Who cares what offenders think? New insight from offender surveys

Federal Probation

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 13-15

  Whetzel, Jay ^a   Lowenkamp, Christopher T ^a  

^a Office of Probation and Pretrial Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82055193343     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2. Andrews, D.A., &Carvell, C. (1998). Core Correctional Treatment-Core Correctional Supervision and Counseling: Theory, Research, Assessment and Practice. Ottawa, ON: Carleton University.
3. Andrews, D.A. & Kiessling, J.J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices. A summary of CaVIC research, (pp. 441-463). In R.R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths.
4. Dowden, C. & Andrews, D.A. (2004). The importance of staff practices in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48: 203-214. (Pubitemid 38352318)
5. Gendreau, P. & Andrews, D.A. (1994). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory. Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
6. Gendreau, P. & Andrews, D.A. (2002). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory 2000. (CPAI 2000). Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
7. Lowenkamp, C.T. (2004). A program level analysis of the relationship between correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
8. Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., and Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective interventions. Criminology and Public Policy 5(3), pp. 575-594.
9. Skeem, J., Eno Louden, J., Polasheck, & Cap, J. (2007). Relationship quality in mandated treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19,397-410.
10. Spiegler, M.D., 8c Guevremont, D.C. (2003). Contemporary Behavior Therapy (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
11. Trotter, C. (1996) The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 29(1): 29-46.
12. Whetzel, J. (2010). How do offenders rate their officers? News 8c Views 35(8): 1-2.