Modelling public-transport users' behaviour at connection point

Transport Policy

Volumn 27, Issue , 2013, Pages 112-122

  Ceder, Avishai ^a   Chowdhury, Subeh ^a   Taghipouran, Nima ^a   Olsen, Jared ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cumulative prospect theory (CPT); Fuzzy logic; Public transport; Transfer; Travel behaviour

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

AUCKLAND; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND;

EID: 84874765338     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ampt E. Understanding voluntary travel behaviour change. Transport Engineering in Australia 2004, 9(2):53-66.
2. Andrade K., Uchida K., Kagaya S. Development of transport mode choice model by using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1977:8-16.
3. Atkins S.T. Personal security as a transport issue: a state-of-the-art review. Transportation Reviews 1990, 10(2):111-125.
4. Auckland Transport. (2011). Newmarket Station Judged One of NZs Best. Retrieved August 12 2012, from http://www.aucklandtransport.govt.nz/about-us/News/LatestNews/Pages/newmarket-station-best-design.aspx.
5. Auckland Transport. (2012). Britomart Transport Centre. Retrieved June 28 2012, from http://www.britomart.co.nz.
6. Avineri E. A cumulative prospect theory approach to passengers behavior modeling: waiting time paradox revisited. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2004, 8:195-204.
7. Avineri E., Prashker J.N. Sensitivity to uncertainty: need for a Paradigm Shift. Transportation Research Record 2003, 1854:90-98.
8. Avineri E., Prashker J.N. Violation of expected utility theory in route-choice stated preference. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:222-229.
9. Bachok, S. (2007). What do passengers need out of public transport information systems? In: 29th Conference of Australian Institute of Transport Research, Adelaide, Australia.
10. Beirao G., Sarsfield-Cabral J.A. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transport Policy. pp 2007, 14(6):478-489.
11. Brandstatter E., Kuhberger A., Schneider F. A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. Journal of Behavioral and Decision Making. pp 2002, 15:79-100.
12. Broekhoven E.V., De Baets B. Fast and accurate centre of gravity defuzzification of fuzzy system outputs defined on trapezoidal fuzzy partitions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2006, 157:904-918.
13. Ceder A. Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modelling and Practice 2007, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
14. Ceder A., Yann L.-A., Coriat C. Measuring public transport connectivity performance applied in Auckland. Transport Research Record 2009, 2111:139-147.
15. Cheng Y.-H. Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel. Transportation 2010, 37(6):875-896.
16. Chowdhury S.J., Ceder A. Definition of planned and unplanned transfer of public-transport service and users' decision to use routes with transfers. Journal of Public Transportation 2013, 16. in press.
17. Currie G., Delbosc A. Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne. Transport Policy 2011, 18(1):204-210.
18. Currie, G., D. Willis (1998). Melbourne bus rail interchange strategy. In: 22nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, Sydney, Australia.
19. Eboli L., Mazzulla G. Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. European Transport 2012, 51:1-21.
20. Gao S., Frejinger E., Ben-Akiva M. Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: a prospect theory approach. Transportation Research Part C 2010, 18:727-740.
21. Grotenhuis J.W., Wiegmans B.W., Rietveld P. The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: Customer needs for time and effort savings. Transport Policy 2007, 14:27-38.
22. Guo Z., Wilson N.H.M. Assessment of the transfer penalty for transit trip. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1872:10-18.
23. Guo, Z., N.H.M. Wilson (2010). Transfer behaviour and transfer planning in public transport systems: a case of the London underground. In: 11th International Conference on Advance Systems for Public Transport (CASPT), Hong Kong.
24. Guo Z., Wilson N.H.M. Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: a case study of the London Underground. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2011, 45(2):91-104.
25. Hadas Y., Ceder A. Public transit network connectivity. Transportation Research Record 2010, 2143:1-8.
26. Hadas Y., Ranjitkar P. Modeling public-transit connectivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements. Journal of Transport Geography 2012, 22:137-147.
27. Hawas Y.E. An integrated simulation-based fuzzy logic model for real-time traffic signal control. Transportmetrica 2011, 7(4):247-278.
28. Iseki H., Taylor B.D. Not all transfers are created equal: towards a framework relating transfer connectivity to travel behaviour. Transport Reviews. pp 2009, 29(6):777-800.
29. Kikuchi S., Miljkovic D. Use of fuzzy inference for modeling prediction of transit ridership at individual stops. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1774:25-35.
30. Kumar P., Kulkarni S.Y., Parida M. Security perceptions of Delhi commuters at Metro-bus interchange in multi modal perspective. Journal of Transport Security 2011, 4:295-307.
31. Li Z., Hensher D. Prospect theoretic contributions in understanding traveller behaviour: a review and some comments. Transport Reviews 2011, 31(1):97-115.
32. Liu R., Pendyala R.M., Polzin S. Assessment of intermodal transfer penalties using stated preference data. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1607:74-80.
33. Manju, V.S., M. Sajitha, K.P. Isaac (2008). Analysis of route choice behaviour of bus transit users using fuzzy logic. In: 23rd ARRB Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
34. McCord M.M., Wirtz J., Mishalani R.G. Passenger waiting time perceptions at bus stops. Journal of Public Transportation 2006, 9(2):89-106.
35. McGuckin N., Zmud J., Nakamoto Y. Trip-chaining trends in the United States: understanding travel behaviour for policy making. Transportation Research Record 2005, 1917.
36. Molin E., Chorus C. The need for advanced public transport information services when making transfers. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (EJTIR) 2009, 4(9):397-410.
37. Muller T., Furth P. Transfer scheduling and control to reduce passenger waiting time. Transport Research Record 2009, 2112:111-118.
38. Murugesan R., Rama Moorthy N.V. Level of public transport service evaluation: a fuzzy set approach. Journal of Advanced Transportation 1998, 32(2):216-240.
39. O'Fallon C., Sullivan C., Hensher D.A. Constraints affecting mode choice by morning car commuters. Transport Policy 2004, 11(1):17-29.
40. Pesendorfer D. Behavioral economics comes of age. Journal of Economic Literature 2006, 44:712-721.
41. Postorino M.N., Versaci M. A neuro-fuzzy approach to simulate the user mode choice behaviour in a travel decision framework. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation 2008, 28(1):64-71.
42. Ridwan M. Fuzzy preference based traffic assignment problem. Transportation Research Part C 2004, 12(3-4):209-233.
43. Ruxton G.D., Neuhauser M. Good practice in testing for an association in contingency tables. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2010, 64:9.
44. Schwanen T., Ettema D. Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: examining parents' behavior with cumulative prospect theory. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:511-525.
45. Senbil M., Kitamura R. Reference points in commuter departure time choice: a prospect theoretic test of alternative decision frames. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 2004, 8(1):19-31.
46. Teodorovic D. Fuzzy logic systems for transportation engineering: the state of the art. Transportation Research Part A 1999, 33(5):337-364.
47. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5(4):297-323.
48. Van de Kaa E.J. Applicability of an extended prospect theory to travel behaviour research: a meta-analysis. Transport Reviews 2010, 30(6):771-804.
49. Van de Kaa E.J. Prospect theory and choice behaviour strategies: review and synthesis of concepts from social and transport sciences. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2010, 10(4):299-329.
50. Vande Walle S., Steenberghen T. Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:151-162.
51. Verplanken B., Aarts H., Van Knipperberg A., Moonen A. Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment. British Journal of Management 1998, 37:111-128.
52. Wakker P., Fennema H. Original and cumulative prospect theory: a discussion of empirical difference. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making 1997, 10:53-64.
53. Xu H., Zhou J., Xu W. A decision making rule for modeling travelers' route choice behaviour based on cumulative prospect theory. Transport Research Part C 2011, 19(2):218-228.
54. Xumei C., Qiaoxian L., Guang D. Estimation of travel time values for urban public transport passengers based on sp survey. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 2011, 11(4):77-84.
55. Ye X., Pendyala R.M., Gottardi G. An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transportation Research Part B. pp 2007, 41:96-113.
56. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 1965, 8(3):338-353.
57. Zhang L., Prevedouros P.D. User perceptions of signalised intersection level of service using fuzzy logic. Transportmetrica 2011, 7(4):279-296.
58. Zhou, X., X. Yang, Y. Lao (2007). Public transport service level influence on travel mode choice. In: International Conference on Transportation Engineering, Chengdu, China.