Higher-taxon and cross-taxon surrogates for odonate biodiversity in Brazil

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 34-39

  Vianna, Dana Moiana ^a   De Marco Júnior, Paulo ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodiversity surrogates; Conservation; Odonate distribution; Species richness gradients; Wallacean shortfall

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875171842     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2012.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Araujo MB, Densham PJ & Williams PH, 2004. Representing species in reserves from patterns of assemblage diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 31:1037-1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01051.x
2. Balmford A, Lyon AJE & Lang RM, 2000. Testing the highertaxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi. Biological Conservation, 93:209-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00140-8
3. Bini LM et al., 2009. Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression. Ecography, 32:193-204. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05717.x
4. Bruner AG, Gullison RE & Balmford A, 2004. Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience, 54:1119-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1119:FCAS OM]2.0.CO;2
5. De Marco Junior P & Vianna DM, 2005. Distribuição do esforço de coleta de Odonata no Brasil: subsídios para escolha de áreas prioritárias para levantamentos faunísticos. Lundiana, 6:13-26.
6. Diniz JAF, De Marco P & Hawkins BA, 2010. Defying the curse of ignorance: perspectives in insect macroecology and conservation biogeography. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 3:172-179.
7. Dormann CF, 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16:129-138. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00279.x
8. Dutilleul P, 1993. Modifying the t-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics, 49:305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2532625
9. Eversham BC & Cooper JM, 1998. Dragonfly species-richness and temperature: national patterns and latitude trends in Britain. Odonatologica, 27:307-316.
10. Faith DP, 2003. Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species-level biodiversity. Ecography, 26:374-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03300.x
11. Forest F et al., 2007. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 445:757-760. PMid:17301791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05587
12. Galindo-Leal C & Câmara IG, 2003. The Atlantic forest of South America: Biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Whashington: Island Press.
13. Grelle CEV, 2002. Is higher-taxon analysis an useful surrogate of species richness in studies of Neotropical mammal diversity? Biological Conservation, 108:101-106. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00094-0
14. Janzen DH, 2004. Setting up tropical biodiversity for conservation through non-damaging use: participation by parataxonomists. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41:181-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00879.x
15. Keil P, Simova I & Hawkins BA, 2008. Water-energy and the geographical species richness pattern of European and North African dragonflies (Odonata). Insect Conservation and Diversity, 1:142-150. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00019.x
16. Laurance WF, 1999. Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91:109-117. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00088-9
17. Legendre L & Legendre P, 1998. Numerical Ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. McGeoch MA, 1998. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biological Reviews, 73:181-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000632319700515X
19. Oertli B, 2008. The use of dragonflies in the assessment and monitoring of aquatic habitats. In: Cordoba-Aguilar A (ed.). Model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Pawar SS et al., 2007. Conservation biogeography in North-east India: hierarchical analysis of cross-taxon distributional congruence. Diversity and Distributions, 13:53-65.
21. Prendergast JR et al., 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365:335-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/365335a0
22. Pressey RL, Possingham HP & Day JR, 1997. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation, 80:207-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0006-3207(96)00045-6
23. Rangel TF, Diniz JAF & Bini LM, 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33:46-50. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x
24. Ricketts TH, Daily GC & Ehrlich PR, 2002. Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? Testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biological Conservation, 103:361-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00147-1
25. Rodrigues ASL & Brooks TM, 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38:713-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095737
26. Sanders HL, 1968. Marine benthic diversity: A comparative study. The American Naturalist, 102:243-282. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/282541
27. Silva DP, De Marco P & Resende DC, 2010. Adult odonate abundance and community assemblage measures as indicators of stream ecological integrity: A case study. Ecological Indicators, 10:744-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2009.12.004
28. Silva JMC, Rylands AB & Fonseca GAB, 2005. The fate of the Amazonian areas of endemism. Conservation Biology, 19:689-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00705.x