Hydrogen Bond Strengths in Phosphorylated and Sulfated Amino Acid Residues

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Rapp, Chaya ^a   Klerman, Hadassa ^a   Levine, Emily ^a   McClendon, Christopher L ^b  

^a YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; GLUTAMIC ACID; PHOSPHOSERINE; PHOSPHOTYROSINE; SULFOTYROSINE; TRIPEPTIDE; TYROSINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AMINO ACID; PEPTIDE; PHOSPHATE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SOLVENT; TYROSINE; TYROSINE O-SULFATE;

ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLEX FORMATION; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROGEN BOND STRENGTH; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SULFATION; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROCESSING; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

AMINO ACIDS; ARGININE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GLUTAMIC ACID; HUMANS; HYDROGEN BONDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PEPTIDES; PHOSPHATES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHOSPHOSERINE; PHOSPHOTYROSINE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TYROSINE;

EID: 84874588353     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057804     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mandell DJ, Chorny I, Groban ES, Wong SE, Levine E, et al. (2007) Strengths of hydrogen bonds involving phosphorylated amino acid side chains. J Am Chem Soc 129: 820-827.
2. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S, (2002) The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 98: 1912-1934.
3. Sun Q, Ng C, Guy GR, Sivaraman J, (2011) An adjacent arginine, and the phosphorylated tyrosine in the c-Met receptor target sequence, dictates the orientation of c-Cbl binding. FEBS Lett 585: 281-285.
4. Waksman G, Kominos D, Robertson SC, Pant N, Baltimore D, et al. (1992) Crystal structure of the phosphotyrosine recognition domain SH2 of v-src complexed with tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides. Nature 358: 646-653.
5. Choe H, Farzan M, (2009) Tyrosine sulfation of HIV-1 coreceptors and other chemokine receptors. Methods in enzymology: Chemokines, part B 46: 147-170.
6. Farzan M, Mirzabekov T, Kolchinsky P, Wyatt R, Cayabyab M, et al. (1999) Tyrosine sulfation of the amino terminus of CCR5 facilitates HIV-1 entry. Cell 96: 667-676.
7. Cormier EG, Persuh M, Thompson DAD, Lin SW, Sakmar TP, et al. (2000) Specific interaction of CCR5 amino-terminal domain peptides containing sulfotyrosines with HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 5762-5767.
8. Gettins P, (1989) Absence of Large-scale Conformational Change upon Limited Proteolysis of Ovalbumin, the Prototypic Serpin. J Biol Chem 264: 3781-3785.
9. Singer AU, Forman-Kay JD, (1997) pH Titration studies of an SH2 domain- phosphopeptide complex: Unusual histidine and phosphate pKa values. Prot Sci 6: 1910-1919.
10. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
11. Veldkamp CT, Seibert C, Peterson FC, De la Cruz NB, Haugner JC 3rd, et al (2008) Structural basis of CXCR4 sulfotyrosine recognition by the chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12. Sci Signal 1(37): ra4.
12. Jaguar Version 7.6. New York: Schrodinger Inc.; 2007.
13. Tannor DJ, Marten B, Murphy R, Friesner RA, Sitkoff D, et al. (1994) Accurate First Principles Calculation of Molecular Charge Distributions and Solvation Energies from Ab Initio Quantum Mechanics and Continuum Dielectric Theory. J Am Chem Soc 116: 11875-11882.
14. Bowers KJ, Chow E, Xu H, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, et al. (2006) Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06), Tampa Florida.
15. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J, (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118: 11225-11236.
16. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL, (2001) Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105: 6474-6487.
17. Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma T, (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 91: 6269.
18. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K, (1996) VMD- visual molecular dynamics. J Molec Graphics 14: 33-38.
19. Maestro, Version 9.1.107. New York: Schrodinger Inc.; 2007.
20. Macromodel, Version 9.1.107. New York: Schrodinger Inc.; 2007.
21. Nicholls A, Honig B, (1991) A Rapid Finite-Difference Algorithm utilizing successive over-relaxation to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation. J Comput Chem 12: 435-445.
22. Jacobson MP, Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Rapp C, (2002) Force field validation using protein side chain prediction. J Phys Chem B 106: 11673-11680.
23. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp C, Day TJF, Honig B, et al. (2004) A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 55: 351-367.
24. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR, (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81: 3684-3690.
25. Martyna GJ, Tobias DJ, Klein ML, (1994) Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J Chem Phys 101: 4177-4189.
26. Hoover WG, (1985) Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 31: 1695-1697.
27. Tuckerman M, Berne BJ, Martyna GJ, (1992) Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics J Chem Phys. 97: 1990-2001.
28. Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, et al. (2005) GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26: 1701-18.
29. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA, (2001) Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10037-10041.
30. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4 Schrödinger, LLC.
31. Ma JC, Dougherty DA, (1997) The cation-pi interaction. Chem Rev 97: 1303-1324.
32. Gallivan JP, Dougherty DA, (1999) Cation-π Interactions in structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9459-9464.
33. Schaefer SA, Dong M, Rubensteon RP, Wilkie WA, Bahnson BJ, et al. (2012) 77Se Enrichment of Proteins Expands the Biological NMR Toolbox. J Mol Biol. in press.
34. Sychrovsky V, Sponer J, Trantirek L, Schneider B, (2006) Indirect NMR Spin-Spin Coupling Constants 3J(P,C) and 2J(P,H) across the P-O-H-C Link Can Be Used for Structure Determination of Nucleic Acids. J Am Chem Soc 128: 6823-6828.
35. Zandarashvili L, Li DW, Wang T, Brunschweiler R, Iwahara J, (2011) Signature of Mobile Hydrogen Bonding of Lysine Side Chains from Long-Range 15N-13C J-Couplings and Computation. J Am Chem Soc 133: 9192-9195.
36. Cornilescu G, Ramierz BE, Frank K, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, et al. (1999) Correlation between 3hJNC' and Hydrogen Bond Length in Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 121: 6275-6279.
37. Grzesiek S, Cordier F, Jaravine V, Barfield M, (2004) Insights into biomolecular hydrogen bonds from hydrogen bond scalar couplings. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 45: 275-300.
38. Kofuku Y, Yoshiura C, Ueda T, Terasawa H, Hirai T, et al. (2009) Structural Basis of the Interaction between Chemokine Cell-derived Factor-1/CXCL12 and its G-protein coupled Receptor CXCR4. J Biol Chem 284: 35240-35250.