Analyzing the evolution of social exchange strategies in social preference-based MAS through an evolutionary spatial approach of the ultimatum game

Proceedings - 2012 Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation: Advances in Social Simulation II, BWSS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 83-90

  Macedo, Luís F K ^a   Dimuro, Graçaliz P ^a   Aguiar, Marilton S ^a,b   Costa, Antônio C R ^a   Mattos, Viviane L D ^a   Coelho, Helder ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Evolutionary Spatial Games; Social Exchange Strategies; Social Preference based MAS; Ultimatum Game

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE GOALS; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION GAMES; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; RESERVE VALUE; SOCIAL EXCHANGE; SOCIAL PREFERENCE; SOCIAL PREFERENCE-BASED MAS; SPATIAL GAMES; STRATEGY LEARNING; ULTIMATUM GAME; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

DECISION THEORY; ELECTRIC NETWORK TOPOLOGY; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84874694535     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BWSS.2012.26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. R. Emerson, "Social exchange theory," in Sociology, A. Inkeles, J. Colemen, and N. Smelser, Eds. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 1976, vol. 2, pp. 335-362.
2. J. Piaget, Sociological Studies. London: Routlege, 1995.
3. M. Rabin, "Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics," The American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1281-1302, 1993.
4. G. Dimuro and A. C. R. Costa, "Regulation of social exchanges in open MAS: the problem of reciprocal conversions between POMDPs and HMMs," in Proc. of the Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Agents, the 11th Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Valencia: IFAAMAS, 2012, pp. 1-8.
5. G. P. Dimuro, A. C. R. Costa, L. V. Gonçalves, and D. R. Pereira, "Recognizing and learning models of social exchange strategies for the regulation of social interactions in open agent societies," Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143-161, 2011.
6. B. Xianyu, "Social preference, incomplete information, and the evolution of ultimatum game in the small world networks: An agent-based approach," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13, p. 2, 2010.
7. A. U. Poulsen, "Information and endogenous first mover advantages in the ultimatum game: An evolutionary approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 129-143, 2007.
8. M. H. I. Franco, A. C. R. Costa, and H. Coelho, "Exchange values and social power supporting the choice of partners," Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, vol. 6, no. 9, 2010.
9. F. Grimaldo, M. Lozano, and F. Barber, "Coordination and sociability for intelligent virtual agents," in Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III, ser. LNAI. Berlin: Springer, 2007, vol. 4870, pp. 58-70.
10. M. R. Rodrigues and M. Luck, "Effective multiagent interactions for open cooperative systems rich in services," in Proc. 8th Intl. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Richland: IFAAMAS, 2009, pp. 1273-1274.
11. G. P. Dimuro, A. C. R. Costa, L. V. Gonçalves, and A. Hübner, "Centralized regulation of social exchanges between personality-based agents," in Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II, ser. LNCS. Berlin: Springer, 2007, vol. 4386, pp. 338-355.
12. G. P. Dimuro, A. C. R. Costa, and L. A. M. Palazzo, "Systems of exchange values as tools for multi-agent organizations," Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31-50, 2005.
13. D. R. Pereira, L. V. Gonçalves, G. P. Dimuro, and A. C. R. Costa, "Towards the self-regulation of personality-based social exchange processes in multiagent systems," in Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Proc. of 19th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, ser. LNCS, vol. 5249. Springer, 2008, pp. 113-123.
14. R. H. Bordini, J. F. Hübner, and M. Wooldrige, Programming Multiagent Systems in AgentSpeak Using Jason. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
15. L. P. Kaelbling, M. L. Littman, and A. R. Cassandra, "Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 101, no. 1-2, pp. 99-134, 1998.
16. I. L. MacDonald and W. Zucchini, Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete-valued Series. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1997.
17. G. I. Simari and S. Parsons, "On the relationship between MDPs and the BDI architecture," in Proceedings of the 5th Intl. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Hakodate, H. Nakashima, M. P. Wellman, G. Weiss, and P. Stone, Eds. ACM, 2006, pp. 1041-1048.
18. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of small-world networks," Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440-442, June 1998.
19. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
20. C. F. Camerer, T.-H. Ho, and J. K. Chong, "Behavioral game theory: Thinking, learning and teaching," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 19, pp. 7-42, 2001.
21. A. Rubinstein, "Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model," Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 97-110, 1982.
22. K. M. Page, M. A. Nowak, and K. Sigmund, "The spatial ultimatum game," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, vol. 267, no. 1458, pp. 2177-2182, 2000.
23. W. Güth, R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze, "An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 367-368, 1982.
24. W. Güth, C. Schmidt, and M. Sutter, "Bargaining outside the lab - a newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game," Economic Journal, vol. 117, no. 518, pp. 449-469, 2007. (Pubitemid 46563527)
25. H. Oosterbeek, R. Sloof, and G. van de Kuilen, "Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis," EconWPA, Experimental 0401003, 2004.
26. H. Oosterbeek, R. Sloof, and G. van de Kuilen, "Bargaining outside the lab - a newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game," Experimental Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 171-188, 2004.
27. G. E. Bolton and R. Zwick, "Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining," Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 95-121, 1995.
28. C. F. Camerer, Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton: University Press, 2003.
29. M. A. Nowak, K. M. Page, and K. Sigmund, "Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game." Science, vol. 289, no. 5485, pp. 1773-1775, 2000.
30. E. Lieberman, C. Hauert, and M. A. Nowak, "Evolutionary dynamics on graphs," Nature, vol. 433, no. 7023, pp. 312-316, 2005.
31. G. Szaba and G. Fáth, "Evolutionary games on graphs," Physics Reports, vol. 446, pp. 97-216, 2007.
32. E. Fehr and K. M. Schmidt, "A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 817-868, 1999.
33. J. Andreoni and J. Miller, "Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism," Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 737-753, 2002. (Pubitemid 34269067)
34. J. M. Alexander, "Evolutionary game theory," in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford Univ., 2009.
35. B. C. Bedregal, G. P. Dimuro, R. H. N. Santiago, and R. H. S. Reiser, "On interval fuzzy S-implications," Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 8, pp. 1373-1389, 2010.
36. G. P. Dimuro, B. C. Bedregal, R. H. N. Santiago, and R. H. S. Reiser, "Interval additive generators of interval t-norms and interval t-conorms," Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 18, pp. 3898-3916, 2011.