Head-down posture induces PERG alterations in early glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 255-264

  Ventura, Lori M ^a   Golubev, Iuri ^a   Lee, William ^a   Nose, Izuru ^a   Parel, Jean Marie ^a   Feuer, William J ^a   Porciatti, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Body posture; Glaucoma; IOP; Pattern electroretinogram; Retinal ganglion cell function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA ARTERY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HEAD-DOWN TILT; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RETINAL DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84874941556     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318232973b     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Maffei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science. 1981;211: 953-955. (Pubitemid 11141462)
2. Zrenner E. The physiological basis of the pattern electroretinogram. In: Osborne N, Chader G, eds. Progress in Retinal Research. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990: 427-464. (Pubitemid 20096529)
3. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 2797-2810. (Pubitemid 30624416)
4. Holder GE. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20: 531-561. (Pubitemid 32523897)
5. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Physiologic significance of steadystate pattern electroretinogram losses in glaucoma: clues from simulation of abnormalities in normal subjects. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 535-542.
6. Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17: 196-202. (Pubitemid 43790817)
7. Bach M, Hoffmann MB. Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85: 386-395.
8. Aldebasi YH, Drasdo N, Morgan JE, et al. S-cone, L+Mcone, and pattern, electroretinograms in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Vision Res. 2004;44: 2749-2756. (Pubitemid 39165554)
9. Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Restoration of retinal ganglion cell function in early glaucoma after intraocular pressure reduction: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 20-27. (Pubitemid 40075313)
10. Falsini B, Marangoni D, Salgarello T, et al. Structure-function relationship in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: interindividual and interocular analysis by OCT and pattern ERG. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246: 1153-1162.
11. Weber AJ, Harman CD. Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 3197-3207. (Pubitemid 44264305)
12. Nesher R, Trick GL, Kass MA, et al. Steady-state pattern electroretinogram following long term unilateral administration of timolol to ocular hypertensive subjects. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990;75: 101-109. (Pubitemid 20362328)
13. Falsini B, Colotto A, Porciatti V, et al. Follow-up study with Pattern ERG in ocular hypertension and glaucoma patients under timolol maleate treatment. Clin Vision Sci. 1992;7: 341-347.
14. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, et al. Transiently raised intraocular pressure reveals pattern electroretinogram losses in ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37: 2663-2670. (Pubitemid 27027361)
15. Ventura LM, Sorokac N, De Los Santos R, et al. The relationship between retinal ganglion cell function and retinal nerve fiber thickness in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 3904-3911. (Pubitemid 46049515)
16. Salgarello T, Falsini B, Stifano G, et al. Morpho-functional follow-up of the optic nerve in treated ocular hypertension: disc morphometry and steady-state pattern electroretinogram. Curr Eye Res. 2008;33: 709-721.
17. Sehi M, Grewal DS, Goodkin ML, et al. Reversal of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2010;117: 2329-2336.
18. Saleh M, Nagaraju M, Porciatti V. Longitudinal evaluation of retinal ganglion cell function and IOP in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 4564-4572. (Pubitemid 351260973)
19. Nagaraju M, Saleh M, Porciatti V. IOP-dependent retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in glaucomatous DBA/2J mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 4573-4579. (Pubitemid 351260974)
20. Porciatti V, Nagaraju M. Head-up tilt lowers IOP and improves RGC dysfunction in glaucomatous DBA/2J mice. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90: 452-460.
21. Kothe AC, Lovasik JV. A parametric evaluation of retinal vascular perfusion pressure and visual neural function in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;75: 185-199. (Pubitemid 20069581)
22. Kremmer S, Tolksdorf-Kremmer A, Stodtmeister R. Simultaneous registration of VECP and pattern ERG during artificially raised intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologica. 1995;209: 233-241.
23. Krieglstein GK, Waller WK, Leydhecker W. The vascular basis of the positional influence of the intraocular pressure. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978;206: 99-106. (Pubitemid 8301671)
24. Weinreb RN, Cook J, Friberg TR. Effect of inverted body position on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98: 784-787. (Pubitemid 15219241)
25. Friberg TR, Sanborn G, Weinreb RN. Intraocular and episcleral venous pressure increase during inverted posture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103: 523-526. (Pubitemid 17056896)
26. Linder BJ, Trick GL, Wolf ML. Altering body position affects intraocular pressure and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29: 1492-1497.
27. Lima BD, Venzara F, De Los Santos R, et al. Postural Changes of Intraocular Pressure and Their Impact on Retinal Ganglion Cell Function. IOVS. ARVO Meeting Abstracts. 2007;48:212.
28. Ventura LM, Golubev I, Mansuri O, et al. Head-Down Posture Induces PERG Alterations in Glaucoma Suspects. IOVS. ARVO Meeting Abstracts, 2008;49:2876.
29. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The ocular hypertension treatment study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117: 573-583. (Pubitemid 29218422)
30. Pakter HM, Schuman J, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the retinal fiber layer with comparison to heidelberg retina tomography optic head measurements in normal and glaucomatous eyes. In: Lemij HG, Schuman JS, eds. The Shape of Glaucoma: Quantitative Neural Imaging Techniques. The Hague: Kugler Publishers; 2000: 149-181.
31. Hidajat R,Mclay J, Burley C, et al. Influence of axial length od normal eyes on PERG. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;107: 195-200. (Pubitemid 37461155)
32. Oner A, Gumus K, Arda H, et al. Pattern electroretinographic recordings in eyes with myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35: 238-241.
33. Liu JH, Gokhale PA, Loving RT, et al. Laboratory assessment of diurnal and nocturnal ocular perfusion pressures in humans. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2003;19: 291-297. (Pubitemid 37013003)
34. Liu JH, Kripke DF, Twa MD, et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40: 2912-2917. (Pubitemid 29521605)
35. Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, et al. Twenty-fourhour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 1586-1590. (Pubitemid 36378585)
36. Katkov VE, Chestukhin VV, Lapteva RI, et al. Central and cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism of the healthy man during head-down tilting. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979;50: 147-153. (Pubitemid 9115782)
37. Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Pawelczyk JA, et al. Effects of headdown- tilt bed rest on cerebral hemodynamics during orthostatic stress. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83: 2139-2145. (Pubitemid 28006520)
38. Toris CB, Gabelt BT, Kaufman PL. Update on the mechanism of action of topical prostaglandins for intraocular pressure reduction. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53(Suppl1):S107-S120.
39. Guthoff R, Piechnick J, Jorgensen J. A new device for the measurement of episcleral venous pressure - its clinical use in the evaluation of aqueous humor circulation under physiological and pathological conditions. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1988;85: 158-160.
40. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. Ophthalmology. 2004;111: 161-168. (Pubitemid 38032225)
41. Yang A, Swanson WH. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 671-679. (Pubitemid 46483690)
42. Fredette MJ, Anderson DR, Porciatti V, et al. Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 957-963. (Pubitemid 351756511)
43. Bowd C, Tafreshi A, Vizzeri G, et al. Repeatability of pattern electroretinogram measurements using a new paradigm optimized for glaucoma detection. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 437-442.
44. Vizzeri G, Tafreshi A, Weinreb RN, et al. Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of Pattern Electroretinogram Optimized for Glaucoma Detection (PERGLA). J Glaucoma. 2010;19: 77-82.
45. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res. 1983;23: 689-699. (Pubitemid 13077459)
46. Peachey NS, Seiple WH. Contrast sensitivity of the human pattern electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28: 151-157. (Pubitemid 17230203)
47. Muller A, Godenschweger L, Lang GE, et al. Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004. 221: 762-768. (Pubitemid 39390857)
48. Kumar S,Middlemiss C, BulsaraM, et al. Telemedicine-friendly, portable tonometers: an evaluation for intraocular pressure screening. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34: 666-670. (Pubitemid 44363617)
49. Sayegh FN, Weigelin E. Functional ophthalmodynamometry: comparison between brachial and ophthalmic blood pressure in sitting and supine position. Angiology. 1983;34: 176-182. (Pubitemid 13153062)
50. Longo A, Geiser MH, Riva CE. Posture changes and subfoveal choroidal blood flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 546-551. (Pubitemid 38140513)
51. Sayegh FN, Weigelin E. Functional ophthalmodynamometry. Comparison between dynamometry findings of healthy subjects in sitting and supine positions. Ophthalmologica. 1983;187: 196-201. (Pubitemid 14206644)
52. Kaeser P, Orgul S, Zawinka C, et al. Influence of change in body position on choroidal blood flow in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89: 1302-1305. (Pubitemid 41638870)
53. Kothe AC. The effect of posture on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38(suppl):S191-S197. (Pubitemid 124017816)
54. Lovasik JV, Kothe AC, Kergoat H. Comparison of noninvasive methods to derive the mean central retinal artery pressure in man. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70: 1005-1011. (Pubitemid 24008931)
55. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120: 714-720. discussion 829-730. (Pubitemid 34620349)
56. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology. 1999;106: 2154-2160. (Pubitemid 30194239)
57. Lovasik JV, Kothe AC. Ocular refraction with body orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989;60: 321-328. (Pubitemid 19086606)
58. Savin E, Bailliart O, Checoury A, et al. Influence of posture on middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;71: 161-165.
59. Morgan WH, Yu DY, Alder VA, et al. The correlation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure and retrolaminar tissue pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39: 1419-1428. (Pubitemid 28307367)
60. Berdahl JP, Allingham RR, Johnson DH. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure is decreased in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 763-768. (Pubitemid 351602306)
61. Berdahl JP, Fautsch MP, Stinnett SS, et al. Intracranial pressure in primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension: a case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 5412-5418.
62. Friberg TR, Weinreb RN. Ocular manifestations of gravity inversion. JAMA. 1985;253: 1755-1757. (Pubitemid 15136539)
63. Downs JC, Roberts MD, Burgoyne CF. Mechanical environment of the optic nerve head in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85: 425-435.
64. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, et al. Modeling individualspecific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part I: IOPinduced deformations and influence of geometry. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2008.
65. Maingret F, Fosset M, Lesage F, et al. TRAAK is a mammalian neuronal mechano-gated K+ channel. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 1381-1387.
66. Reyes R, Lauritzen I, Lesage F, et al. Immunolocalization of the arachidonic acid and mechanosensitive baseline traak potassium channel in the nervous system. Neuroscience. 2000;95: 893-901.
67. Kalapesi FB, Tan JC, Coroneo MT. Stretch-activated channels: a mini-review. Are stretch-activated channels an ocular barometer? Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33: 210-217. (Pubitemid 40662791)
68. Kiuchi T, Motoyama Y, Oshika T. Relationship of progression of visual field damage to postural changes in intraocular pressure in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113: 2150-2155. (Pubitemid 44838913)
69. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res. 1998;38: 2053-2066. (Pubitemid 28322931)