Impact of presurgical breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical planning - A retrospective analysis from a private radiology group

Breast Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 134-141

  Fan, X Cynthia ^a   Nemoto, Takuma ^a   Blatto, Karen ^a   Mangiafesto, Emily ^a   Sundberg, Jodi ^a   Chen, Anna ^a   Foti, Anthony ^a   Holzhauer, Markus ^a   Lahr, Patrick ^a   Snitzer, Eric ^a   Summers, Thomas ^a   Wolf, David ^a   Sung, Janet ^a  

^a Windsong Radiology Group   (United States)

Author keywords

breast MRI; contralateral malignancy detection; presurgical planning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84874726114     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12076     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al,. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-303.
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al,. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8469-76.
3. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E,. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213: 881-8.
4. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D, et al,. Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92: 9-15.
5. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al,. (2003) MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 901-10.
6. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al,. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 333-41.
7. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al,. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-49.
8. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al,. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003; 226: 773-8.
9. Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, et al,. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 2009 Nov 20; 27 (33): 5640-9.
10. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, et al,. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007 Oct 15; 13 (20): 6144-52.
11. Pickles MD, Lowry M, Manton DJ, Gibbs P, Turnbullin LW,. Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91: 1-10.
12. Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, et al,. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Relevance of Breast Cancer Subtype. J Clin Onc 2011; 29: 660-6.
13. Goerres GW, Michel SC, Fehr MK, et al,. Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1635-44.
14. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al,. Accuracy and Surgical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Staging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Detection of Multifocal and Multicentric Cancer. J Clin Onc 2008; 26: 3248-58.
15. Houssami N, Hayes DF,. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: Should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59 (5): 290-302.
16. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang W, Harris EE, Schnall MD,. Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. J Clin Onc 2008; 26: 386-91.
17. Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, et al,. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1725-31.
18. Bernard JR, Vallow LA, et al,. In Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer, Screening MRI of the Contralateral Breast Detects Mammographically Occult Cancer, Even in Elderly Women: The Mayo Clinic in Florida Experience. Breast J. 2010 March; 16 (2): 118-26.
19. Bedrosian I, Mick R, et al,. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003; 98: 468-73.
20. Morrow M, Freedman G,. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 363-78.
21. Del Fratea Chiara, Borghesea Ludovica, Cedolinib Carla, et al,. Role of presurgical breast MRI in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. Breast J. 2007 Oct; 16 (5): 469-81.
22. Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, et al,. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 2007 May; 142 (5): 441-5.
23. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE,. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging. Am J Surg 2008 Sep; 196 (3): 389-97.
24. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al,. Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Clin Onc 2009; 27 (25): 4082-8.
25. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al,. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5203-9.
26. Habermann EB, Abbott A, parsons HM, et al,. Are Mastectomy Rates Really Increasing in the United States? J Clin Onc 2009; 28 (21) 3437-41.