The new rules of measurement

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 341-349

  Embretson, Susan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MENTAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; SHORT SURVEY; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030499290     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., Sechrest, L., & Reno, R. R. (1990). Graduate training in statistics, methodology and measurement in psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 721-734.
2. Andrich, D. (1982). An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR 20 index and the Guttman scale response pattern. Educational Research and Perspectives, 9, 95-104.
3. Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Angoff, W. (1982). Summary and derivation of equating methods used at ETS. In P. Holland & D. Rubin (Eds.), Test equating. New York: Academic Press (pp. 55-79).
5. Davison, M., & Sharma, A. R. (1990). Parametric statistics and levels of measurement: Factorial designs and multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 394-400.
6. Department of Defense. (1996). Computerized adaptive test (CAT) for the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Test. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Embretson, S. E. (1984). A general multicomponent latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika, 49, 175-186.
8. Embretson, S. E. (1991). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495-516.
9. Embretson, S. E. (1995, August). The new rules of measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
10. Embretson, S. E. (in press-a). Measurement principles for the new generation of tests: A quiet revolution. In R. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook on testing Westport, CT: Greenwood.
11. Embretson, S. E. (in press-b). Multicomponent latent trait models. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Embretson, S. E., & DeBoeck, R (1994). Latent trait theory. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence (pp. 4021-4017), New York: Macmillan.
13. Fischer, G. (1995). Derivations of the Rasch model. In I. G. Fischer & I. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
16. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Holland, P., & Rubin, D. (1982). Test equaling. New York: Academic Press.
18. Jones, L. V. (1971). The nature of measurement. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 485-498). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
19. Kelderman, H., & Rijkes, C. P. M. (1994). Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items. Psychometrika, 59, 149-176.
20. Lord, F. (1952). A theory of test scores, Psychometric Monographs (whole No. 1).
21. Lord, F., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests. New York: Addison-Wesley.
22. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
23. Michel, J. (1990). An introducton to the logic of psychological measurement Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Peterson, N., Marco, G., & Steward, E. (1982). A test of the adequacy of linear score equating models. In P. Holland & D. Rubin (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 71-135). New York: Academic Press.
25. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Educational Research. (Expanded ed., 1980. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)
26. Roskam, E., & Jansen, P. G. W. (1984). A new derivation of the Rasch model. M. E. Degreef & J. von Buggenhaut (Eds.), Trends in mathematical psychology (pp. 293-307). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
27. Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 271-282.
28. Spearman, C. (1907). Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-292.
29. Spearman, C. (1913). Correlation of sums and differences. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 417-426.
30. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical manual: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.