Management of natural rubber glove sensitivity

Protective Gloves for Occupational Use, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 155-186

  Hamann, Curtis P ^a   Rodgers, Pamela A ^a   Sullivan, Kim M ^a  

^a SmartPractice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874383191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (156)

1. Hosler, D., Burkett, S.L., and Tarkanian, M.J., Prehistoric polymers: rubber processing in ancient Mesoamerica, Science, 284, 1988, 1999.
2. Ownby, D.R., A history of latex allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S27, 2002.
3. Downing, J.G., Dermatitis from rubber gloves, N. Engl. J. Med., 208, 196, 1933.
4. Nutter, A.F., Contact urticaria to rubber, Br. J. Dermatol., 101, 597, 1979.
5. Verrusio, A.C. et al., The dentists and infectious diseases: a national survey of attitudes and behavior, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 118, 553, 1989.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry, MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 35, 237, 1986.
7. Axelsson, J.G.K., Johansson, S.G.O., and Wrangsjö, K., IgE-mediated anaphylactoid reactions to rubber, Allergy, 42, 46, 1987.
8. Turjanmaa, K. et al., Severe IgE-mediated allergy to surgical gloves [abstract], Allergy, 39(Suppl. 2), 1984.
9. Estlander, T., Jolanki, R., and Kanerva, L., Dermatitis and urticaria from rubber and plastic gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 14, 20, 1986.
10. Turjanmaa, K. and Mäkinen-Kiljunen, S., Latex allergy: prevalence, risk factors, and cross-reactivity, Methods, 27, 10, 2002.
11. Garabrant, D.H. and Schweitzer, S., Epidemiology of latex sensitization and allergies in health care workers, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S82, 2002.
12. Liss, G.M. et al., Latex allergy: epidemiological study of 1351 hospital workers, Occup. Environ. Med., 54, 335, 1997.
13. Hamann, C.P. et al., Natural rubber latex hypersensitivity: incidence and prevalence of type 1 allergy in the dental professional, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 129, 43, 1998.
14. Palczynski, C. et al., Latex allergy in Polish nurses, Am. J. Ind. Med, 35, 413, 1999.
15. Leung, R. et al., Prevalence of latex allergy in hospital staff in Hong Kong, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 27, 167, 1997.
16. Tarlo, S.M. et al., Outcomes of a natural rubber latex control program in an Ontario teaching hospital, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 108, 628, 2001.
17. Saary, M.J. et al., Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 109, 131, 2002.
18. Turjanmaa, K. et al., Long-term outcome of 160 adult patients with natural rubber latex allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S70, 2002.
19. Allmers, H., Schmengler, J., and Skudlik, C., Primary prevention of natural rubber latex allergy in the German health care system through education and intervention, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, 318, 2002.
20. Hunt, L.W. et al., Management of occupational allergy to natural rubber latex in a medical center: the importance of quantitative latex allergen measurement and objective follow-up, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S96, 2002.
21. Conde-Salazar, L. et al., Latex allergy among construction workers, Contact Dermatitis, 47, 154, 2002.
22. Nettis, E. et al., Latex hypersensitivity: relationship with positive prick test and patch test responses among hairdressers, Allergy, 58, 57, 2003.
23. Sussman, G.L. et al., Latex allergy in housekeeping personnel, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 74, 415, 1995.
24. Gautrin, D. et al., Specific IgE-dependent sensitization, atopy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in apprentices starting exposure to protein-derived agents, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 155, 1841, 1997.
25. Blanco, C. et al., Latex allergy: clinical features and cross-reactivity with fruits, Ann. Allergy, 73, 309, 1994.
26. Nettis, E. et al., Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 32, 441, 2002.
27. Kucenic, M.J. and Belsito, D.V., Occupational allergic contact dermatitis is more prevalent than irritant contact dermatitis: a 5-year study, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 46, 695, 2002.
28. Wrangsjö, K., Swartling, C., and Meding, B., Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: contact dermatitis with special reference to (meth)acrylates in 174 patients, Contact Dermatitis, 45, 158, 2001.
29. Wallenhammar, L.M. et al., Contact allergy and hand eczema in Swedish dentists, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 192, 2000.
30. Schnuch, A. et al., Contact allergies in health-care workers. Results from the IVDK, Acta Derm. Venereol., 78, 358, 1998.
31. Gibbon, K.L. et al., Changing frequency of thiuram allergy in health-care workers with hand dermatitis, Br. J. Dermatol., 144, 347, 2001.
32. Nettis, E. et al., Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and Type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in children with risk factors, Contact Dermatitis, 44, 181, 2001.
33. Nethercott, J.R. and Holness, D.L., Occupational dermatitis in food handlers and bakers, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 21, 485, 1989.
34. Bauer, A., Geier, J., and Elsner, P., Type IV allergy in the food processing industry:sensitization profiles in bakers, cooks and butchers, Contact Dermatitis, 46, 228, 2002.
35. Conde-Salazar, L. et al., Type IV allergy to rubber additives: a 10-year study of 686 cases, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 29, 176, 1993.
36. Conde-Salazar, L. et al., Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers (1980-1993), Am. J. Contact Dermatol., 6, 19, 1995.
37. Conde-Salazar, L. et al., Type IV allergy to rubber additives: a 10-year study of 686 cases, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 29, 176, 1993.
38. Suphioglu, C., Rolland, J.M., and O’Hehir, R.E., Latex allergy: towards immunotherapy for health care workers, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 32, 667, 2002.
39. Holness, D.L. and Mace, S.R., Results of evaluating health care workers with prick and patch testing, Am. J. Contact Dermatol., 12, 88, 2001.
40. Hamilton, R.G., Peterson, E.L., and Ownby, D.R., Clinical and laboratory-based methods in the diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S47, 2002.
41. Yip, E. and Cacioli, P., The manufacture of gloves from natural rubber latex, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S3, 2002.
42. Guin, J.D., Hamann, C., and Sullivan, K., Natural and synthetic rubber, in Occupational Skin Disease, Adams, R.M., Ed., W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1999, chap. 29.
43. Truscott, W., Glove powder reduction and alternative approaches, Methods, 27, 69, 2002.
44. Hamann, C.P. and Kick, S.A., Allergies associated with medical gloves: manufacturing issues, Dermatol. Clin., 12, 547, 1994.
45. Sussman, G.L., Beezhold, D.H., and Kurup, V.P., Allergens and natural rubber proteins, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S33-S39, 2002.
46. Allmers, H. et al., Reduction of latex aeroallergens and latex-specific IgE antibodies in sensitized workers after removal of powdered natural rubber latex gloves in a hospital, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 102, 841, 1998.
47. Kim, K.T., Safadi, G.S., and Sheikh, K.M., Diagnostic evaluation of type I latex allergy, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 80, 66, 1998.
48. Yeang, H.Y. et al., Natural rubber latex allergens: new developments, Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 4, 99, 2004.
49. Bernstein, D.I. et al., In vivo sensitization to purified Hevea brasiliensis proteins in health care workers sensitized to natural rubber latex, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 111, 610, 2003.
50. Palosuo, T., Alenius, H., and Turjanmaa, K., Quantitation of latex allergens, Methods, 27, 52, 2002.
51. Charous, B.L., Schuenemann, P.J., and Swanson, M.C., Passive dispersion of latex aeroallergen in a health-care facility, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 85, 285, 2000.
52. Swanson, M.C. et al., Quantification of occupational latex aeroallergens in a medical center, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 94, 445, 1994.
53. Sussman, G.L. et al., Incidence of latex sensitization among latex glove users [see comments], J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 101, 171, 1998.
54. Baur, X., Measurement of airborne latex allergens, Methods, 27, 59, 2002.
55. Baur, X., Chen, Z., and Allmers, H., Can a threshold limit value for natural rubber latex airborne allergens be defined?, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 101, 24, 1998.
56. Barbara, J. et al., Immunoadjuvant properties of glove cornstarch powder in latexinduced hypersensitivity, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 33, 106, 2003.
57. Williams, P.B. and Halsey, J.F., Endotoxin as a factor in adverse reactions to latex gloves, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 79, 303, 1997.
58. FDA, Medical Glove Guidance Manual: Draft Document, FDA CDRH, 1999, pp. 1-12-2.
59. Lundberg, M., Wrangsjö, K., and Johansson, S.G.O., Latex allergy from glove powder-an unintended risk with the switch from talc to cornstarch? Allergy, 52, 1222, 1997.
60. Swanson, M.C. and Ramalingam, M., Starch and natural rubber allergen interaction in the production of latex gloves: a hand-held aerosol, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S15, 2002.
61. Shearer, W.T. and Huston, D.T., The immune system: an overview, in Allergy: Principles and Practice, Vol. 1, 4th ed., Middleton, E. et al., Eds., Mosby, St. Louis, 1993, chap. 1.
62. Fisher, A.A., Rietschel, R.L., and Fowler, J.F., Jr., Allergy to rubber, in Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis, Rietschel, R.L. and Fowler, J.F., Jr., Eds., Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000, chap. 31.
63. Knudsen, B.B. et al., Release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 28, 63, 1993.
64. Knudsen, B.B. et al., Allergologically relevant rubber accelerators in single-use medical gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 9, 2000.
65. Brehler, R., Rutter, A., and Kutting, B., Allergenicity of natural rubber latex gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 46, 65, 2002.
66. Bergendorff, O. and Hansson, C., Spontaneous formation of thiuram disulfides in solutions of iron(III) dithiocarbamates, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 1092, 2002.
67. Knudsen, B.B. and Menné, T., Contact allergy and exposure patterns to thiurams and carbamates in consecutive patients, Contact Dermatitis, 35, 97, 1996.
68. Rietschel, R.L. et al., Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 13, 170, 2002.
69. Kerosuo, E., Kerosuo, H., and Kanerva, L., Self-reported health complaints among general dental practitioners, orthodontists, and office employees, Acta Odontol. Scand., 58, 207, 2000.
70. Wrangsjö, K. et al., Protective gloves in Swedish dentistry: use and side-effects, Br. J. Dermatol., 145, 32, 2001.
71. Bollinger, M.E. et al., A hospital-based screening program for natural rubber latex allergy, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 88, 560, 2002.
72. Charous, B.L. et al., Natural rubber latex allergy in the occupational setting, Methods, 27, 15, 2002.
73. Sussman, G.L., Beezhold, D.H., and Liss, G., Latex allergy: historical perspective, Methods, 27, 3, 2002.
74. Hochleitner, B.W. et al., Spina bifida as an independent risk factor for sensitization to latex, J. Urol., 166, 2370, 2001.
75. Buck, D. et al., Ventricular shunts and the prevalence of sensitization and clinically relevant allergy to latex in patients with spina bifida, Pediatr. Allergy Immunol., 11, 111, 2000.
76. Degenhardt, P. et al., Latex allergy in pediatric surgery is dependent on repeated operations in the first year of life, J. Pediatr. Surg., 36, 1535, 2001.
77. Rueff, F. et al., Frequency of natural rubber latex allergy in adults is increased after multiple operative procedures, Allergy, 56, 889, 2001.
78. Holter, G. et al., Self-reported skin and respiratory symptoms related to latex exposure among 5,087 hospital employees in Norway, Dermatology, 205, 28, 2002.
79. Hayes, B.B. et al., Evaluation of percutaneous penetration of natural rubber latex proteins, Toxicol. Sci., 56, 262, 2000.
80. Wagner, S. and Breiteneder, H., The latex-fruit syndrome, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 30, 935, 2001.
81. Sicherer, S.H., Clinical implications of cross-reactive food allergens, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 108, 881, 2001.
82. Diaz-Perales, A. et al., Cross-reactions in the latex-fruit syndrome: a relevant role of chitinases but not of complex asparagine-linked glycans, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 104, 681, 1999.
83. Fuchs, T., Natural latex, grass pollen, and weed pollen share IgE epitopes, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 100, 356, 1997.
84. De Greef, J.M. et al., Urticaria and rhinitis to shrubs of Ficus benjamina and breadfruit in a banana-allergic road worker: evidence for a cross-sensitization between Moracea, banana and latex, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 125, 182, 2001.
85. Levy, D.A. et al., Allergic sensitization and clinical reactions to latex, food and pollen in adult patients, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 30, 270, 2000.
86. Beezhold, D.H. et al., Latex allergy can induce clinical reactions to specific foods, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 26, 416, 1996.
87. Ballantyne, B. and Jordan, S.L., Toxicological, medical and industrial hygiene aspects of glutaraldehyde with particular reference to its biocidal use in cold sterilization procedures, J. Appl. Toxicol., 21, 131, 2001.
88. Vyas, A. et al., Survey of symptoms, respiratory function, and immunology and their relation to glutaraldehyde and other occupational exposures among endoscopy nursing staff, Occup. Environ. Med., 57, 752, 2000.
89. Piirilä, P. et al., Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity in dental personnel, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 75, 209, 2002.
90. Fleming, C.J., Burden, A.D., and Forsyth, A., Accuracy of questions related to allergic contact dermatitis, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 11, 218, 2000.
91. Katelaris, C.H. et al., Screening for latex allergy with a questionnaire: comparison with latex skin testing in a group of dental professionals, Aust. Dent. J., 47, 152, 2002.
92. Adisesh, A., Meyer, J.D., and Cherry, N.M., Prognosis and work absence due to occupational contact dermatitis, Contact Dermatitis, 46, 273, 2002.
93. Hamilton, R.G., Diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy, Methods, 27, 22, 2002.
94. Carrillo, T. et al., Contact urticaria and rhinitis from latex surgical gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 15, 69, 1986.
95. Sanz, M.L. et al., Flow-cytometric cellular allergen stimulation test in latex allergy, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 130, 33, 2003.
96. Yip, L. et al., Skin prick test reactivity to recombinant latex allergens, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 121, 292, 2000.
97. Yeang, H.Y., Prevalence of latex allergy may be vastly overestimated when determined by in vitro assays, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 84, 628, 2000.
98. Turjanmaa, K. et al., Latex allergy diagnosis: in vivo and in vitro standardization of a natural rubber latex extract, Allergy, 52, 41, 1997.
99. Hamilton, R.G. and Adkinson, N.F., Jr., Diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy:multicenter latex skin testing efficacy study. Multicenter Latex Skin Testing Study Task Force, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 102, 482, 1998.
100. Ebo, D.G. et al., Latex-specific IgE, skin testing, and lymphocyte transformation to latex in latex allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 100, 618, 1997.
101. Blanco, C. et al., Comparison of skin-prick test and specific serum IgE determination for the diagnosis of latex allergy, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 28, 971, 1998.
102. Gruber, C. et al., Is there a role for immunoblots in the diagnosis of latex allergy? Intermethod comparison of in vitro and in vivo IgE assays in spina bifida patients, Allergy, 55, 476, 2000.
103. Shojaei, A.R. and Haas, D.A., Local anesthetic cartridges and latex allergy: a literature review, J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 68, 622, 2002.
104. Farrell, A.L. et al., Prevalence and methodology of evaluation for latex allergy among allergists in the United States: results of a cross-sectional survey, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 13, 183, 2002.
105. Warshaw, E.M. and Nelson, D., Prevalence of evaluation for latex allergy and association with practice characteristics in United States dermatologists: results of a crosssectional survey, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 12, 139, 2001.
106. Ownby, D.R., Magera, B., and Williams, P.B., A blinded, multi-center evaluation of two commercial in vitro tests for latex-specific IgE antibodies, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 84, 193, 2000.
107. Hamilton, R.G., Biagini, R.E., and Krieg, E.F., Diagnostic performance of Food and Drug Administration-cleared serologic assays for natural rubber latex-specific IgE antibody, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 103, 925, 1999.
108. Kutting, B., Weber, B., and Brehler, R., Evaluation of a dipstick test (Allergodip-Latex) for in vitro diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 126, 226, 2001.
109. Storrs, F.J. et al., Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America-1984 to 1985, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 20, 1038, 1989.
110. Fischer, T. and Adams, R.M., Diagnostic patch testing, in Occupational Skin Disease, Adams, R.M., Ed., W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1999, 14.
111. Jonker, M.J. and Bruynzeel, D.P., The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7, Contact Dermatitis, 42, 330, 2000.
112. Geier, J. et al., Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6, Contact Dermatitis, 40, 119, 1999.
113. Uter, W.J., Geier, J., and Schnuch, A., Good clinical practice in patch testing: readings beyond day 2 are necessary: a confirmatory analysis., Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 7, 231, 1996.
114. Marks, J.G. et al., North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 38, 911, 1998.
115. Marks, J.G., Jr. et al., North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998, Arch. Dermatol., 136, 272, 2000.
116. Elston, D. et al., Pitfalls in patch testing, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 11, 184, 2000.
117. Nethercott, J.R., Sensitivity and specificity of patch tests, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 5, 136, 1994.
118. Sherertz, E.F. et al., Patch testing discordance alert: false-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 45, 313, 2001.
119. Vozmediano, J.M.F. and Hita, J.C.A., Concordance and discordance between TRUE Test and Finn Chamber, Contact Dermatitis, 42, 182, 2000.
120. Brasch, J. et al., Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 12, 197, 2001.
121. Geier, J. et al., Diagnostic screening for contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole derivatives, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 13, 66, 2002.
122. Diepgen, T.L. and Coenraads, P.J., Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of patch testing: the more you test, the more you get? Contact Dermatitis, 42, 315, 2000.
123. Crippa, M. and Pasolini, G., Allergic reactions due to glove-lubricant-powder in health-care workers, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 70, 399, 1997.
124. Sommer, S. et al., Type IV hypersensitivity reactions to natural rubber latex: results of a multicentre study, Br. J. Dermatol., 146, 114, 2002.
125. Hamann, C.P., Rodgers, P.A., and Sullivan, K., Allergic contact dermatitis in dental professionals: effective diagnosis and treatment, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 134, 185, 2003.
126. Schnuch, A. et al., Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study, Br. J. Dermatol., 138, 467, 1998.
127. Larson, E., Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on the hands of nurses, Heart Lung, 26, 404, 1997.
128. Shaffer, M.P. and Belsito, D.V., Allergic contact dermatitis from glutaraldehyde in health-care workers, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 150, 2000.
129. Connor, T.H., Permeability of nitrile rubber, latex, polyurethane, and neoprene gloves to 18 antineoplastic drugs, Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., 56, 2450, 1999.
130. West, D.P. and Zhu, Y.F., Evaluation of aloe vera gel gloves in the treatment of dry skin associated with occupational exposure, Am. J. Infect. Control, 31, 40, 2003.
131. Brehler, R., Voss, W., and Muller, S., Glove powder affects skin roughness, one parameter of skin irritation, Contact Dermatitis, 39, 227, 1998.
132. Pavlovich, L.J. et al., Ease of donning surgical gloves: an important consideration in glove selection, J. Emerg. Med., 13, 353, 1995.
133. Carrozzi, F.M. et al., Minimizing the risks of latex allergy: the effectiveness of written information, Aust. Dent. J., 47, 237, 2002.
134. Trape, M., Schenck, P., and Warren, A., Latex gloves use and symptoms in health care workers 1 year after implementation of a policy restricting the use of powdered gloves, Am. J. Infect. Control, 28, 352, 2000.
135. Paul, M.A., Fleischer, A.B., and Sherertz, E.F., Patient’s benefit from contact dermatitis evaluation: results of a follow-up study, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 6, 63, 1995.
136. Edman, B., The usefulness of detailed information to patients with contact allergy, Contact Dermatitis, 19, 43, 1988.
137. Food and Drug Administration, Natural Rubber-Containing Medical Devices; User Labeling [21 CFR Part 801], Fed. Regis., 62, No. 189(September 30), 51021, 1997.
138. American Society for Testing and Materials, D 5712-99 Standard Test Method for the Analysis of Aqueous Extractable Protein in Natural Rubber and Its Products Using the Modified Lowry Method, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1999.
139. Chen, S.F., Teoh, S.C., and Porter, M., A false-positive result with the American Society for Testing and Materials D 5712-95 test method for protein given by a common vulcanization accelerator, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 100, 713, 1997.
140. Beezhold, D.H., Kostyal, D.A., and Tomazic-Jezic, V.J., Measurement of latex proteins and assessment of latex protein exposure, Methods, 27, 46, 2002.
141. Palosuo, T. et al., Measurement of natural rubber latex allergen levels in medical gloves by allergen-specific IgE-ELISA inhibition, RAST inhibition, and skin prick test, Allergy, 53, 59, 1999.
142. Farnham, J.J., Tomazic-Jezic, V.J., and Stratmeyer, M.E., Regulatory initiatives for natural latex allergy: U.S. perspectives, Methods, 27, 87, 2002.
143. e2, Standard Specification for Rubber Examination Gloves, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, 2001.
144. e2, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, 2001.
145. Kujala, V. et al., Extractable latex allergens in airborne glove powder and in cut glove pieces, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 32, 1077, 2002.
146. Sugiura, K. et al., Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP) in the dotted polyvinyl-chloride grip of cotton gloves as a cause of contact urticaria syndrome, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 237, 2000.
147. Walker, S.L. et al., Occupational contact dermatitis from headphones containing diethylhexyl phthalate, Contact Dermatitis, 42, 164, 2000.
148. Lee, H.N. et al., Cross-reactivity among epoxy acrylates and bisphenol F epoxy resins in patients with bisphenol A epoxy resin sensitivity, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 13, 108, 2002.
149. Sugiura, K. et al., Contact urticaria due to polyethylene gloves, Contact Dermatitis, 46, 262, 2002.
150. Sugiura, K. et al., A case of contact urticaria syndrome due to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP) in work clothes, Contact Dermatitis, 46, 13, 2002.
151. Reiter, J.E., Latex sensitivity: an industrial hygiene perspective, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S121, 2002.
152. Mitakakis, T.Z. et al., Particulate masks and non-powdered gloves reduce latex allergen inhaled by health-care workers, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 32, 1166, 2002.
153. Tomazic-Jezic, V.J. and Lucas, A.D., Protein and allergen assays for natural rubber latex products, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110, S40, 2002.
154. Yeang, H.Y. et al., Appraisal of latex glove proteins in the induction of sensitivity to multiple latex allergens, J. Inv. Allergol. Clin. Immunol., 10, 215, 2000.
155. Banerjee, B. et al., IgE from latex-allergic patients binds to cloned and expressed B cell epitopes of prohevein, J. Immunol., 159, 5724, 1997.
156. Wagner, S. et al., Identification of a Hevea brasiliensis latex manganese superoxide dismutase (Hev b 10) as a cross-reactive allergen, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 125, 120, 2001.