What do children with specific language impairment do with multiple forms of DO?

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 222-235

  Rice, Mabel L ^a   Blossom, Megan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Language assessment; Morphology; Specific language impairment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; LANGUAGE TESTS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 84874527585     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0107)     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brown, R. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Burgemeister, B. B., Blum, L. H., & Lorge, I. 1972. The Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
3. Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Evans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. 2009. Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 321-335.
7. Gathercole, S. E. 2006. Complexities and constraints in non-word repetition and word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 599-614.
8. Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. 2000. Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation-2. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
9. Guasti, M. T. 2002. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Guasti, M. T., Thornton, R., &Wexler, K. 1995. Negation in children's questions: The case of English. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), BUCLD 19 Proceedings (pp. 228-239). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
11. Hadley, P., & Rice, M. 1996. Emergent uses of BE and DO: Evidence from children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 5, 209-243.
12. Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to government and binding theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
13. Hresko, W. P., Reid, D. K., & Hammill, D. D. 1991. The Test of Early Language Development-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14. Hresko, W. P., Reid, D. K., & Hammill, D. D. 1999. The Test of Early Language Development-3. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15. Ingram, D. 1989. First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Leonard, L. B. 1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Leonard, L. B., Eyer, J. A., Bedore, L. M., & Grela, B. G. 1997. Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741-753.
18. Lightfoot, D. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. 2002. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts [Computer software]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Language Analysis Laboratory.
20. Morehead, D. M., & Ingram, D. 1973. The development of base syntax in normal and linguistically deviant children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 330-352.
21. Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. 1988. Test of Language Development 2-Primary (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
22. Oetting, J. B., & McDonald, J. L. 2001. Nonmainstream dialect use and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 207-283.
23. Paradis, J., Rice, M. L., Crago, M., & Marquis, J. 2008. The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 689-722.
24. Pollock, J. Y. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365-424.
25. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartik, J. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, England: Longman.
26. Rice, M. L. 2003. A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 63-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Rice, M. L., & Bode, J. 1993. GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language, 13, 113-131.
28. Rice, M. L., Hoffman, L., & Wexler, K. 2009. Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of SLI to fifteen years: A study of growth and asymptote. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1417-1433.
29. Rice, M., Redmond, S., & Hoffman, L. 2006. MLU in children with SLI and younger controls shows concurrent validity, stable and parallel growth trajectories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 793-808.
30. Rice, M. L., Smith, S. D., & Gayán, J. 2009. Convergent genetic linkage and associations to language, speech and reading measures in families of probands with specific language impairment. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1, 284-282.
31. Rice, M., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. 2010. Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3-9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 333-349.
32. Rice, M., & Wexler, K. 1996. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239-1257.
33. Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. 2001. Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
34. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. 1995. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850-863.
35. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. 1998. Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412-1431.
36. Rowland, C. F. 2007. Explaining errors in children's questions. Cognition, 104, 106-134.
37. Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M., &Theakston, A. L. 2005. The incidence of error in young children's wh-questions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 384-404.
38. Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Somashekar, S., & Lust, B. 2002. Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no question: Dissociating movement and inflection. Journal of Child Language, 29, 813-842.
39. Schütze, C. T. 2010. The status of nonagreeing Don't and theories of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 17, 235-271.
40. Snyder, W. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41. Snyder, W. (2011, November). Children's grammatical conservatism: Implications for syntactic theory. In N. Danis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1-20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
42. Stromswold, K. J. 1990. Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/
43. Tomblin, J. B., Mainela-Arnold, E., & Zhang, X. 2007. Procedural learning in children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language Learning and Development, 3, 269-293.
44. Watkins, R. V., Rice, M. L., & Moltz, C. C. 1993. Verb use by language-impaired and normally developing children. First Language, 13, 133-143.
45. Wexler, K. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23-79.
46. Wexler, K. 2003. Lenneberg's dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 11-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Wexler, K. 2011. Grammatical computation in the optional infinitive stage. In J. deVilliers&T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition: Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (pp. 53-118). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
48. Wexler, K., Schütze, C., & Rice, M. L. 1998. Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns omission model. Language Acquisition, 7, 317-344.