Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA)

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-82

  Vizzeri, Gianmarco ^a   Tafreshi, Ali ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Glaucoma; Pattern electroretinogram; PERG; Refraction; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; OPERATOR; OPTICAL DEPTH; PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAM OPTIMIZED FOR GLAUCOMA DETECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 77149129538     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819f934e     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:161-168.
2. Ventura LM, Porciatti V, Ishida K, et al. Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:10-19.
3. Fredette MJ, Anderson DR, Porciatti V, et al. Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm. Ophthalmology. 2007;115:957-963.
4. Bowd C, Tafreshi A, Vizzeri G, et al. Repeatability of pattern electroretinogram measurements using a new paradigm optimized for glaucoma detection. J Glaucoma. 2009. In press.
5. Lace Elettronica. GLAID. Instruction Manual, Version 1.4.2.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
7. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, et al. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:364-375.
8. Porciatti V, Sorokac N, Buchser W. Habituation of retinal ganglion cell activity in response to steady state pattern visual stimuli in normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1296-1302.
9. Bobak P, Bodis-Wollner I, Harnois C, et al. Pattern electroretinograms and visual-evoked potentials in glaucoma and multiple sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:72-83.
10. Price MJ, Drance SM, Price M, et al. The pattern electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:542-547.
11. Parisi V. Impaired visual function in glaucoma. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:351-358.
12. Ringens PJ, Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga S, van Lith GH. The patternelicited electroretinogram. I. A tool in the early detection of glaucoma? Ophthalmologica. 1986;192:171-175.
13. Bach M, Speidel-Fiaux A. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989;73: 173-181.
14. Fiorentini A, Maffei L, Pirchio M, et al. The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981; 21:490-493.
15. Bach M, Hoffmann MB. Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:386-395.
16. Yang A, Swanson WH. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:671-679.
17. Degen T, Loeliger T. An improved method to continuously monitor the electrode-skin impedance during bioelectric measurements. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007. 2007:6295-6298.
18. Bach M, Mathieu M. Different effect of dioptric defocus versus light scatter on the Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG). Doc Ophthalmologica. 2004;108:99-106.
19. Odom JV, Maida TM, Dawson WW. Pattern evoked retinal response (PERR) in human: effects of spatial frequency, temporal frequency, luminance and defocus. Curr Eye Res. 1982;2:99-108.
20. Siegel MJ, Marx MS, Bodis-Wollner I, et al. The effect of refractive error on pattern electroretinograms in primates. Curr Eye Res. 1986;5:183-187.
21. Leipert KP, Gottlob I. Pattern electroretinogram: effects of meiosis, accomodation, and defocus. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987; 67335-67346.
22. Prager TC, Schweitzer FC, Peacock LW, et al. The effect of optical defocus on the pattern electroretinogram in normal subjects and patients with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:363-369.
23. Bowd C, Vizzeri G, Tafreshi A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 437-443.
24. Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern Electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:196-202.