Single malt or blended? A study in multilingual parser optimization

EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 933-939

  Hall, Johan ^a   Nilsson, Jens ^a   Nivre, Joakim ^a,b   Eryiǧit, Gülşen ^c   Megyesi, Beáta ^b   Nilsson, Mattias ^b   Saers, Markus ^b  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSING; ENSEMBLE SYSTEMS; FEATURE MODELS; IN-BUILDINGS; OPTIMAL PARAMETER; OPTIMIZING PARAMETERS; PARSING ALGORITHM; TEST SETS; TWO STAGE OPTIMIZATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053373057     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. A. Abeillé, editor. 2003. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer.
2. I. Aduriz, M. J. Aranzabe, J. M. Arriola, A. Atutxa, A. Diaz de Ilarraza, A. Garmendia, and M. Oronoz. 2003. Construction of a Basque dependency treebank. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 201-204.
3. A. Böhmová, J. Hajič, E. Hajičová, and B. Hladká. 2003. The PDT: a 3-level annotation scenario. In Abeilĺe (2003), chapter 7, pages 103-127.
4. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, 2001. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
5. K. Chen, C. Luo, M. Chang, F. Chen, C. Chen, C. Huang, and Z. Gao. 2003. Sinica treebank: Design criteria, representational issues and implementation. In Abeilĺe (2003), chapter 13, pages 231-248.
6. M. A. Covington. 2001. A fundamental algorithm for dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 39th Annual ACM Southeast Conf., pages 95-102.
7. D. Csendes, J. Csirik, T. Gyimóthy, and A. Kocsor. 2005. The Szeged Treebank. Springer.
8. J. Hajič, O. Smřz, P. Zemánek, J. Š naidauf, and E. Beška. 2004. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR Intern. Conf. on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117.
9. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2007. Extended constituent-to-dependency conversion for English. In Proc. of the 16th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA).
10. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
11. M. A. Martí, M. Taulé, L. Màrquez, and M. Bertran. 2007. CESS-ECE: A multilingual and multilevel annotated corpus. Available for download from: http://www.lsi.upc.edu/mbertran/cess-ece/.
12. R. McDonald and J. Nivre. 2007. Characterizing the errors of data-driven dependency parsing models. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL).
13. R. McDonald, F. Pereira, K. Ribarov, and J. Hajič. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conf. and the Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pages 523-530.
14. S. Montemagni, F. Barsotti, M. Battista, N. Calzolari, O. Corazzari, A. Lenci, A. Zampolli, F. Fanciulli, M. Massetani, R. Raffaelli, R. Basili, M. T. Pazienza, D. Saracino, F. Zanzotto, N. Nana, F. Pianesi, and R. Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank. In Abeilĺe (2003), chapter 11, pages 189-210.
15. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 99-106.
16. J. Nivre, J. Hall, J. Nilsson, G. Eryiǧit, and S. Marinov. 2006. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In Proc. of the Tenth Conf. on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 221-225.
17. J. Nivre, J. Hall, S. Kübler, R. McDonald, J. Nilsson, S. Riedel, and D. Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL).
18. J. Nivre. 2007. Incremental non-projective dependency parsing. In Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-HLT), pages 396-403.
19. K. Oflazer, B. Say, D. Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeilĺe (2003), chapter 15, pages 261-277.
20. P. Prokopidis, E. Desypri, M. Koutsombogera, H. Papageorgiou, and S. Piperidis. 2005. Theoretical and practical issues in the construction of a Greek dependency treebank. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 149-160.
21. K. Sagae and A. Lavie. 2006. Parser combination by reparsing. In Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 129-132.
22. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proc. 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 195-206.