When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: Corepresentation of robotic actions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1073-1077

  Stenzel, Anna ^a   Chinellato, Eris ^b   Bou, Maria A Tirado ^c   Del Pobil, Ángel P ^c   Lappe, Markus ^a   Liepelt, Roman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Joint action; Social Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874418414     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029493     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 371-385. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9
2. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action corepresentation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3, 410- 420. doi:10.1080/17470910801900908
3. Chinellato, E., Antonelli, M., Grzyb, B. J., & del Pobil, A. P. (2011). Implicit sensorimotor mapping of the peripersonal space by gazing and reaching. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 3, 43-53. doi:10.1109/TAMD.2011.2106781
4. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How "social" is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 84. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084
5. Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348-355. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009 .10.008
6. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794-798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02367.x
7. Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y., & Ishiguro, H. (2008). Analysis of humanoid appearances in human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 725-735. doi:10.1109/TRO.2008.921566
8. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522-525. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
9. Lam, M. Y., & Chua, R. (2010). Influence of stimulus-response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect. Psychological Research, 74, 476-480. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0269-4
10. Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-Down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57, 221-227. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028
11. Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578-591. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578
12. Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., Fischer, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task. Psychological Research, 75, 366-375. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3
13. MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7, 297-337. doi:10.1075/is.7.3.03mac
14. Müller, B. C. N., Brass, M., Kühn, S., Tsai, C.-C., Nieuwboer, W., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. (2011). When Pinocchio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1373-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.022
15. Müller, B. C. N., Kühn, S., van Baaren, R. B., Dotsch, R., Brass, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members' actions. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 423-428. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2654-7
16. Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N. C., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2006). Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia, 44, 718-730. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017
17. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
18. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21. doi:10.1016/S0010- 0277(03)00043-X
19. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234
20. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 859-870. doi:10.1162/jocn .2006.18.5.859
21. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304. doi:10.1037/h0020586
22. Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 915-926. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
23. Tsai, C.-C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Psychological Science, 18, 1058-1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02025.x
24. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action corepresentation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2015-2024. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20144
25. Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 147-172. doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0057-0