When a person isn't a data point: Making evidence-based practice work

Federal Probation

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 11-21

  Lowenkamp, Christopher T ^a   Holsinger, Alexander M ^a   Robinson, Charles R ^b   Cullen, Francis T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b Administrative Office of the US Courts   (United States)

^c School of Criminal Justice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874927108     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th Ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
2. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of program integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173-187.
4. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100.
5. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. (1990a). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
6. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P. & Cullen, F. (1990b). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology 28 (3): 369-401.
7. Andrews, D. A. & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices. A summary of CaVIC research, (pp. 441-463). In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths.
8. Andrews, D.A. (1999). Assessing program elements for risk reduction: The correctional program assessment inventory. In Patricia M. Harris (Eds.). Research to results: Effective community corrections, (pp. 151-170). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
9. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 8, 369-404.
10. Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates (Document 06-10-1201). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
11. Ark. Code § 16-93-104 (2011). http://staging.arkleg.state.ar.us/ ftproot/bills/2011/public/SB750.pdf
12. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-270.
13. Breed, A. (2007). The state of corrections today: A triumph of pluralistic ignorance. In B. Krisberg, S. Marhionna, & C. Baird (Eds.), Continuing The Struggle For Justice: 100 Years Of The National Council On Crime And Delinquency. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Burnett, R. & McNeil, F. (2005). The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52 (3), 221-242.
15. Bush, J., Glick, B., & Taymans, J. (2011). Thinking for a Change. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
16. Capital Budget, Rev. Code of Wash. § 488-708 (2005).
17. Clear, T. R., & Latessa, E. J. (1993). Probation officer roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10, 441-462.
18. Cleveland, Clinic. (2012). Treatments for coronary artery disease. Retrieved from http://my.clevelandclinic.org/heart/disorders/cad/treatments.aspx
19. Council of State Governments Justice Center, New Hampshire: Implementing the Strategy (New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center), http://justicereinvestment.org/states/new-hampshire/how-nh/.
20. Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice (2009). Implementing evidence-based policy and practice in community corrections, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
21. Cullen, Francis T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly 11:527-559.
22. Drake, E., Aos, S. and Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, pp. 170-196.
23. Eisen, L., & James, J. (2012,). Reallocating justice resources: A review of 2011 state sentencing trends. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
24. Engen, R. L. & Steen, S. (2000). The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. American Journal of Sociology. 105, 1357-95.
25. Fabelo, T. N. (2011). A Ten-Step guide to transforming probation departments to reduce recidivism. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
26. Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective interventions with offenders. In Alan T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Gendreau, P. & Ross, R.R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25, 463-489.
28. Gendreau, P. & Ross, R.R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
29. Goodman, K. W. (2002). Ethics and Evidence-based Medicine. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30. Gottfredson, D.C., Kearley, B.W, Najaka, S.S., and Rocha, CM. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44(1): 3-35.
31. Gray, J. A. M. (1997). Evidence-based healthcare. How to make health policy and management decisions. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
32. Guyatt, G., Jaeschke, R., & McGinn, T. (2002). Therapy and validity: N of 1 randomized controlled trials in Gordon Guyatt and Drummond Rennie (Eds.), Users'guide to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press.
33. Guyatt, G. Rennie, D. Meade, M.O., & Cook, D.J. (2008). Users'guide to medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
34. Huddleston, W. & Marlowe, Douglas, J.D. (2011) Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the United States.
35. Hughes, J. (2011). We're back on track: Preparing for the next 50 years. Federal Probation 75(2): 4-6.
36. Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. § 190/10 (2009).
37. Kennealy, P., Skeem, J., Manchak, S., & Eno Louden, J. (2012). Offender-officer relationships matter: Firm, fair and caring relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior.
38. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 532.007 (2011).
39. Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L., & Tucker, K.A. (2009). Problems at work: Exploring the correlates of role stress among correctional staff. The Prison Journal, 89, 460-481.
40. Latessa, E., Lovins, L. & Smith P. (2010). Follow-up evaluation of Ohio's community based correctional facility and halfway house programs outcome study. Technical Report. University of Cincinnati.
41. Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1988). Moral Reconation Therapy: A systematic, step-by-step treatment system for treatment resistant clients. Psychological Reports, 62, 135-151.
42. Lowenkamp, C. X, Holsinger, A. M., Robinson, C. R., and Alexander, M. (2012). Diminishing or durable treatment effects of STARR? A research note on 24-month re-arrest rates. Under review Journal of Crime and Justice.
43. Lowenkamp, C. and Latessa E. (2002) Evaluation of Ohio's community based correctional facilities and halfway house programs. Technical Report. University of Cincinnati.
44. Lowenkamp, C. T., Lowenkamp, M.S. & Robinson, C. R. (2010). Effective Practices in Correctional Settings-II. Raleigh, NC: Lulu Publishing.
45. Lowenkamp, C. T. Koutsenok, I., and Lowenkamp. M. S., (2011). Integrated Behavioral Intervention Strategies (IBIS). San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego.
46. MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
47. MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35(2), 22-54.
49. Maruna, S. & Barber, C. (2011). Why can't criminology be more like medical research? Be careful what you wish for (pp. 318-334). In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.) What is criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. McNeill, F. (2009). What works and what's right? European Journal of Probation, 1 (1), pp. 21-40.
51. McNeill, E, Batchelor, S., Burnett, R., & Knox, J. (2005). 21st Century Social Work. Reducing Re-offending-. Key Practice Skills. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive.
52. Miller, S., Wampold, B., & Varhely, K. (2008). Direct comparisons of treatment modalities for youth disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18:1, 5-14.
53. New Hampshire SB500 (2010).
54. Or. Rev. Stat. § 182.525 (2003).
55. Palmer, T. (1965). Types of treaters and types of juvenile offenders. Youth Authority Quarterly, 18, 14-23.
56. Palmer, T. (1973). Matching worker and client in corrections. Social Work, 18, 95-103.
57. Palmer, T. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 131-152.
58. Palmer, T. (1991). The effectiveness of intervention: Recent trends and current issues. Crime and Delinquency, 37, 330-346.
59. Palmer, T. (1994). A profile of correctional effectiveness and new directions for research. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
60. Palmer, T. (1995). Programmatic and nonpro-grammatic aspects of successful intervention: New directions for research. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 100-131.
61. Pearson, T. A., Blair, S. N., Daniels, S. R., et al. (2002). AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. American Heart Association science advisory and coordinating committee. Circulation. 106(3):388-391.
62. Pew Center on the States, 2011 Kentucky reforms cut recidivism, costs broad bill enacts evidence-based strategies. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
63. Pew Center on the States. (2011a). The impact of Arizona's probation reforms. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
64. Pew Center on the States. (2011b). State of recidivism: The revolving doors of America's prisons. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
65. Pew Center on the States. (2011c). Risk/Needs assessment 101: Science reveals new tools to manage offenders. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
66. Pew Center on the States (2010). South Carolina's public safety reform: Legislation enacts research-based strategies to cut prison growth and costs. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
67. Purkiss, M., Kifer, M., Hemmens, C, & Burton, Jr., V. (2003). Probation officer functions: A statutory analysis. Federal Probation 67(1): 12-23.
68. Rhodes, W (2010). Predicting criminal recidivism: A research note. Journal of Experimental Criminology 7, 57-71.
69. Robinson, C. R., Lowenkamp, C. T, Holsinger, A. M., VanBenschoten, S. W, Alexander, M., & Oleson, J. C. (2012). A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): Using core correctional practices in probation interactions. Journal of Crime and Justice 35(2):167-188.
70. Ross, R., and Fabiano, E. (1991). Reasoning and rehabilitation: A handbook for teaching cognitive skills. T3 Associates, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
71. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C, Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.
72. Schicor, D. (1992). Following the penological pendulum: The survival of rehabilitation. Federal Probation 56:19-25.
73. Serin, R. C, Mailloux, D., & Wilson, N. (2010). Practice manual for use with Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR) Scale-Revised Version. Ottawa, ON: Car-leton University.
74. Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75. Skeem, J., Encandela, J., & Eno Louden, J. (2003). Perspectives on probation and mandated mental health treatment in specialized and traditional probation departments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 429-458.
76. Skeem, J., Eno Louden, J., Polasheck, & Cap, J. (2007). Relationship quality in mandated treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19, 397-410.
77. Skeem, J., Eno Louden, J., Manchak, S., Vidal, S., & Haddad, E. (2009). Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse disorders. Law & Human Behavior, 33, 122-135.
78. Smith, S. C, Jr., Allen, J., Blair, S. N., Bonow, R. O., Brass, L. M., Fonarow, G. C, et al. (2006). AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Journal of American College of Cardiology, 47, 2130-2139.
79. S. C. Code Ann. § 24-21-10 (2010).
80. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 501.092 (2009).
81. Taxman, F.S. (2008). No illusions: offender and organizational change in Maryland's proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 275-302.
82. Tonry, M. (1996). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
83. Trotter, C. (1996). The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 29(1): 29-46.
84. Trotter, C. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
85. Vogelvang, B. (2012). A communication model for offender supervision: Eight steps to make sense of science in a street-level dialogue. Den Bosch, The Netherlands: Avans University of Applied Science.
86. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, E, Benson, K., & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
87. Wanberg, K. W, & Milkman, H. B. (1998). Criminal conduct and substance abuse treatment: Strategies for self-improvement and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88. Whetzel, J., Paparozzi, M., Alexander, M., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). Goodbye to a worn-out dichotomy: Law enforcement, social work, and a balanced approach. Federal Probation 75(2): 13-15.