Antagonistic versus nonantagonistic models of balancing selection: Characterizing the relative timescales and hitchhiking effects of partial selective sweeps

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 908-917

  Connallon, Tim ^a   Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Genetic variation; Pleiotropy; Polymorphism; Sex linkage; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANTAGONISM; DOMINANCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLYMORPHISM; SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; TIMESCALE;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC LINKAGE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84874746005     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01800.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and S. P. Otto 2005. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 310:119-121.
2. Andrés, A. M., M. J. Hubisz, A. Indap, D. G. Torgerson, J. D. Degenhardt, A. R. Boyko, R. N. Gutenkunst, T. J. White, E. D. Green, C. D. Bustamante, et al. 2009. Targets of balancing selection in the human genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:2755-2764.
3. Barton, N. H. 1998. The effect of hitchhiking on neutral genealogies. Genet. Res. 72:123-133.
4. Betancourt, A. J., Y. Kim, and H. A. Orr 2004. A pseudohitchhiking model of X vs. autosomal diversity. Genetics 168:2261-2269.
5. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
6. Brommer, J. E., M. Kirkpatrick, A. Qvarnström, and L. Gustafsson 2007. The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection. PLoS One 2:e744.
7. Charlesworth, B. 1987. The heritability of fitness. Pp. 21-40 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, New York
8. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth 2010. Elements of evolutionary genetics. Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village, CO
9. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes 1999. The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits. Pp. 369-392 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Vol. 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K
10. Charlesworth, D. 2006. Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genet. 2:e64.
11. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1671-1675.
12. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark 2010. Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution 64:3417-3442.
13. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark 2012. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation. Genetics 190:1477-1489.
14. Connallon, T., R. M. Cox, and R. Calsbeek 2010. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64:1671-1682.
15. Coop, G., and P. L. Ralph 2012. Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps. Genetics 192:205-224.
16. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek 2010. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict. Science 328:92-94.
17. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York
18. Curtsinger, J. W., P. M. Service, and T. Prout 1994. Antagonistic pleiotroy, reversal of dominance, and genetic polymorphism. Am. Nat. 144:210-228.
19. Delph, L. F., J. Andicoechea, J. C. Steven, C. R. Herlihy, S. V. Scarpino, and D. L. Bell 2011. Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict in a dioecious plant. New Phytol. 192:542-552.
20. Ewens, W. J. 2004. Mathematical population genetics. I. Theoretical introduction. 2nd ed. Springer, New York
21. Ewens, W. J., and G. Thomson 1970. Heterozygote selective advantage. Ann. Hum. Genet. 33:365-376.
22. Eyre-Walker, A., and P. D. Keightley 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:610-618.
23. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau 2004. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429:65-67.
24. Felsenstein, J. 1976. Theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Ann. Rev. Genet. 10:253-280.
25. Fitzpatrick, M. J., E. Feder, L. Rowe, and M. B. Sokolowski 2007. Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447:210-212.
26. Foerster, K., T. Coulson, B. C. Sheldon, J. M. Pemberton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and L. E. B. Kruuk 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447:1107-1110.
27. Fry, J. D. 2010. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64:1510-1516.
28. Gavrilets, S., and W. R. Rice 2006. Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:3031-3038.
29. Gillespie, J. H. 1978. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. V. The SAS-CFF model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14:1-45.
30. Gillespie, J. H. 2000. Genetic drift in an infinite population: the pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155:909-919.
31. Golding, B. 1992. The prospects for polymorphisms shared between species. Heredity 68:263-276.
32. Haldane, J. B. S. 1924. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part I. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23:19-41.
33. Hedrick, P. W. 1986. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: a decade later. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:535-566.
34. Hedrick, P. W. 1999. Antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic polymorphism: a perspective. Heredity 82:126-133.
35. Hedrick, P. W. 2007. Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift. Evolution 61:2750-2771.
36. Hedrick, P. W., M. E. Ginevan, and E. P. Ewing 1976. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7:1-32.
37. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
38. Innocenti, P., and E. H. Morrow 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000335.
39. Kruuk, L. E. B., S. J. E. Baird, K. S. Gale, and N. H. Barton 1999. A comparison of multilocus clines maintained by environmental adaptation or by selection against hybrids. Genetics 153:1959-1971.
40. Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87:331-333.
41. Lewis, Z., N. Wedell, and J. Hunt 2011. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth. Evolution 65:2085-2097.
42. Livingstone, F. B. 1992. Polymorphism and differential selection for the sexes. Hum. Biol. 64:649-657.
43. Maynard Smith, J. 1971. What use is sex J. Theor. Biol. 30:319-335.
44. Maynard Smith, J., and J. Haigh 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. Camb. 23:23-35.
45. Mokkonen, M., H. Kokko, E. Koskela, J. Lehtonen, T. Mappes, H. Martiskainen, and S. C. Mills 2011. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science 334:972-974.
46. Mullon, C., A. Pomiankowski, and M. Reuter 2012. The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution, doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01728.x.
47. Nagylaki, T. 1979. Selection in dioecious populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 43:143-150.
48. Nielsen, R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39:197-218.
49. Patten, M. M., and D. Haig 2009. Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism at a sex-linked locus. Evolution 63:2888-2895.
50. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Moller 1995. The resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260:21-29.
51. Prout, T. 2000. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? Pp. 157-181 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K
52. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
53. Rice, S. H. 2004. Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland, MA
54. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
55. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale 2001. Intersexual ontogentic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14:685-693.
56. Robertson, A. 1962. Selection for heterozygotes in small populations. Genetics 47:129-1300.
57. Sabeti, P. C., D. E. Reich, J. M. Higgins, H. Z. P. Levine, D. J. Richter, S. F. Schaffner, S. B. Gabriel, J. V. Platko, N. J. Patterson, G. J. McDonald et al. 2002. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419:832-837.
58. Sabeti, P. C., S. F. Schaffner, B. Fry, J. Lohmueller, P. Varilly, O. Shamovsky, A. Palma, T. S. Mikkelsen, D. Altshuler, and E. S. Lander 2006. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. Science 312:1614-1620.
59. van Doorn, G. S. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1168:52-71.
60. Voight, B. F., S. Kudaravalli, X. Wen, and J. K. Pritchard 2006. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4:e72.
61. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. II: the theory of gene frequencies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
62. Wright, S., and T. Dobzhansky 1946. Genetics of natural populations. XII. Experimental reproduction of some of the changes caused by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 31:125-156.