The influence of societal values on attitudes towards immigration

International Political Science Review

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 210-226

  Arikan, Gizem ^a   Ben Nun Bloom, Pazit ^a  

^a YASAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ambivalence; attitudes towards immigration; Heteroskedastic Maximum Likelihood Regression; societal values; values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874503948     PISSN: 01925121     EISSN: 1460373X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192512111411210     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alvarez MR,Brehm J.American ambivalence toward abortion policy: development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values.American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39 (4): 1055-1082.
2. Alvarez MR,Brehm J.Are Americans ambivalent towards racial policies?.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;92 (2): 345-374.
3. Alvarez MR,Brehm JHard Choices, Easy Answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002:.
4. Barsalou LWConcepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Neisser U, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:101-140.
5. Basinger SJ,Lavine H.Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice.American Political Science Review. 2005;99 (2): 169-184.
6. Bassili JM.Meta-judgmental versus operative indices of psychological properties: the case of measures of altitude strength.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;71:637-653.
7. Bellah RN,Madsen R,Sullivan WM,Swidler A,Tipton SMHabits of the Heart; Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley CA: University of California Press; 1995:.
8. Ben-Nun Bloom P,Arikan G.A two-edged sword: the differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy.Political Psychology. 2011;32 (4): 643-665.
9. Ben-Nun Bloom P,Levitan LC.We're closer than I thought: social network heterogeneity, morality and political persuasion.Political Psychology. forthcoming;:.
10. Ben-Nun Bloom P,Zemach M,Arian A.The religious experience as affecting ambivalence: the case of democratic performance evaluation in Israel.Democratization. 2011;18 (1): 25-51.
11. Benito MEuropean Immigration: A Sourcebook. Triandafyllidou AGropas R, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:335-346.
12. Berelson BR,Lazarsfeld PF,McPhee WNVoting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: Universuity of Chicago Press; 1954:.
13. Blekesaune M,Quadagno J.Public attitudes towards welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations.European Sociological Review. 2003;19:415-427.
14. Cacioppo JT,Berntson G.Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on separability of positive and negative sub-strates.Psychological Bulletin. 1994;115 (3): 401-423.
15. Cotesta V.Mass media, ethnic conflicts and migration: a research on Italian newspapers in the nineties.Studi Emigrazione. 1999;135:387-499.
16. Davidov E,Meuleman B,Billiet J,Schmidt P.Values and support for immigration: a cross-country comparison.European Sociological Review. 2008a;24 (5): 583-599.
17. Davidov E,Schmidt P,Schwartz SH.Bringing values back in: the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008b;72 (3): 420-455.
18. DiMaggio P.Culture and cognition.Annual Review of Sociology. 1997;23:263-287.
19. Eagly AH,Chaiken SThe Psychology of Attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1993:.
20. Feldman SPolitical Judgment: Structure and Process. Lodge MMcGraw K, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1995:249-270.
21. Feldman SOxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Sears DOHuddy LJervis R, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003:477-509.
22. Feldman S,Zaller JR.The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state.American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36 (1): 268-307.
23. Festinger L.A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations. 1954;7 (2): 117-140.
24. Franklin C.Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of US Senate candidates.American Political Science Review. 1991;85 (4): 1193-1214.
25. Gamson WATalking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
26. Green E.Who can enter? A multilevel analysis on public support for immigration criteria across 20 European countries.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2009;12 (1): 41-60.
27. Hagelund A.Problematizing culture: discourses on integration in Norway.Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2002;3 (3/4): 401-415.
28. Hertog JK,McLeod DMFraming Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Reese SDGandy OHGrant AE, ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2001:139-162.
29. Hofstede GCulture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. London: Sage; 1980:.
30. Huckfeldt R,Johnson PE,Sprague JPolitical Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions Within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
31. Huckfeldt R,Mendez JM,Osborn TL.Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: the political consequences of heterogeneous networks.Political Psychology. 2004;25 (1): 65-95.
32. Iyengar SIs Anyone Responsible?. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:.
33. Social Movements and Culture. Johnston HKlandermans B, ed. Minneapolis, MN: UCL Press; 1995:.
34. Keele L,Wolak J.Value conflict and volatility in party identification.British Journal of Political Science. 2006;36 (4): 671-690.
35. Kelley HHReadings in Social Psychology. Swanson GENeewcomb TMHartley EL, ed. New York: Holt; 1952:410-414.
36. Lahav GImmigration and Politics in the New Europe: Reinventing Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004a:.
37. Lahav G.Public opinion toward immigration in the European Union: does it matter?.Comparative Political Studies. 2004b;37 (4): 1151-1183.
38. Lavine H.The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45 (4): 915-929.
39. Lazarsfeld PF,Berelson B,Gaudet HThe People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press; 1944:.
40. Levitan LC,Visser PS.Social network composition and attitude strength: exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009;44 (3): 640-649.
41. McGraw KM,Hasecke E,Conger K.Ambivalence, uncertainty, and processes of candidate evaluation.Political Psychology. 2003;24 (3): 421-448.
42. Meffert MF,Guge M,Lodge MStudies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Non-attitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Saris WESniderman PM, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:63-92.
43. Muthén LK,Muthén BOMplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Author; 2006:.
44. Mutz DCHearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
45. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Mutz DCSniderman PMBrody RA, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1996:.
46. Pavlou MImmigrants in Greece. Marvakis AParsanoglou DPavlou M, ed. Athens: Ellinika Grammata; 2001:127-162.
47. Reese SDFraming Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Reese SDGandy OHGrant AE, ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2001:7-32.
48. Reise SP,Widaman KF,Pugh RH.Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.Psychological Bulletin. 1993;114 (3): 552-566.
49. Roggeband C,Vliegenhart R.Divergent framing: the evolution of the public debate on migration and integration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995-2004.West European Politics. 2007;30 (3): 524-548.
50. Rudolph TJ.Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence.Political Psychology. 2005;26 (6): 905-928.
51. Sagiv L,Schwartz SH.Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69:437-448.
52. Scheufele DA,Nisbet MC,Brossard D,Nisbet EC.Social structure and citizenship: examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation.Political Communication. 2004;21 (3): 315-338.
53. Schwartz SHAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology. Zanna M, ed. New York: Academic Press; 1992:1-65.
54. Schwartz SHComparing Cultures: Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective. Vinken HSoeters JEster P, ed. Leiden: Brill; 2004:43-73.
55. Schwartz SH.Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2007;38 (6): 711-728.
56. Semetko HA,Mandelli ACommunication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory. McCombs MShaw DLWeaver D, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997:.
57. Sides J,Citrin J.European opinion about immigration: the role of identities, interests and information.British Journal of Political Science. 2007;37 (4): 477-504.
58. Smith PB,Bond MH,Kagitcibasi CUnderstanding Social Psychology Across Cultures: Living and Working in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006:.
59. Steenbergen MR,Brewer PRStudies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Non-attitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Saris WESniderman PM, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:93-129.
60. Theil S.Europe's big choice.Newsweek. 2010;:.
61. Triandafyllidou A,Veikou M.The hierarchy of Greekness.Ethnicities. 2002;2 (2): 189-208.
62. Van de Vijver FJR,Leung KMethods and Data-analysis for Cross-cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
63. Visser PS,Mirabile RR.Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;87:779-795.
64. Weldon SA.The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: a comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50 (2): 331-349.
65. Zaller JRThe Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
66. Zaller J,Feldman S.A simple theory of survey response; answering questions versus revealing preferences.American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36 (3): 579-616.