Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online

Communication Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 215-236

  Park, Yong Jin ^a  

^a HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

digital divide; information control; Internet privacy; skills; surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874514970     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650211418338     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Acquisti A.,Grosslags J.Privacy and rationality in decision making.IEEE Security and Privacy. 2005;3 (1): 26-33.
2. AcquistiA.GrossR. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti/papers/acquisti-gross-facebook-privacy-PET-final.pdf.
3. Agre P.Technology and privacy: The new landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
4. Ball K.,Webster F.The intensification of surveillance. London, UK: Pluto Press; 2003:.
5. BarnesS. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html.
6. Bellotti V.,Samarajiva R.Technology and privacy: The new landscape. Agre P.Rotenberg M., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:277-310.
7. boydD.HargittaiE. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares?First Monday, 15(8). Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3086/2589.
8. Bunz U.Growing from computer literacy towards computer-mediated communication competence: Evolution of a field and evaluation of a new measurement instrument.Information Technology, Education, and Society. 2004;4 (2): 53-84.
9. Castells M.The rise of network society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1996:.
10. Culnan M.Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing.Journal of Direct Marketing. 1995;9 (2): 10-19.
11. Culnan M.,Armstrong P.Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation.Organization Science. 1999;10:104-115.
12. Debatin B.,Lovejoy J.,Horn A.,Hughes B.Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2009;15 (1): 83-108.
13. DiMaggio P.,Hargittai E.,Neuman W. R.,Robinson J. P.Social implications of the Internet.Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:307-336.
14. Dommeyer C. J.,Gross B.Consumer knowledge, awareness, and use of privacy protection strategies.Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2003;17 (2): 34-51.
15. Dutton W.,Anderson R.Computers and literacy: Differing perspectives in the social sciences.Social Science Computer Review. 1989;7 (1): 1-5.
16. Federal Communications Commission. (2010). May 2010 wired and wireless Internet survey. Retrieved from http://blog.broadband.gov/?entryId=479436.
17. Federal Trade Commission. (2009). Self-regulatory principles for online behavioral advertising: Tracking, targeting, and technology. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/02/P085400behavadreport.pdf.
18. Fogel J.,Nehmad E.Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concern.Computers in Human Behavior. 2009;25 (1): 153-160.
19. FoxS. (2000). Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2000/PIP_Trust_Privacy_Report.pdf.pdf.
20. Freese J.,Rivas S.,Hargittai E.Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults.Poetics. 2006;34:236-249.
21. Goffman E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books, University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre; 1959:.
22. Graeff T. R.,Harmon S.Collecting and using personal data: Consumers' awareness and concerns.Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2002;19:302-318.
23. HargittaiE. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942/864.
24. Hargittai E.Internet access and use in context.New Media and Society. 2004;6 (1): 137-143.
25. Hargittai E.Survey measures of Web-oriented digital literacy.Social Science Computer Review. 2005;23:371-379.
26. Hargittai E.Cyberworld unlimited. Kutscher N.Otto H., ed. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften GWV/Fachverlage GmbH; 2007:121-137.
27. Hargittai E.An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy.Social Science Computer Review. 2009;27 (1): 130-137.
28. Hargittai E.,Hinnant A.Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet.Communication Research. 2008;35:602-621.
29. Hoffman D.,Novak T.,Peralta M.Information privacy in the marketplace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the web.Information Society. 1999;15 (2): 129-139.
30. JenkinsH. (2006, Winter). Game on! The future of literacy education in a participatory media culture. Threshold. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/cms/People/henry3/publications.html.
31. Kwak N.Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis.Communication Research. 1999;26:385-413.
32. Kwak N.,Skoric M.,Williams A.,Poor N.To broadband or not to broadband: The relationship between high-speed internet and knowledge and participation.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2004;48:420-445.
33. LaRose R.,Rifon N.Promoting i-safety: Effects of privacy seals on risk assessment and online privacy behavior.Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2007;41 (1): 127-149.
34. Lewis K.,Kaufman J.,Christakis N.The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2008;14 (1): 79-100.
35. Loges B.,Jung J.Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age.Communication Research. 2001;28:536-562.
36. Marx G.A tack in the shoe: Neutralizing and resisting the new surveillance.Journal of Social Issues. 2003;59:369-390.
37. MetzgerM. J. (2004). Exploring the barriers to electronic commerce: Privacy, trust, and disclosure online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/metzger.html.
38. Milne G.,Rome A.Consumer privacy and name removal across direct marketing channels: Exploring opt-in and opt-out alternatives.Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 2000;19:238-249.
39. Neuman R.The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986:.
40. Neuman R.The future of the mass audience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
41. Nowak G.,Phelps J.Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when privacy matters.Journal of Interactive Marketing. 1997;11 (4): 94-108.
42. Park Y. J.Privacy regime, culture, and user practices in the cyber marketplaces.Info. 2008;10 (2): 52-74.
43. Pew Internet. (2007). Teens, privacy & online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf.pdf.
44. Pool I. D.Technologies of freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 1983:.
45. Resnick R.HCI in new millennium. Carroll J., ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 2002:242-272.
46. Sheehan K. B.,Hoy M. G.Flaming, complaining, abstaining: How online users respond to privacy concerns.Journal of Advertising. 1998;28 (3): 37-51.
47. Solove D.The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the Internet. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2007:.
48. Turow J.Americans and online privacy: The system is broken. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 2003:.
49. Turow J.,Feldman L.,Meltzer K.Open to exploitation: American shoppers online and offline. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 2005:.
50. Turow J.,Hennessy M.Internet privacy and institutional trust: Insights from a national survey.New Media & Society. 2007;9:300-318.
51. van Dijk J.The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London, UK: SAGE; 2005:.