The Influence of Agenda-Based and Habitual Processes on Item Selection During Study

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 899-912

  Dunlosky, John ^a   Ariel, Robert ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agenda based regulation; Habitual responding; Item selection; Reading bias; Self regulated study

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STATISTICS; STUDENT; TIME PERCEPTION; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STUDENTS; TIME PERCEPTION; UNIVERSITIES; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79960340150     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023064     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ariel R., Dunlosky J., Bailey H. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138:432-447. doi: 10.1037/a0015928.
2. Atkinson R.C. Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist 1972, 27:921-931. doi: 10.1037/h0033572.
3. Atkinson R.C. Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 96:124-129. doi: 10.1037/h0033475.
4. Bargh J.A. Social psychological approaches to consciousness. The Cambridge handook of consciousness 2007, 555-569. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson (Eds.).
5. Castel A.D. The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. The psychology of learning and motivation: Skill and strategy in memory use 2007, 48:225-270. Academic Press, London, England, doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(07)48006-9. A.S. Benjamin, B.H. Ross (Eds.).
6. Dunlosky J., Ariel R. Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2011, 54:103-140.
7. Dunlosky J., Bottiroli S., Hartwig M. Sins committed in the name of ecological validity: A call for representative design in education research. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 430-440. Psychology Press, New York, NY. D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A. Graesser (Eds.).
8. Dunlosky J., Thiede K.W. What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect people's self-paced study and yield "labor-and-gain" effects. Acta Psychologica 1998, 98:37-56. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00051-6.
9. Dunlosky J., Thiede K.W. Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in control of study. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:779-788. doi: 10.3758/BF03195868.
10. Eviatar Z. Reading direction and attention: Effects on lateralized ignoring. Brain and Cognition 1995, 29:137-150. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1273.
11. Kornell N., Metcalfe J. Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:609-622. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609.
12. Le Ny J.F., Denhière G., Le Taillanter D. Regulation of study-time and interstimulus similarity in self-paced learning conditions. Acta Psychologica 1972, 36:280-289. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(72)90012-1.
13. Lohse G.L. Consumer eye movement patterns on yellow pages advertising. Journal of Advertising 1997, 26:61-73.
14. Mantonakis A., Rodero P., Lesschaeve I., Hastie R. Order in choice: Effects of serial position on preferences. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1309-1312. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02453.x.
15. Metcalfe J. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:349-363. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.349.
16. Metcalfe J. Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychology Science 2009, 18:159-163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x.
17. Metcalfe J., Kornell N. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:530-542. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530.
18. Metcalfe J., Kornell N. A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:463-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001.
19. Murphy J., Hofacker C., Mizerski R. Primacy and receny effects on clicking behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006, 11. Article 7.
20. Nelson T.O., Leonesio R.J. Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:676-686. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.676.
21. Ouellet M., Santiago J., Israeli Z., Gabay S. Is the future the right time?. Experimental Psychology 2010, 57:308-314. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000036.
22. Pelegrina S., Bajo M.T., Justicia F. Allocation of time in self-paced memory tasks: The role of practice, instructions, and individual differences in optimizing performance. Learning and Individual Differences 1999, 11:401-429. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80011-9.
23. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (in press). Retrieval-monitoring-feedback (RMF) technique for producing efficient and durable learning. In R. Azevedo (Ed.), The international handbook of metacognition and learning technologies.
24. Shaki S., Fischer M.H., Pertrusic W.M. Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:328-331. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328.
25. Son L.K., Metcalfe J. Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:204-221. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204.
26. Thiede K.W., Dunlosky J. Toward a general model of self-paced study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1024-1037. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024.
27. Zebian S. Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionalality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2005, 5:165-190. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068660.