Perceptions of academic honesty in online vs. face-to-face classrooms

Journal of Interactive Online Learning

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 183-198

  Spaulding, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874773539     PISSN: 15414914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
2. Ashworth, P. & Bannister, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 187.
3. Barger, S. (2002). The Marlowe-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 286-305.
4. Carnevale, D. (1999). How to proctor from a distance. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 46(12), A47-48.
5. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
6. Ferrari, J. R., Bristow, M., & Cowman, S. E. (2005). Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perceptions of institutional mission and values. College Student Journal, 39(1), 7-13.
7. Grijalva, T. C., Nowell, C., & Kerkvliet, J. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40(1), 180-185. Retrieved March 19, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 1024088781).
8. Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M., & Moran, A. C. (2006). Faculty and college students' beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1058-1080.
9. Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Social desirability among Canadian and Japanese students. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 777-779.
10. Iyer, R. & Eastman, J. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110.
11. Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233-247.
12. Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., and Davis, S. F. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal 34(2), 309-314.
13. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1986) Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413.
14. Kowalski, R.M., & Westen, D. (2004). Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Krysan, M. (1998). Privacy and the expression of white racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 506-544.
16. Mangan, K. (2006). Survey finds widespread cheating in MBA programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(6), A.44. Retrieved March 19, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 1154194381).
17. Matthews, A., Baker, F., & Spillers, R. (2003). How true is true? Assessing socially desirable response bias. Quality and Quantity, 37, 327-335.
18. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
19. McCabe, D., & Trevino, L., K. (2002). Honesty and honor codes. Academe, 88(1), 37-41. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 101408584).
20. Morton, A. (2004). Philosophy in practice: An introduction to the main question. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
21. Nagel, S. (2001). Development of an academic honesty policy: A case study in collaboration with faculty. College Student Affairs Journal, 20(2), 104-107.
22. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher's beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
23. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
24. Rowe, N. C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism. Online journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2). Retrieved March 22, 2009, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer72/rowe72.html
25. Schiffman, H.R., (2000). Sensation and perception: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students' perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587-607.
27. Symaco, L. P. & Marcelo, E. (2003). Faculty perception on student academic honesty. College Student Journal, 37(3), 327-333.
28. Wajda-Johnston, V. A., Handal, P. J., Brawer, P. A., & Fabricatore, A. N. (2001). Academic dishonesty at the graduate level. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 287-305.
29. Wang, Y. (2008). University student online plagiarism. International Journal on ELearning, 7(4), 743-758.
30. Whitley, B. E. & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 325-342.