Probation officer functions - A statutory analysis

Federal Probation

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 12-23+69

  Purkiss, Marcus ^b   Kifer, Misty ^b   Hemmens, Craig ^b   Burton Jr , Velmer S ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043074891     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Benekos, P. J. 1990. Beyond Reintegration: Community Corrections in a Retributive Era. Federal Probation 54(2): 550-557.
2. Bryan, D. 1995. Probation Officers: Cops or Counselors? Corrections Compendium 20(2): 1-3.
3. Burton, V. S., E. J. Latessa and T. Barker. 1992. The Role of Probation Officers: An Examination of Statutory Requirements. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 8(4): 273-282.
4. Cullen, F. T., F. E. Lutze, B. G. Link, and N. T. Wolfe. 1989. The Correctional Orientation of Prison Guards: Do Officers Support Rehabilitation? Federal Probation 58(3): 33-42.
5. Cullen, F. T., E. Latessa, V. S. Burton, and L. Lombardo. 1993. The Correctional Orientation of Prison Wardens: Is the Rehabilitative Ideal Supported? Criminology 31 (1):69-92.
6. Cunningham, G. 1980. Social Work and Criminal Justice: New Dimensions in Practice. Federal Probation 44(1):64-69.
7. Domurad, F. 2000. Who is Killing Our Probation Officers: The Performance Crisis in Community Corrections. Corrections Management Quarterly 4 (2):41-51.
8. Ellsworth, T. 1990. Identifying the Actual and Preferred Goals of Adult Probation. Federal Probation 44(2): 10-15.
9. Fulton, B., A. Stichman, T. Lawrence, and E. Latessa. 1997. Moderating Probation and Parole Officer Attitudes to Achieve Desired Outcomes. The Prison Journal 77(3):295-312.
10. Koehler, R. J. and C. Lindner. 1992. Alternative Incarceration: An Inevitable Response to Institutional Overcrowding. Federal Probation 56(3): 12-22.
11. Lindner, C. 1994. The Police Contribution to the Development of Probation: A Historical Account. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 20(3/4): 61-84.
12. Marquart, J. N. and J. B. Roebuck. 1995. Prison Guards and Snitches: Social Control In a Maximum Security Institution. In Haas, K. C. and G. P. Alpert (eds.), The Dilemmas of Corrections, pp. 147-165. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
13. McCleary, R. 1978. Dangerous Men: The Sociology of Parole. Beverly Hills: Sage.
14. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 (1998).
15. Petronio, R. J. 1982. Role Socialization of Juvenile Court Probation Officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior 9(2):143-158.
16. Regoli, R. M. and J. D. Hewitt. 1996. Criminal Justice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
17. Sieh, E. W. 1993. From Augustus to the Progressives: A Study of Probation's Formative Years. Federal Probation 57(3): 67-72.
18. Sluder, R. D., R. A. Shearer and D. W. Potts. 1991. Probation Officers' Role Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Firearms. Federal Probation 55(3): 3-11.
19. Welch, M. 1996. Corrections: A Critical Approach. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.