Refining the DNA barcode for land plants

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 49, 2011, Pages 19451-19452

  Hollingsworth, Peter M ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 2; NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

DNA BARCODING; EMBRYOPHYTA; FUNGAL CONTAMINATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE SEQUENCE; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; GYMNOSPERMS;

EID: 83755173031     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116812108     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313-321. (Pubitemid 36228536)
2. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14812-14817. (Pubitemid 39410757)
3. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12794-12797.
4. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 6: e19254.
5. Li D-Z, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19641-19646.
6. Baldwin BG (1992) Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from the compositae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1:3-16.
7. Álvarez I, Wendel JF (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:417-434. (Pubitemid 37491888)
8. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8369-8374. (Pubitemid 40803501)
9. Chen S, et al. (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5:e8613.
10. Roy S, et al. (2010) Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: A case study with Indian berberis species. PLoS ONE 5:e13674.
11. Muellner AN, Schaefer H, Lahaye R (2011) Evaluation of candidate DNA barcoding loci for economically important timber species of the mahogany family (Meliaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 11:450-460.
12. Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol Evol 24:386-393.
13. Steele PR, Pires JC (2011) Biodiversity assessment: State-of-the-art techniques in phylogenomics and species identification. Am J Bot 98:415-425.
14. Chase MW, et al. (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1889-1895. (Pubitemid 44365049)
15. Bell D, et al. (2011) DNA barcoding European Herbertus (Marchantiopsida, Herbertaceae) and the discovery and description of a new species. Mol Ecol Resour, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03053.x.
16. Kesanakurti PR, et al. (2011) Spatial patterns of plant diversity below-ground as revealed by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol 20:1289-1302.
17. Stoeckle MY, et al. (2011) Commercial teas highlight plant DNA barcode identification successes and obstacles. Nat Sci Rep 1:42.