Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Mammography amongst Low Income Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Gardner, Michael P ^a   Adams, Abbey ^a   Jeffreys, Mona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAMMOGRAPHY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; POVERTY;

EID: 84874338778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055574     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF, (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24: 2137-50.
2. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW, (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293: 1245-56.
3. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M, (2011) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD001877.
4. Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Marchesi F, et al. (2009) EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer 45: 931-91.
5. Sant M, Allemani C, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Aareleid T, et al. (2003) Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe. Int J Cancer 106: 416-22.
6. Gotzsche PC, Jorgensen KJ, Zahl PH, Maehlen J, (2012) Why mammography screening has not lived up to expectations from the randomised trials. Cancer Causes Control 23: 15-21.
7. McKenzie F, Ives A, Jeffreys M, (2012) Socio-economic inequalities in survival from screen-detected breast cancer in South West England: population-based cohort study. Eur J Public Health 22: 418-22.
8. The Information Centre. Breast Screening Programme. Available: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/008_Screening/brstscreen1011/brst_scr_prog_eng_2010_11_rep.pdf. Accessed 2012 January 8.
9. Botha JL, Manku-Scott TK, Moledina F, Williams A, (1993) Indirect discrimination and breast screening. Ethn Dis 3: 189-95.
10. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC, (2003) Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 97: 1528-40.
11. Reuben DB, Bassett LW, Hirsch SH, Jackson CA, Bastani R, (2002) A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women. Am J Roentgenol 179: 1509-14.
12. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP, (2000) Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist. Am J Public Health 90: 799-803.
13. Sin JP, St Leger AS, (1999) Interventions to increase breast screening uptake: do they make any difference? J Med Screen 6: 170-81.
14. Lyratzopoulos G, Barbiere JM, Rachet B, Baum M, Thompson MR, et al. (2011) Changes over time in socioeconomic inequalities in breast and rectal cancer survival in England and Wales during a 32-year period (1973 to 2004): the potential role of health care. Ann Oncol 22: 1661-6.
15. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, et al. (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 11: 59-71.
16. Bailey TM, Delva J, Gretebeck K, Siefert K, Ismail A, (2005) A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women. Am J Health Prom 20: 96-107.
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, (2009) The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097.
18. DerSimonian R, Laird N, (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7: 177-88.
19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557-60.
20. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ, (1999) Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med 18: 2693-708.
21. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds) (2008) Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C, (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629.
23. Slater JS, Henly GA, Ha CN, Malone ME, Nyman JA, et al. (2005) Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 14: 2346-52.
24. Puschel K, Coronado G, Soto G, Gonzalez K, Martinez J, et al. (2010) Strategies for increasing mammography screening in primary care in Chile: results of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 19: 2254-2261.
25. Young RF, Waller JB Jr, Smitherman H, (2002) A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women. J Cancer Educ 17: 231-6.
26. Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ, Payne-Wilks K, Roland CL, et al. (2002) An intervention study on screening for breast cancer among single African-American women aged 65 and older. Prev Med 34: 536-45.
27. West DS, Greene P, Pulley L, Kratt P, Gore S, et al. (2004) Stepped-care, community clinic interventions to promote mammography use among low-income rural African American women. Health Educ Behav 31(4:Suppl): 29S-44S.
28. Kreuter MW, Sugg-Skinner C, Holt CL, Clark EM, Haire-Joshu D, et al. (2005) Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Prev Med 41: 53-62.
29. Powell ME, Carter V, Bonsi E, Johnson G, Williams L, et al. (2005) Increasing mammography screening among African American women in rural areas. J Health Care Poor Underserv 16 (4:Suppl A): 11-21.
30. Champion VL, Springston JK, Zollinger TW, Saywell RM, Monahan PO, et al. (2006) Comparison of three interventions to increase mammography screening in low income African American women. Cancer Detect Prev 30: 535-44.
31. Russell KM, Champion VL, Monahan PO, Millon-Underwood S, Zhao Q, et al. (2010) Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 19: 201-10.
32. Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Kingery P, Smith QW, Holcomb JD, (2003) Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns 50: 123-32.
33. Nuno T, Martinez ME, Harris R, Garcia F, (2011) A Promotora-administered group education intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in a rural community along the U.S.-Mexico border: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Causes Control 22: 367-74.
34. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Vida P, Warda US, (2003) Results of a randomized trial to increase breast and cervical cancer screening among Filipino American women. Prev Med 37: 102-9.
35. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, Robinson C, Greene MA, et al. (2006) Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Int Med 144: 563-71.
36. Paskett E, Tatum C, Rushing J, Michielutte R, Bell R, et al. (2006) Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 1226-37.
37. Kim YH, Sarna L, (2004) An intervention to increase mammography use by Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum 31: 105-10.
38. Denhaerynck K, Lesaffre E, Baele J, Cortebeeck K, Van OE, et al. (2003) Mammography screening attendance: meta-analysis of the effect of direct-contact invitation. Am J Prev Med 25: 195-203.
39. Page A, Morrell S, Chiu C, Taylor R, Tewson R, (2006) Recruitment to mammography screening: a randomised trial and meta-analysis of invitation letters and telephone calls. Aust N Z J Public Health 30: 111-8.
40. Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza JI, (2001) Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1: CD002943.
41. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening, (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380: 1778-86.
42. Atri J, Falshaw M, Gregg R, Robson J, Omar RZ, et al. (1997) Improving uptake of breast screening in multiethnic populations: a randomised controlled trial using practice reception staff to contact non-attenders. BMJ 315: 1356-9.
43. Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G, (1994) Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. J Epidemiol Community Health 48: 65-73.
44. Hoare T, Thomas C, Biggs A, Booth M, Bradley S, et al. (1994) Can the uptake of breast screening by Asian women be increased? A randomized controlled trial of a linkworker intervention. J Public Health Med 16: 179-185.
45. O'Connor AM, Griffiths CJ, Underwood MR, Eldridge S, (1998) Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice. J Med Screen 5: 49-52.
46. Han HR, Lee JE, Kim J, Hedlin HK, Song H, et al. (2009) A meta-analysis of interventions to promote mammography among ethnic minority women. Nurs Res 58: 246-54.
47. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books.
48. Howard M, Agarwal G, Lytwyn A, (2009) Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 20: 1-13.
49. Rimer BK, (1994) Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med 16: 317-326.
50. Doi SA, Thalib L, (2008) A quality-effects model for meta-analysis. Epidemiology 19: 94-100.
51. Ahmed NU, Haber G, Semenya KA, Hargreaves MK, (2010) Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 19: 1790-8.
52. Champion V, Skinner CS, Hui S, Monahan P, Juliar B, et al. (2007) The effect of telephone v. print tailoring for mammography adherence. Patient Educ Couns 65: 416-423.
53. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, Robinson CM, Reh M, et al. (2007) Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a medicaid managed care organization. Ann Fam Med 5: 320-7.
54. Mishra SI, Bastani R, Crespi CM, Chang LC, Luce PH, et al. (2007) Results of a randomized trial to increase mammogram usage among Samoan women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 16: 2594-2604.
55. Oleske DM, Galvez A, Cobleigh MA, Ganschow P, Ayala LD, (2007) Are tri-ethnic low-income women with breast cancer effective teachers of the importance of breast cancer screening to their first-degree relatives? Results from a randomized clinical trial. Breast J 13: 19-27.
56. Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, et al. (2010) Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1527-2.