Erratum to: Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition (Cognitive Neuropsychology, (2012), 29, 5-6, (360-392), 10.1080/02643294.2012.753433);Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 29, Issue 5-6, 2012, Pages 360-392

  Wilmer, Jeremy B ^a   Germine, Laura ^b   Chabris, Christopher F ^c   Chatterjee, Garga ^d   Gerbasi, Margaret ^b   Nakayama, Ken ^b  

^a WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental prosopagnosia; Face perception; Face recognition; General ability; IQ; Specific ability; Test development; Visual memory; Web testing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROSOPAGNOSIA; PSYCHOMETRY; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROSOPAGNOSIA; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874431553     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2013.780378     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Bowles, D. C., McKone, E., Dawel, A., Duchaine, B., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L., and Yovel, G., 2009. Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26: 423–455. (doi:10.1080/02643290903343149)
2. Brackett, M. A., and Mayer, J. D., 2003. Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 1147–1158. (doi:10.1177/0146167203254596)
3. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W., 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105. (doi:10.1037/h0046016)
4. Chabris, C. F., 2007. “ Cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms of the law of general intelligence ”. In Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition, Edited by: Roberts, M. J., 449–491. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
5. Chatterjee, G., Russell, R., and Nakayama, K., 2009. Non-face visual memory impairments in developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision, 9: 488 (doi:10.1167/9.8.488)
6. Cortina, J. M., 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 98–104. (doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98)
7. Cronbach, L. J., 1957. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12: 671–684. (doi:10.1037/h0043943)
8. Deary, I. J., Lawn, M., & Bartholomew, D. J. (2008). A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The international examinations inquiry meetings 1931–1938. History of Psychology, 11, 122–142.
9. Dennett, H. W., McKone, E., Tavashmi, R., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Edwards, M., and Duchaine, B., 2012. The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behavior Research Methods, 44: 587–605. (doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2)
10. DeVellis, R. F., 1991. Scale development, Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
11. Duchaine, B., and Nakayama, K., 2006. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44: 576–585. (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001)
12. Duchaine, B., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E., and Nakayama, K., 2006. Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23: 714–747. (doi:10.1080/02643290500441296)
13. Edelen, M. O., and Reeve, B. B., 2007. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16: 5–18. (doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0)
14. Embretson, S. E., 1996. The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8: 341–349. (doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341)
15. Embretson, S. E., and Reise, S. P., 2000. Item response theory for psychologists, New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16. Gardner, H., 1983. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York, NY: Basic Books.
17. Germine, L., Cashdollar, N., Düzel, E., and Duchaine, B., 2011. A new selective developmental deficit: Impaired object recognition with normal face recognition. Cortex, 47: 598–607. (doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.009)
18. Germine, L. T., Duchaine, B., and Nakayama, K., 2011. Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition, 118: 201–210. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.002)
19. Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B. C., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., and Wilmer, J. B., 2012. Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19: 847–857. (doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0296-9)
20. Goleman, D., 1998. Working with emotional intelligence, New York, NY: Bantam Books.
21. Guilford, J. P., 1967. The nature of human intelligence, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
22. Hambleton, R. K., and Jones, R. W., 1993. Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (3): 38–47. (doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x)
23. Herzmann, G., Danthiir, V., Schacht, A., Sommer, W., and Wilhelm, O., 2008. Toward a comprehensive test battery for face cognition: Assessment of the tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 840–857. (doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.840)
24. Hildebrandt, A., Sommer, W., Herzmann, G., and Wilhelm, O., 2010. Structural invariance and age-related performance differences in face cognition. Psychology and Aging, 25: 794 (doi:10.1037/a0019774)
25. Hildebrandt, A., Wilhelm, O., Schmiedek, F., Herzmann, G., and Sommer, W., 2011. On the specificity of face cognition compared with general cognitive functioning across adult age. Psychology and Aging, 26: 701 (doi:10.1037/a0023056)
26. Holdnack, J. A., and Delis, D. C., 2004. Parsing the recognition memory components of the WMS–III face memory subtest: Normative data and clinical findings in dementia groups. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26: 459–483. (doi:10.1080/13803390490496687)
27. Howard, M. W., and Kahana, M. J., 2002. When does semantic similarity help episodic retrieval?. Journal of Memory and Language, 46: 85–98. (doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2798)
28. Jensen, A. R., and Weng, L. J., 1994. What is a good g?. Intelligence, 18: 231–258. (doi:10.1016/0160-2896(94)90029-9)
29. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., and Chun, M., 1997. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for the perception of faces. Journal of Neuroscience, 17: 4302–4311.
30. Kim, S., 2006. A comparative study of IRT fixed parameter calibration methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43: 355–381. (doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00021.x)
31. Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R., 1968. Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading, MA: Addison-Welsley Publishing Company.
32. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., and Salovey, P., 1999. Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27: 267–298. (doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00016-1)
33. McGugin, R. W., Richler, J. J., Herzmann, G., Speegle, M., and Gauthier, I., 2012. The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition. Vision Research, 69: 10–22. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.014)
34. McKone, E., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Palermo, R., Wilkinson, R. B., Rivolta, D., and O'Connor, K. B., 2011. Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test–Australian. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28: 109–146. (doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.616880)
35. McKone, E., Kanwisher, N. K., and Duchaine, B. C., 2007. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11: 8–15. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002)
36. McKone, E., Stokes, S., Liu, J., Cohan, S., Fiorentini, C., Pidcock, M., and Pelleg, M., 2012. A robust method for measuring other-race and other-ethnicity effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test format. PLoS ONE, 7 (10): e47956 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047956)
37. Millis, S. R., Malina, A. C., Bowers, D. A., and Ricker, J. H., 1999. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Memory Scale–III. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21: 87–93. (doi:10.1076/jcen.21.1.87.937)
38. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., and Behrmann, M., 1997. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9: 555–604. (doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555)
39. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., 1996. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51: 77–101. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77)
40. Paivio, A., 1965. Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4: 32–38. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80064-0)
41. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., and Madigan, S. A., 1968. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 76 (1, Suppl): 1–25.
42. Pitcher, D., Charles, L., Devlin, J., Walsh, V., and Duchaine, B., 2009. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology, 19: 319–324. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.007)
43. Russell, R., Duchaine, B., and Nakayama, K., 2009. Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16: 252–257. (doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.252)
44. Schmidt, F. L., and Hunter, J. E., 1996. Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1: 199–223. (doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.199)
45. Spearman, C., 1904. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15: 201–292. (doi:10.2307/1412107)
46. Sternberg, R. J., 1984. Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harper's Magazine, 140, 227–235.
48. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., and Sherman, J. W., 2009. The practice of psychological science: Searching for Cronbach's two streams in social-personality psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96: 1206–1225. (doi:10.1037/a0015173)
49. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B., and Livingstone, M. S., 2006. A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311: 670–674. (doi:10.1126/science.1119983)
50. Tsao, D. Y., Moeller, S., and Freiwald, W. A., 2008. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105: 19514–19519. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0809662105)
51. Wechsler, D., 1997. Wechsler Memory Scale, 3, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
52. Wechsler, D., 2009. Wechsler Memory Scale, 4, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
53. Wilhelm, O., Herzmann, G., Kunina, O., Danthiir, V., Schacht, A., and Sommer, W., 2010. Individual differences in perceiving and recognizing faces—one element of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 530 (doi:10.1037/a0019972)
54. Wilmer, J. B., 2008. How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis. Spatial Vision, 21: 561–579. (doi:10.1163/156856808786451408)
55. Wilmer, J. B., Germine, L., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., Williams, M., Loken, E., and Duchaine, B., 2010. Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107: 5238–5241. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0913053107)
56. Woolley, A. W., Gerbasi, M. E., Chabris, C. F., Kosslyn, S. M., and Hackman, J. R., 2008. Bringing in the experts: How team ability composition and collaborative planning jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39: 352–371. (doi:10.1177/1046496408317792)
57. Yen, W. M., 1987. A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of BILOG and LOGIST. Psychometrika, 52: 275–291. (doi:10.1007/BF02294241)