We're back on track: Preparing for the next 50 years

Federal Probation

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 4-6

  Hughes, John M ^a  

^a Office of Probation and Pretrial Services   (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82055190825     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Victor H. Eyjen, editor, and William A. Maio, Jr. comprised the editorial staff. The journal was published by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, as it is today, but in 1961 it was published in cooperation with the Bureau of Prisons. Warren Olney III was AO Director and Robert F. Kennedy was Attorney General. The Bureau of Prisons Director was James V. Bennett and the AO's Chief of Probation was Louis J. Sharp.
2. John J. Galvin, Federal Probation, "The Task of Corrections." September 1961.
3. Arthur E. Fink, Federal Probation, "Authority in the Correctional Process." September 1961.
4. Serapio R. Zalba, Federal Probation, "A Look at Correctional Treatment." September 1961.
5. Cullen and Gilbert, 1982, Reaffirming Rehabilitation for an historical review of punishment, the progressive era, and the demise of rehabilitation during the late 20th Century.
6. Harold B. Wooten, Federal Probation, "It's OK, Supervision Enthusiasts: You Can Come Home Now!" December 1985.
7. Guide to Judiciary Policy, Volume 8, Part E, "The Supervision of Federal Offenders" (formerly Monograph 109). J-Net (federal judiciary intranet), § 150(a)(b) (last revised 12-10-10).
8. Community observation is fieldwork that does not involve a direct contact with the offender or collateral sources. It may be the preferred way to unobtrusively monitor compliance with specific conditions in a way that does not intrude on the activity itself. For example, an officer might drive by an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting to see if the offender's car is parked there or go to an offender's work site or residence during the start or end time of his or her reported work schedule, which may be appropriate if the offender is suspected of falsely reporting employment. Guide to Judiciary Policy, Volume 8, Part E, §450.30, op.cit.
9. Guide to Judiciary Policy, op. cit.
10. Johnson et al. in this edition of Federal Probation, and Lowenkamp and Whetzel, 2010.
11. Robinson et al. in this edition of Federal Probation.
12. Hughes, Federal Probation, September 2008, "Results-based Management in Federal Probation and Pretrial Services" and Baber, Federal Probation, December 2010, "Results-based Framework for Post-conviction Supervision Recidivism Analysis."