A polyphasic approach for assessing the suitability of bioremediation for the treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted soil

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 450-451, Issue , 2013, Pages 51-58

  Adetutu, Eric M ^a,b,c   Smith, Renee J ^a   Weber, John ^b,c   Aleer, Sam ^b,c   Mitchell, James G ^a   Ball, Andrew S ^a,d   Juhasz, Albert L ^b,c  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c Remediation of the Environment ^*  (Australia)

^d RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

454 pyrosequencing; AlkB; Bioaccessibility; Bioavailability; Endpoint predictions; Pilot scale studies

Indexed keywords

454-PYROSEQUENCING; ALKB; BIOACCESSIBILITY; BIOAVAILABILITY; ENDPOINT PREDICTION; PILOT-SCALE STUDY;

BACTERIA; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DEGRADATION; FORECASTING; MICROBIOLOGY; NATURAL ATTENUATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOILS;

HYDROCARBONS;

2 HYDROXYPROPYL BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; HYDROCARBON; PROPANOL;

BACTERIUM; BIOASSAY; BIOAVAILABILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOINDICATOR; BIOREMEDIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HYDROCARBON; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION;

ALKB GENE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BURKHOLDERIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; EXTRACTION; GENE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GORDONIA; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MYCOBACTERIUM; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS; PYROSEQUENCING;

AUSTRALIA; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CHEMICAL FRACTIONATION; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDROCARBONS; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PILOT PROJECTS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84874537715     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aburto-Medina A., Adetutu E.M., Aleer S., Weber J., Patil S.S., Sheppard P.J., et al. Comparison of indigenous and exogenous microbial populations during slurry phase biodegradation of long-term hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 2012, 1-10.
2. Adetutu E.M., Ball A.S., Weber J., Aleer S., Dandie C.E., Juhasz A.L. Impact of bacterial and fungal processes on 14C-hexadecane mineralisation in weathered hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 2012, 414:585-591.
3. Aleer S., Adetutu E.M., Makadia T.H., Patil S., Ball A.S. Harnessing the hydrocarbon-degrading potential of contaminated soils for the bioremediation of waste engine oil. Water Air Soil Pollut 2011, 218:121-130.
4. Aspray T.J., Carvalho D.J.C., Philp J.C. Application of soil slurry respirometry to optimize and subsequently monitor ex situ bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2007, 60:279-284.
5. Bell T.H., Yergeau E., Martineau C., Juck D., Whyte L.G., Greer C.W. Identification of nitrogen-incorporating bacteria in petroleum-contaminated arctic soils by using [15N] DNA-based stable isotope probing and pyrosequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:4163-4171.
6. Beller H.R., Kane S.R., Legler T.C., Alvarez P.J.J. A real-time polymerase chain reaction method for monitoring anaerobic, hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria based on a catabolic gene. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:3977-3984.
7. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Methodol 1995, 57:289-300.
8. Bento F.M., Camargo F.A.O., Okeke B.C., Frankenberger W.T. Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96:1049-1055.
9. Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74:63-67.
10. Dandie C.E., Weber J., Aleer S., Adetutu E.M., Ball A.S., Juhasz A.L. Assessment of five bioaccessibility assays for predicting the efficacy of petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation in aged contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2010, 81:1061-1068.
11. De La Huz R., Lastra M., Junoy J., Castellanos C., Viéitez J.M. Biological impacts of oil pollution and cleaning in the intertidal zone of exposed sandy beaches: preliminary study of the "prestige" oil spill. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2005, 65:19-29.
12. Dinsdale E.A., Edwards R.A., Hall D., Angly F., Breitbart M., Brulc J.M., et al. Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes. Nature 2008, 452:629-633.
13. Diplock E.E., Mardlin D.P., Killham K.S., Paton G.I. Predicting bioremediation of hydrocarbons: laboratory to field scale. Environ Pollut 2009, 157:1831-1840.
14. dos Santos H.F., Cury J.C., do Carmo F.L., dos Santos A.L., Tiedje J., van Elsas J.D., et al. Mangrove bacterial diversity and the impact of oil contamination revealed by pyrosequencing: bacterial proxies for oil pollution. PLoS One 2011, 6:e16943.
15. Erkelens M., Adetutu E.M., Taha M., Tudararo-Aherobo L., Antiabong J., Provatas A., et al. Sustainable remediation - the application of bioremediated soil for use in the degradation of TNT chips. J Environ Manage 2012, 110:69-76.
16. Fisher W.D. On grouping for maximum homogeneity. J Am Stat Assoc 1958, 53:789-798.
17. Girvan M.S., Bullimore J., Pretty J.N., Osborn A.M., Ball A.S. Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 69:1800-1809.
18. Hamamura N., Fukui M., Ward D.M., Inskeep W.P. Assessing soil microbial populations responding to crude-oil amendment at different temperatures using phylogenetic, functional gene (alkB) and physiological analyses. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:7580-7586.
19. Hatzinger P.B., Alexander M. Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 1995, 29:537-545.
20. Jeffries T.C., Seymour J.R., Gilbert J.A., Dinsdale E.A., Newton K., Leterme S.S.C., et al. Substrate type determines metagenomic profiles from diverse chemical habitats. PLoS One 2011, 6:e25173. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025173.
21. Kostka J.E., Prakash O., Overholt W.A., Green S.J., Freyer G., Canion A., et al. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the deepwater horizon oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:7962-7974.
22. Leahy J.G., Colwell R.R. Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev 1990, 54:305-315.
23. Levy J.K., Gopalakrishnan C. Promoting ecological sustainability and community resilience in the US Gulf Coast after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. J Nat Resour Policy Res 2010, 2:297-315.
24. Liu C. Bacterial diversity and heterotrophic biodegradation rate from coastal marshes in Gulf of Mexico. GSA Annual meeting in Minneapolis 2011, 43:584. Geological Society of America, USA.
25. Makadia T.H., Adetutu E.M., Simons K.L., Jardine D., Sheppard P.J., Ball A.S. Re-use of remediated soils for the bioremediation of waste oil sludge. J Environ Manage 2011, 92:866-871.
26. Mason O.U., Hazen T.C., Borglin S., Chain P.S.G., Dubinsky E.A., Fortney J.L., et al. Metagenome, metatranscriptome and single-cell sequencing reveal microbial response to Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ISME J 2012.
27. Meyer F., Paarmann D., D'Souza M., Olsem R., Glass E.M., Kubal M., et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:1-8.
28. Mohn W.W., Radziminski C.Z., Fortin M.C., Reimer K.J. On site bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic tundra soils in inoculated biopiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001, 57:242-247.
29. Muyzer G., De Waal E.C., Uitterlinden A.G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59:695-700.
30. Newcombe R.G. Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Stat Med 1998, 17:2635-2650.
31. Nikolopoulou M., Kalogerakis N. Biostimulation strategies for fresh and chronically polluted marine environments with petroleum hydrocarbons. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2009, 84:802-807.
32. Overbeek R., Begley T., Butler R.M., Choudhuri J.V., Chuang H., Cohoon M., et al. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:5691-5702.
33. Parks D.H., Beiko R.G. Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:715-721.
34. Pollard S.J.T., Hrudey S.E., Fedorak P.M. Bioremediation of petroleum- and creosote-contaminated soils: a review of constraints. Waste Manag Res 1994, 12:173-194.
35. Ramírez M.E., Zapién B., Zegarra H.G., Rojas N.G., Fernández L.C. Assessment of hydrocarbon biodegradability in clayed and weathered polluted soils. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2009, 63:347-353.
36. Riser-Roberts E. Remediation of petroleum contaminated soils; biological, physical and chemical processes 1998, 542. Lewis publishers, CRC Press, U.S.A.
37. Rocchetti L., Beolchini F., Ciani M., Dell'Anno A. Improvement of bioremediation performance for the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sediments. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2011, 2011:1-8.
38. Rowell D.L. Soil science: methods and applications 1994, Longman Scientific and Technical, U.K., [350 pp.].
39. Sanscartier D., Reimer K., Koch I., Laing T., Zeeb B. An investigation of the ability of a 14C-labeled hydrocarbon mineralization test to predict bioremediation of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioremediat J 2009, 13:92-101.
40. Semple K.T., Morriss A.W.J., Paton G.I. Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis. Eur J Soil Sci 2003, 54:809-818.
41. Semple K.T., Doick K.J., Wick L.Y., Harms H. Microbial interactions with organic contaminants in soil: definitions, processes and measurement. Environ Pollut 2007, 150:166-176.
42. Silva-Castro G., SantaCruz-Calvo L., Uad I., Perucha C., Laguna J., Gónzalez-López J., et al. Treatment of diesel-polluted clay soil employing combined biostimulation in microcosms. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2012, 9:535-542.
43. Smits T.H.M., Röthlisberger M., Witholt B., Van Beilen J.B. Molecular screening for alkane hydroxylase genes in Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains. Environ Microbiol 1999, 1:307-317.
44. Stallwood B., Shears J., Williams P.A., Hughes K.A. Low temperature bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil using biostimulation and bioaugmentation with a Pseudomonas sp. from maritime Antarctica. J Appl Microbiol 2005, 99:794-802.
45. Sun M., Luo Y., Teng Y., Jia Z., Li Z., Deng S. Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and metal-contaminated soil by successive methyl-β-cyclodextrin-enhanced soil washing-microbial augmentation: a laboratory evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2012, 1-11.
46. Tahhan R.A., Ammari T.G., Goussous S.J., Al-Shdaifat H.I. Enhancing the biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons in oily sludge by a modified bioaugmentation strategy. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2011, 65:130-134.
47. Towell M.G., Bellarby J., Paton G.I., Coulon F., Pollard S.J.T., Semple K.T. Mineralisation of target hydrocarbons in three contaminated soils from former refinery facilities. Environ Pollut 2011, 159:515-523.
48. Van Beilen J.B., Funhoff E.G. Alkane hydroxylases involved in microbial alkane degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 74:13-21.
49. Viñas M., Sabaté J., Espuny M.J., Solanas A.M. Bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation during bioremediation of heavily creosote-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:7008-7018.
50. Yergeau E., Sanschagrin S., Beaumier D., Greer C.W. Metegenomic analysis of the bioremediation of diesel contaminated Canadian high arctic soils. PLoS One 2012, 7:e30058.