The role of science in supporting marine protected area network planning and design in California

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 45-56

  Saarman, Emily ^a,b   Gleason, Mary ^c   Ugoretz, John ^d,f   Airamé, Satie ^b,e   Carr, Mark ^a   Fox, Evan ^b   Frimodig, Adam ^d   Mason, Tom ^d   Vasques, Jason ^d,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Water Resources Sacramento   (United States)

^c THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f NAVAIR   (United States)

^g The Coral Reef Alliance   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES; EFFECTIVE TOOL; MARINE CONSERVATIONS; MARINE LIFE PROTECTION ACTS; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; NETWORK PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY PROCESS; PLANNING PROCESS;

CONSERVATION; DESIGN; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; LEGISLATIVE IMPLEMENTATION; MARINE PARK; MARINE POLICY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875248042     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agardy T.E. The Science of Conservation in the Coastal Zone: New Insight on How to Design, Implement, and Monitor Marine Protected Areas 1994, A marine conservation and development report, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
2. Airamé S., Dugan J.E., Lafferty K.D., Leslie H., McArdle D.A., Warner R.R. Appling ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:S170-S184.
3. Allen L.G., Pondella D.J., Horn M.H. The Ecology of California Marine Fishes 2006, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
4. Allison G.W., Lubchenco J., Carr M.H. Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications 1998, 9:S79-S92.
5. Auster P.J., Houde E.D., Willison M. California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: Peer Review of the Scientific Guidelines Found in the MLPA Master Plan Framework 2006, Oregon Sea Grant, (accessed 21.08.12). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/binder3a.pdf.
6. Blanchette C.A., Miner C.M., Raimondi P.T., Lohse D., Heady K.E.K., Broitman B.R. Biogeographical patterns of rocky intertidal communities along the Pacific coast of North America. Journal of Biogeography 2008, 35:1593-1607.
7. Botsford L.W., Hastings A., Gaines S.D. Dependence of sustainability on the configuration of marine reserves and larval dispersal distance. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:144-150.
8. California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) Status of the Fisheries Report: An Update through 2008 2008, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA. T. Larinto (Ed.).
9. Carr M.H., Reed D.C. Conceptual issues relevant to marine harvest refuges: examples from temperate reef fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1993, 50:2019-2028.
10. Carr M.H., Saarman E.T., Caldwell M.R. The role of " Rules of thumb" in science-based environmental policy: California's Marine Life Protection Act as a case study. Stanford Journal of Law, Science, and Policy 2010, 2.
11. Claudet J., Osenberg C.W., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Domenici P., Garcia-Charton J.-A., Perez-Ruzafa A., Badalamenti F., Bayle-Sempere J., Brito A., Bulleri F., Culioli J.-M., Dimech M., Falcon J.M., Guala I., Milazzo M., Sanchez-Meca J., Somerfi{ligature}eld P.J., Stobart B., Vandeperre F., Valle C., Planes S. Marine reserves: size and age do matter. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:481-489.
12. Cowen R.K., Sponaugle S. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Annual Review of Marine Science 2009, 1:443-466.
13. Dawson M.N. Phylogeography in coastal marine animals: a solution from California?. Journal of Biogeography 2001, 28:723-736.
14. Fernandes L., Day J., Kerrigan B., Breen D., De'ath G., Mapstone B., Coles R., Done T., Marsh H., Poiner I., Ward T., Williams D., Kenchington R. A process to design a network of marine no-take areas: lessons from the Great Barrier Reef. Ocean and Coastal Management 2009, 52:439-447.
15. Fernandes L., Day J.C., Lewis A., Slegers S., Kerrigan B., Breen D., Cameron D., Jago B., Hall J., Lowe D., Innes J., Tanzer J., Chadwick V., Thompson L., Gorman K., Simmons M., Barnett B., Sampson K., De'ath G., Mapstone B., Marsh H., Possingham H.P., Ball I., Ward T., Dobbs K., Aumend J., Slater D., Stapleton K. Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier reef: large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:1733-1744.
16. Fox E., Hastings S., Miller-Henson M., Monie D., Ugoretz J., Frimodig A., Shuman C., Owens B., Garwood R., Connor D., Serpa P., Gleason M. Addressing policy issues in a stakeholder-based and science-driven marine protected area network planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:34-44.
17. Fox E., Poncelet E., Connor D., Vasques J., Ugoretz J., McCreary S., Monie D., Harty M., Gleason M. Adapting stakeholder processes to region-specific challenges in marine protected area planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:24-33.
18. Fox E., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Weber M., Gleason M., Kirlin J., Caldwell M. Enabling conditions to support marine protected area network planning: California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative as a case study. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:14-23.
19. Freiwald J. Movement of adult temperate reef fishes off the west coast of North America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2012, 69:1362-1374.
20. Gaines S.D., White C., Carr M.H., Palumbi S.R. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:18286-18293.
21. Gleason M., Fox E., Vasques J., Whiteman E., Ashcraft S., Frimodig A., Serpa P., Saarman E.T., Caldwell M., Miller-Henson M., Kirlin J., Ota B., Pope E., Weber M., Wiseman K. Designing a statewide network of marine protected areas in California: achievements, costs, lessons learned, and challenges ahead. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:90-101.
22. Gleason M., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Merrifield M., McClintock W., Serpa P., Hoffman K. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean and Coastal Management 2010, 53:52-68.
23. Graham M.B., Halpern B.S., Carr M.H. Diversity and dynamics of California subtidal kelp forests. Food Webs and the Dynamics of Marine Reefs 2008, Oxford University Press. T.R. McClanahan, G.M. Branch (Eds.).
24. Halpern B.S. The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter?. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:S117-S137.
25. Halpern B.S., Warner R.R. Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 2003, 207:1871-1878.
26. Hamilton S.L., Caselle J.E., Malone D.P., Carr M.H. Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:18272-18277.
27. Hilborn R., Parrish R.H., Walters C. Peer Review: California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Science Advice and MPA Network Proposals 2006, California Fisheries Coalition, Sacramento, CA, (accessed 21.08.12). http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/preferred8.pdf.
28. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, I.-W. Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks-Making it Happen 2008, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and The Nature Conservancy, Washington, DC, 118 pp.
29. Kinlan B.P., Gaines S.D. Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 2003, 84:2007-2020.
30. Kirlin J., Caldwell M., Gleason M., Weber M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Miller-Henson M. California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: supporting implementation of legislation establishing a statewide network of marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:3-13.
31. Lea R.N., McAllister R.D., VenTresca D.A. Biological aspects of nearshore rockfishes of the genus Sebastes from Central California, with notes on ecologically related sport fishes. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 1999, 177:109.
32. Lester S.E., Halpern B.S., Grorud-Colvert K., Lubchenco J., Ruttenberg B.I., Gaines S.D., Airamé S., Warner R.R. Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2009, 384:33-46.
33. Love M.S., Carr M.H., Haldorson L.J. The ecology of substrate-associated juveniles of the genus Sebastes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 1991, 225-243.
34. Lowe C.G., Bray R.N. Movement and activity patterns. The Ecology of Marine Fishes: California and Adjacent Waters 2006, 524-553. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. L.G. Allen, D.J. Pondella, M.H. Horn (Eds.).
35. McArdle D.A. California Marine Protected Areas 1997, California Sea Grant College System, La Jolla, CA.
36. Meffe G.K., Boersma P.D., Murphy D.D., Noon B.R., Pulliam H.R., Soulé M.E., Waller D.M. Independent scientific review in natural resource management. Conservation Biology 1998, 12:268-270.
37. Merrifield M., McClintock W., Burt C., Fox E., Serpa P., Steinback C., Gleason M. MarineMap: web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:67-76.
38. MLPA California Marine Life Protection Act 1999, California Fish and Game Code, (Chapter 10.5) §§2850-2863.
39. MLPA Science Advisory Team Draft Methods Used to Evaluate Marine Protected Area Proposals in the MLPA North Central Coast Study Region May 30, 2008, Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, Sacramento, CA.
40. MLPA Science Advisory Team Draft Methods Used to Evaluate Marine Protected Area Proposals in the MLPA South Coast Study Region October 26, 2009, Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, Sacramento, CA.
41. MLPA Science Advisory Team Draft Methods Used to Evaluate Marine Protected Area Proposals in the MLPA North Coast Study Region January 13, 2011, Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, Sacramento, CA.
42. Murray S.N., Littler M.M., Abbott I.A. Biogeography of the California marine algae with emphasis on the Southern California islands. The California Islands: Proceedings of a Multi-disciplinary Symposium 1980, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA. D.M. Powers (Ed.).
43. National Research Council (NRC) Improving the Use of the " Best Scientific Information Available" 2004, Standard in Fisheries Management, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
44. Osmond M., Airamé S., Caldwell M.R., Day J.C. Lessons for marine conservation planning: a comparison of three marine protected area planning processes. Ocean and Coastal Management 2010, 53:41-51.
45. Palumbi S.R. Population genetics, demographic connectivity and the design of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:S146-S158.
46. Pollnac R., Christie P., Cinner J.E., Dalton T., Daw T.M., Forrester G.E., Graham N.A., McClanahan T.R. Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:18262-18265.
47. Roberts C.M. Selecting marine reserve locations: optimality versus opportunism. Bulletin of Marine Science 2000, 66:581-592.
48. Roberts C.M., Andelman S., Branch G., Bustamante R.H., Castilla J.C., Dugan J., Halpern B.S., Lafferty K.D., Leslie H., Lubchenco J., McArdle D., Possingham H.P., Ruckelshaus M., Warner R.R. Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and developing reserve networks. Ecological Applications Supplement 2003, 13:215-228.
49. Roberts C.M., Andelman S., Branch G., Bustamante R.H., Castilla J.C., Dugan J., Halpern B.S., Lafferty K.D., Leslie H., Lubchenco J., McArdle D., Possingham H.P., Ruckelshaus M., Warner R.R. Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecological Applications Supplement 2003, 13:199-214.
50. Roberts C.M., Halpern B.S., Palumbi S.R., Warner R.R. Designing reserve networks: why small, isolated protected areas are not enough. Conservation Biology 2001, 2:10-17.
51. Shanks A.L. Pelagic larval duration and dispersal distance revisited. The Biological Bulletin 2009, 216:373-385.
52. Shanks A.L., Grantham B.A., Carr M.H. Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:S159-S169.
53. Siegel D.A., Kinlan B.P., Gaylord B., Gaines S.D. Lagrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersion. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2003, 260:83-96.
54. Starr R.M., O'Connell V., Ralston S. Movements of lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) in southeast Alaska: potential for increased conservation and yield from marine reserves. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:1083-1094.
55. Sullivan P.J., Acheson J.M., Angermeier P.L., Faast T., Flemma J., Jones C.M., Knudsen E.E., Minello T.J., Secor D.J., Wunderlich R., Zanetell B.A. Defining and implementing best available science for fisheries and environmental science, policy, and management. Fisheries 2006, 31:460-465.
56. Weible C. Caught in a maelstrom: implementing California marine protected areas. Coastal Management 2008, 36:350-373.
57. White J.W., Scholz A., Rassweiler A., Steinback C., Botsford L.W., Kruse S., Costello C., Mitarai S., Siegel D.A., Drake P.T., Edwards C.A. A comparison of approaches used for economic analysis in marine protected area network planning in California. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 74:77-89.