Going to the roots of dependency parsing

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 5-13

  Ballesteros, Miguel ^a   Nivre, Joakim ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS;

CONTROL EXPERIMENTS; DATA DRIVEN; DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DEPENDENCY TREES; GRAPH-BASED; ROOT NODES; SYNTACTIC PARSING;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84874636278     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/COLI_a_00132     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Attardi, Giuseppe and Felice Dell'Orletta. 2009. Reverse revision and linear tree combination for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT), pages 261-264, Boulder, CO.
2. Böhmová, Alena, Jan Hajič, Eva Hajičová, and Barbora Hladká. 2003. The Prague Dependency Treebank: A three-level annotation scenario. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer, pages 103-127.
3. Buchholz, Sabine and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 149-164, New York, NY.
4. de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 449-454, Genoa.
5. Hajič, Jan, Barbora Vidova Hladka, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Petr Sgall, and Petr Pajas. 2001. Prague Dependency Treebank 1.0. LDC, 2001T10.
6. Hall, Johan, Jens Nilsson, Joakim Nivre, Gülsen Eryi ǧit, Beáta Megyesi, Mattias Nilsson, and Markus Saers. 2007. Single malt or blended? A study in multilingual parser optimization. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 933-939, Prague.
7. Marcus, Mitchell P., Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
8. McDonald, Ryan. 2006. Discriminative Learning and Spanning Tree Algorithms for Dependency Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
9. McDonald, Ryan, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, and Jan Hajič. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pages 523-530, Vancouver.
10. Nivre, Joakim. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 149-160, Nancy.
11. Nivre, Joakim. 2004. Incrementality in deterministic dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together (ACL), pages 50-57, Barcelona.
12. Nivre, Joakim. 2006. Inductive Dependency Parsing. Springer, Berlin.
13. Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, Sandra Kübler, Ryan McDonald, Jens Nilsson, Sebastian Riedel, and Deniz Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 915-932, Prague.
14. Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2216-2219, Genoa.
15. Nivre, Joakim and Jens Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 99-106, Ann Arbor, MI.