Single amino acid substitutions in HXT2.4 from Scheffersomyces stipitis lead to improved cellobiose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1500-1507

  Ha, Suk Jin ^a,b   Kim, Heejin ^a   Lin, Yuping ^d   Jang, Myoung Uoon ^c   Galazka, Jonathan M ^d   Kim, Tae Jip ^c   Cate, Jamie H D ^d,e   Jin, Yong Su ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^c Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CELLOBIOSE; CELLODEXTRIN TRANSPORTERS; CHARGED AMINO ACIDS; ENGINEERED STRAINS; EXPRESSION LEVELS; GLUCOSIDASE; HEXOSE TRANSPORTERS; KINETIC PROPERTIES; NEGATIVELY CHARGED; NEUROSPORA CRASSA; POSITIVELY CHARGED; S.CEREVISIAE; SCHEFFERSOMYCES STIPITIS; WILD TYPES;

AMINO ACIDS; GENES; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

CELLOBIOSE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER; MUTANT PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MUTATION; PLASMID; YEAST;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCETALES; VIRUS CULTURE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CELLOBIOSE; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FERMENTATION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; MUTANT PROTEINS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SERIAL PASSAGE;

EID: 84874707022     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03253-12     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Wyman CE. 2007. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 25:153-157.
2. Carroll A, Somerville C. 2009. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60:165-182.
3. Stephanopoulos G. 2007. Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science 315:801- 804.
4. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T. 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484-489.
5. Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, Cate JH. 2010. Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 330:84-86.
6. Ha SJ, Galazka JM, Kim SR, Choi JH, Yang X, Seo JH, Glass NL, Cate JH, Jin YS. 2011. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:504 -509.
7. Ha SJ, Wei Q, Kim SR, Galazka JM, Cate JH, Jin YS. 2011. Cofermentation of cellobiose and galactose by an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5822-5825.
8. Saitoh S, Hasunuma T, Tanaka T, Kondo A. 2010. Co-fermentation of cellobiose and xylose using beta-glucosidase displaying diploid industrial yeast strain OC-2. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87:1975-1982.
9. van Rooyen R, Hahn-Hägerdal B, La Grange DC, van Zyl WH. 2005. Construction of cellobiose-growing and fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J. Biotechnol. 120:284 -295.
10. Kim SR, Ha SJ, Wei N, Oh EJ, Jin YS. 2012. Simultaneous cofermentation of mixed sugars: a promising strategy for producing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 30:274 -282.
11. Jeffries TW, Jin YS. 2000. Ethanol and thermotolerance in the bioconversion of xylose by yeasts. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 47:221-268.
12. Jeffries TW, Jin YS. 2004. Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63:495-509.
13. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Jeppsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2007. Metabolic engineering for pentose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 108:147-177.
14. Lee WJ, Ryu YW, Seo JH. 2000. Characterization of two-substrate fermentation processes for xylitol production using recombinant Saccharo-myces cerevisiae containing xylose reductase gene. Process Biochem. 35: 1199-1203.
15. Nelson SS, Headman Van Vleet JR, Jeffries TW. 2010. Engineered cellobiose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by expression of Pichia stipitis genes. 32nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Clearwater Beach, FL.
16. Sadie C, Rose SH, den Haan R, van Zyl WH. 2011. Co-expression of a cellobiose phosphorylase and lactose permease enables intracellular cellobiose utilisation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90:1373-1380.
17. Entian KD, Kotter P. 2007. Yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Methods Microbiol. 36:629-666.
18. Hosaka K, Nikawa J, Kodaki T, Yamashita S. 1992. A dominant mutation that alters the regulation of INO1 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biochem. 111:352-358.
19. Arendt CS, Ri K, Yates PA, Ullman B. 2007. Genetic selection for a highly functional cysteine-less membrane protein using site saturation mutagenesis. Anal. Biochem. 365:185-193.
20. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. 2009. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4:363-371.
21. Myers RM, Lerman LS, Maniatis T. 1985. A general method for saturation mutagenesis of cloned DNA fragments. Science 229:242-247.
22. Du J, Li S, Zhao H. 2010. Discovery and characterization of novel D-xylose-specific transporters from Neurospora crassa and Pichia stipitis. Mol. Biosyst. 6:2150 -2156.
23. Parekh SR, Parekh RS, Wayman M. 1988. Fermentation of xylose and cellobiose by Pichia stipitis and Brettanomyces clausenii. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 18:325-338.
24. Parekh S, Wayman M. 1986. Fermentation of cellobiose and wood sugars to ethanol by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis. Biotechnol. Lett. 8:597- 600.
25. Jeffries TW, Van Vleet JR. 2009. Pichia stipitis genomics, transcriptomics, and gene clusters. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:793- 807.
26. Steipe B. 1999. Evolutionary approaches to protein engineering. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 243:55- 86.
27. Sauer U. 2001. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 73:129 -169.
28. Cadière A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, Dequin S. 2011. Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab. Eng. 13:263- 271.
29. Cakar ZP, Seker UOS, Tamerler C, Sonderegger M, Sauer U. 2005. Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 5:569 -578.
30. Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. 2005. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 5:925-934.
31. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. 2009. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:907-914.
32. Sonderegger M, Sauer U. 2003. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1990 -1998.
33. Prade H, Mackenzie LF, Withers SG. 1997. Enzymatic synthesis of disaccharides using Agrobacterium sp. ß-glucosidase. Carbohydr. Res. 305:371-381.
34. Blanchard JE, Withers SG. 2001. Rapid screening of the aglycone specificity of glycosidases: applications to enzymatic synthesis of oligosaccharides. Chem. Biol. 8:627- 633.
35. +-coupled sugar translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:1518 -1524.
36. Kasahara T, Kasahara M. 2010. Identification of a key residue determining substrate affinity in the yeast glucose transporter Hxt7: a twodimensional comprehensive study. J. Biol. Chem. 285:26263-26268.
37. Young EM, Comer AD, Huang H, Alper HS. 2012. A molecular transporter engineering approach to improving xylose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 14:401- 411.