D-score: A search engine independent MD-score

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1036-1041

  Vaudel, Marc ^a   Breiter, Daniela ^a,b   Beck, Florian ^a   Rahnenführer, Jörg ^b   Martens, Lennart ^c,d   Zahedi, René P ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR ANALYTISCHE WISSENSCHAFTEN ISAS E V   (Germany)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Peptide identification; PTM; PTM localization scores

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COST; D SCORE; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SAMPLE SIZE; SEARCH ENGINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 84874998505     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200408     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yates, J. R., 3rd, Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Schieltz, D., Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1426-1436.
2. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
3. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
4. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
5. Burkhart, J. M., Vaudel, M., Gambaryan, S., Radau, S. et al., The first comprehensive and quantitative analysis of human platelet protein composition allows the comparative analysis of structural and functional pathways. Blood 2012, 120, e73-e82.
6. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
7. Colaert, N., Degroeve, S., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5555-5561.
8. Chalkley, R. J., Clauser, K. R., Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2012, 11, 3-14.
9. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Gygi, S. P., A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1285-1292.
10. Beck, F., Lewandrowski, U., Wiltfang, M., Feldmann, I. et al., The good, the bad, the ugly: validating the mass spectrometric analysis of modified peptides. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1099-1109.
11. Savitski, M. M., Lemeer, S., Boesche, M., Lang, M. et al., Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, M110 003830.
12. Olsen, J. V., Blagoev, B., Gnad, F., Macek, B. et al., Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127, 635-648.
13. Taus, T., Kocher, T., Pichler, P., Paschke, C. et al., Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5354-5362.
14. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
15. Vaudel, M., Barsnes, H., Berven, F. S., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., SearchGUI: an open-source graphical user interface for simultaneous OMSSA and X!Tandem searches. Proteomics 2011, 11, 996-999.
16. Apweiler, R., Bairoch, A., Wu, C. H., Barker, W. C. et al., UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D115-D119.
17. Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., MascotDatfile: an open-source library to fully parse and analyse MASCOT MS/MS search results. Proteomics 2007, 7, 364-366.
18. Barsnes, H., Huber, S., Sickmann, A., Eidhammer, I., Martens, L., OMSSA Parser: an open-source library to parse and extract data from OMSSA MS/MS search results. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3772-3774.
19. Muth, T., Vaudel, M., Barsnes, H., Martens, L., Sickmann, A., XTandem Parser: an open-source library to parse and analyse X!Tandem MS/MS search results. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1522-1524.
20. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
21. Barboza, R., Cociorva, D., Xu, T., Barbosa, V. C. et al., Can the false-discovery rate be misleading? Proteomics 2011, 11, 4105-4108.
22. Everett, L. J., Bierl, C., Master, S. R., Unbiased statistical analysis for multi-stage proteomic search strategies. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 700-707.
23. Klimek, J., Eddes, J. S., Hohmann, L., Jackson, J. et al., The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved peptide and protein identification software tools. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 96-103.
24. Granholm, V., Noble, W. S., Kall, L., On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2671-2678.
25. Vaudel, M., Burkhart, J. M., Breiter, D., Zahedi, R. P. et al., A complex standard for protein identification, designed by evolution. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5065-5071.
26. Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Jones, P., Adamski, M. et al., PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3537-3545.