A joint discrete-continuous model considering budget constraint for the continuous part: Application in joint mode and departure time choice modelling

Transportmetrica A: Transport Science

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 149-177

  Habib, Khandker M Nurul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

departure time; discrete continuous model; mode choice; random utility maximisation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVELS; DEPARTURE TIME; DEPARTURE TIME CHOICE; ECONOMETRIC MODELLING; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; LAND USE MODELLING; MODE CHOICE; RANDOM UTILITY MAXIMISATION;

BUDGET CONTROL;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84874406385     PISSN: 23249935     EISSN: 23249943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18128602.2010.551525     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahn, J., Jeong, G. and Kim, Y. 2008. A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: a multiple discrete-continuous choice approach. Energy Economics, 30: 2091-2104. (doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.003)
2. Aptech Systems. 2009. GAUSS user's manual, CA: Maple Valley.
3. Arora, N., Allenby, G. M. and Ginter, J. L. 1998. A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Science, 17: 29-44. (doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.29)
4. Bajwa, S. 2008. Discrete choice modeling of combined mode and departure time. Transportmetrica, 4(2): 155-177. (doi:10.1080/18128600808685681)
5. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
6. Bhat, C. R. 1998a. A model of post-home arrival activity participation behaviour. Transportation Research Part B, 32(6): 387-400. (doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00006-X)
7. Bhat, C. R. 1998b. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research Part B, 32(6): 361-371. (doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00004-6)
8. Bhat, C. R. 2001. Modeling the commute activity-travel pattern of workers: formulation and empirical analysis. Transportation Science, 35(1): 61-79. (doi:10.1287/trsc.35.1.61.10142)
9. Bhat, C. R. 2005. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transportation Research Part B, 39(8): 679-707. (doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.08.003)
10. Bhat, C. R. 2008. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transportation Research Part B, 42: 274-303. (doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007.06.002)
11. Bhat, C. R., Srinivasan, S. and Sen, S. 2006. A joint model for the perfact and imperfact substitute goods case: application to activity time-use decisions. Transportation Research Part B, 40: 827-850. (doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.08.004)
12. Chiang, J. 1991. A simultaneous approach to whether, what and how much to buy questions. Marketing Science, 4: 297-315. (doi:10.1287/mksc.10.4.297)
13. Chintagunta, P. K. 1993. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Science, 12: 194-208. (doi:10.1287/mksc.12.2.184)
14. Data Management Group (DMG), 2009. Transportation tomorrow survey. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto. Available from: http://www.jpint.utoronto.ca/dmg/tts.html [Accessed in January 2010]
15. Day, N., Habib, K.M.N., and Miller, E.J., 2008. Analysis of work trip timing and mode choice. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37, 695-703
16. De Jong, G. 2003. A model for time of day and mode choice using error component logit. Transportation Research Part E, 39: 245-268. (doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00037-6)
17. Dubin, J. and McFadden, D. 1984. An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52: 345-362. (doi:10.2307/1911493)
18. Fang, H. A. 2008. A discrete-continuous model of households' vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density. Transportation Research Part B, 42: 736-758. (doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.01.004)
19. Habib, K.M.N., 2007. Modeling activity generation processes. Thesis (PhD), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto
20. Habib, KMN. 2009. Joint model of commuting mode choice, work start time and duration. Working Paper. 2009. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
21. Habib, KMN, Carrasco, J. A. and Miller, E. J. 2008. Social context of activity scheduling: discrete-continuous model of relationship between 'with whom' and episode start time and duration. Transportation Research Record, 2076: 81-87. (doi:10.3141/2076-09)
22. Habib, KMN, Day, N. and Miller, E. J. 2009. An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transportation Research Part A, 43: 639-653.
23. Habib, KMN and Miller, E. J. 2009. Modeling activity generation: a utility based-model for activity agenda formation. Transportmetrica, 5(1): 3-23. (doi:10.1080/18128600802591384)
24. Hanemann, W. M. 1984. Discrete/continuous model of consumer demand. Econometrica, 52: 541-561. (doi:10.2307/1913464)
25. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47: 153-161. (doi:10.2307/1912352)
26. Hess, S. 2007. On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modeling forecasting system. Transportation Research Part A, 41: 802-826.
27. th international conference on travel behaviour research. 2003, Lucerne, August.
28. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. and Balakrisnan, N. 1995. Continuous univariate distributions, Vol. 2, Hoboken, NJ: Willey Inter. Science.
29. Kim, J., Allenby, G. M. and Rossi, P. E. 2002. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Science, 21: 229-250. (doi:10.1287/mksc.21.3.229.143)
30. Kim, J., Allenby, G. M. and Rossi, P. E. 2007. Product attributes and model of multiple discreteness. Journal of Econometrics, 138: 208-230. (doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.020)
31. Kottegoda, N. T. and Rosso, R. 2008. Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers, 2, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
32. Kuhn, H. W. and Tucker, A. W. 1951. "Nonlinear programming". In Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Edited by: Neyman, J. 481-492. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Lee, L-F. 1983. Generalized econometric models of selectivity. Econometrica, 51: 507-512. (doi:10.2307/1912003)
34. McFadden, D., 2000. Economic Choice. Noble Prize Lecture, December 8, 2000
35. Miller, E. J. 2007. A Travel demand modeling system for the greater toronto area, version 3.0: Volume II GTA MODEL version 3.0 model system documentation, Toronto: Urban Transportation Research and Advancement Centre (UTRAC), University of Toronto.
36. Miller, E. J., Roorda, M. J. and Carrasco, J. A. 2005. A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation, 32: 399-422. (doi:10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3)
37. Munizaga, M. 2007. Valuing time with a joint mode choice-activity model. International Journal of Transport Economics, XXXIII(2): 193-210.
38. Munizaga, M. 2008. Econometric calibration of joint time assignment-mode choice model. Transportation Science, 42(2): 208-219. (doi:10.1287/trsc.1080.0231)
39. Nick, D., Habib, KMN and Miller, E. J. 2010. Analysis of work trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37: 695-705. (doi:10.1139/L10-008)
40. Pendyala, R. and Bhat, C. R. 2004. An exploration of the relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activities. Transportation, 31: 429-456. (doi:10.1023/B:PORT.0000037060.42921.35)
41. Pinjary, A.R., Bhat, C.R., and Hensher, D.A., 2009. Residential self selection effects in an activity time-use behaviour model. Transportation Research Part B, 43 (7), 729-748.
42. Pollak, R. and Wales, T. 1992. Demand System specification and estimation, New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Roorda, M. J., Miller, E. J. and Habib, KMN. 2008. Validation of TASHA: a 24-hr travel activity microsimulation model. Transportation Research Part A, 42: 360-375.
44. Russo, F., Vitetta, A. and Comi, A. 2009. Estimation of target time distribution for agri food products by road transportation. Operations Research/Computer Science Interface Series, 46: 1-17. (doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84812-9_14)
45. Small, K. A. 1987. A discrete model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica, 55(2): 409-424. (doi:10.2307/1913243)
46. Train, K. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation, New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Train, K. and McFadden, D. 1978. The goods/leisure tradeoff and disaggregate work trip mode choice models. Transportation Research, 12(5): 349-353. (doi:10.1016/0041-1647(78)90011-4)
48. Transport Canada. 2006. The cost of urban congestion in Canada, Ottawa, Canada: Transport Canada Environmental Affairs.
49. Tringides, C. A. and Pendyala, R. 2004. Departure time choice and mode choice for non-work trips: alternative formulations for joint model system. Transportation Research Record, 1898: 1-9. (doi:10.3141/1898-01)
50. Vickery, W. S. 1969. Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review, 59: 251-260.
51. Vrtic, M., et al., 2007. Route, mode and departure time choice behaviour in presence of mobility pricing. In: Paper presented at the 86th annual meeting of transportation research board, Washington, DC
52. Wen, C-H. 2010. Alternative tree structures for estimating nested logit models with mixed preference data. Transportmetrica, 6(4): 291-309. (doi:10.1080/18128600903401236)
53. Ye, X. and Pendyala, R. 2009. A probit based joint discrete-continuous model system: analysing the relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activities. In: Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of transportation research board. 2009, Washington, DC.