJ. N.B. Lynn, A. Wildavsky (Eds.).
22. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN-WCPA) Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks - Making it Happen 2008, IUCN-WCPA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, The Nature Conservancy, Washington, D.C., 118 pp.
23. Klein C.J., Chan A., Kircher L., Cundiff A.J., Gardner N., Hrovat Y., Scholz A., Kendall B.E., Airame S. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 2008, 22.3:691-700.
24. Lasswell H.D. The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis 1956, Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Maryland Press, College Park, MD.
25. Layzer J.A. Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-Based Management and the Environment 2008, MIT Press.
26. Lin A.C. Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison 2000, NJ. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
27. Mazmanian D., Sabatier P. Implementation and Public Policy 1989, University Press of America. second edition with a new postscript.
28. McArdle D.A. California Marine Protected Areas: Past and Present 2002, California Sea Grant College System Publication, La Jolla, CA.
29. Merrifield M., McClintock W., Burt C., Fox E., Gleason M., Serpa P., Steinback C. MarineMap: a web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:67-76.
30. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Reserves and Marine Protected Areas 2001, http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/Consensus/consensus.pdf.
31. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2008. Cordell Bank, Gulf of the Farallones, and Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuaries, Volume IV of IV. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Section 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives Description. (accessed 18.10.11.). http://montereybay.noaa.gov/intro/mp/feis/02proposed.pdf.
32. National Research Council The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery 2002, (accessed 02.05.12.). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php%3frecord_id%3d10277.
33. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management NOAA Ocean Service. Snapshot of United States MPAs April 2011, (accessed 11.06.11.). http://www.mpa.gov/pdf/helpful-resources/us_mpas_snapshot.pdf.
34. Osmond M., Airame S., Caldwell M., Day J. Lessons for marine conservation planning: a comparison of three marine protected area planning processes. Ocean and Coastal Management 2010, 53:41-51.
35. Handbook of Public Administration 2003, Sage Publications Ltd. second ed. B.G. Peters, J. Pierre (Eds.).
36. Saarman E., Gleason M., Ugoretz J., Airame S., Carr M., Frimodig A., Mason T., Vasques J., Fox E. The role of science in supporting marine protected area network planning and design in California. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:45-56.
37. Sayce K., Shuman C., Connor D., Reisewitz A., Pope E., Miller-Henson M., Poncelet E., Monie D., Owens B. Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: public participation roles in California's statewide marine protected area planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:57-66.
38. Global Ocean Protection: Present Status and Future Possibilities 2010, Brest, France: Agence des aires marines protégées, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA: IUCN WCPA, Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC, Arlington, USA: TNC, Tokyo, Japan: UNU, New York, USA: WCS. 96pp. Page 28, (accessed 07.02.10.). http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2010-053.pdf, C. Toropova, I. Meliane, D. Laffoley, E. Matthews, M. Spalding (Eds.).
39. Weible C.M. Caught in a maelstrom: implementing California marine protected areas. Coastal Management 2008, 36(4):350-373.
40. White J.W., Scholz A.J., Rassweiler A., Steinback C., Botsford L.W., Kruse S., Costello C., Mitarai S., Siegel D.A., Drake P.T., Edwards C.A. A comparison of approaches used for economic analysis in marine protected area network planning in California. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:77-89.
41. Zegart A. Blue ribbons, black boxes: toward a better understanding of presidential commissions. Presidential Studies Quarterly 2004, 32(2):366-393. (June).