Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 98, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 1226-1237

  Paskett, Electra D ^a,b   Tatum, Cathy ^b   Rushing, Julia ^c   Michielutte, Robert ^c   Bell, Ronny ^c   Foley, Kristie Long ^c   Bittoni, Marisa ^b   Dickinson, Stephanie L ^b   McAlearney, Ann Scheck ^a   Reeves, Katherine ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AMERICAN INDIAN; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR THEORY; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAMMOGRAPHY; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINORITY GROUP; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; RURAL POPULATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH CAROLINA; ODDS RATIO; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748687770     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj333     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006. Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2005.
2. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1672-80.
3. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2005;9:1245-56.
4. National Cancer Institute. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. Bethesda (MD): Author; 1993.
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:344-6.
6. Feig SA, Kopans DB, Sickles EA, Jackson VP, Monsees B. Rationale for annual screening mammography for women ages 40-49 years. Breast Dis 1998;10(3-4):13-21.
7. Ringash J. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: Screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer. CMAJ 2001;164:469-76.
8. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: Results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1704-13.
9. O'Malley MS, Earp JA, Harris RP. Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. Am J Public Health 1997;87:782-6.
10. Davis C, Emerson JS, Husaini BA. Breast cancer screening among African American women: Adherence to current recommendations. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2005;16:308-14.
11. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer 2002;94:2801-12.
12. Zhang P, Tao G, Irwin KL. Utilization of preventive medical services in the United States: A comparison between urban and rural populations. J Rural Health 2000;16:349-56.
13. Singh G, Miller B, Hankey B, Edwards B. Area socioeconomic variations in U.S. cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975-1999. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2003. Report No.: NIH Publ No. 03-5417.
14. Dignan MB, Michielutte R, Wells HB, Sharp P, Blinson K, Case LD, et al. Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian women in North Carolina. Health Educ Res 1998;13:545-56.
15. Michalek AM, Mahoney MC, Burhansstipanov L, Tenney M, Cobb N. Urban-based Native American cancer-control activities: Services and perceptions. J Cancer Educ 1996;11:159-63.
16. Giuliano A, Papenfuss M, de Guernsey de Zapien J, Tilousi S, Nuvayestewa L. Breast cancer screening among southwest American Indian women living on-reservation. Prev Med 1998;27:135-43.
17. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 2001.
18. Swan J. Cancer screening and risk factor rates among American Indians. Am J Public Health 2006;96:340-50.
19. Eng E. The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer 1993;72(Suppl):1071-7.
20. Earp JA, Viadro CI, Vincus AA, Altpeter M, Flax V, Mayne L, et al. Lay health advisors: A strategy for getting the word out about breast cancer. Health Educ Behav 1997;24:432-51.
21. Paskett ED, Tatum CM, D'Agostino RJ, Rushing J, Velez R, Michielutte R, et al. Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: Results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:453-9.
22. Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond P, Zwarenstein M, Aja G, van Wyk B, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(1): CD004015.
23. Andersen MR, Yasui Y, Meischke H, Kuniyuki A, Etzioni R, Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:199-207.
24. Bird JA, Otero-Sabogal R, Ha N, McPhee S. Tailoring lay health worker interventions for diverse cultures: Lessons learned from Vietnamese and Latina communities. Health Educ Q 1996;23(Suppl):S105-22.
25. Erwin DO, Spatz TS, Stotts RC, Hollenberg JA. Increasing mammography practice by African American women. Cancer Pract 1999;7:78-85.
26. Earp JA, Eng E, O'Malley MS, Altpeter M, Rauscher G, Mayne L, et al. Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. Am J Pub Health 2002;92:646-54.
27. Gotay CC, Banner RO, Matsunaga DS, Hedlund N, Enos R, Issell BF, et al. Impact of a culturally appropriate intervention on breast and cervical screening among native Hawaiian women. Prev Med 2000;31:529-37.
28. Lam TK, McPhee SJ, Mock J, Wong C, Doan HT, Nguyen T, et al. Encouraging Vietnamese-American women to obtain Pap tests through lay health worker outreach and media education. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18: 516-24.
29. Margolis KL, Lurie N, McGovern PG, Tyrrell M, Slater JS. Increasing breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income women. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:515-21.
30. Paskett ED, Cooper MR, Stark N, Ricketts TC, Tropman S, Hatzell T. Clinical trial enrollment of rural patients with cancer. Cancer Pract 2002;10:28-35.
31. Taylor VM, Hislop TG, Jackson JC, Tu S-P, Yasui Y, Schwartz SM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote cervical cancer screening among Chinese women in North America. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:670-7.
32. Paskett ED, Tatum CM, Rushing J, Michielutte R, Bell R, Long Foley K, et al. Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triraci rural population. Cancer 2004;101:2650-9
33. North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. North Carolina cancer mortality rates, 1998-2002: Annual Report; 2003.
34. North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. North Carolina cancer incidence rates: Annual Report; 2003.
35. Green L, Kreuter M. Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach. Mountain View (CA): Mayfi eld Publishing Company; 1991.
36. Green L, Kreuter M, Deeds S. Health education planning: A diagnostic approach. Palo Alto (CA): Mayfield Publishing Company; 1980.
37. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 1988;15:175-83.
38. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1977.
39. McGuire W. Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavior change. Prev Med 1984;13:299-319.
40. Rimer BK. Audiences and messages about breast and cervical cancer screening. Wellness Perspect Res Theory Pract 1995;11:13-39.
41. Paskett ED, McMahon K, Tatum CM, Velez R, Shelton B, Case LD, et al. Clinic-based interventions to promote breast and cervical cancer screening. Prev Med 1998;27:120-8.
42. Paskett ED, Rushing J, D'Agostino R, Tatum CM, Velez R. Cancer screening behaviors of low-income women: The impact of race. Womens Health 1997;3:203-26.
43. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2000.
44. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method for correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1.
45. SAS/STAT SOFTWARE. SAS/STAT Software of the SAS System for Windows, Copyright (c) 2002-2003. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
46. Andersen MR, Hager MH, Su C, Urban N. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Educ Behav 2002;29:755-70.
47. Rimer BK, Resch N, King E, Ross E, Lerman C, Boyce A, et al. Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep 1992;107:369-80.
48. Harris R, Leininger L. Clinical strategies for breast cancer screening: weighing and using the evidence. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:539-47.
49. Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey studies. JAMA 1990;264:54-8.
50. Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Brogan DJ, Gammon MD, Malone KE, Swanson CA, et al. Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:431-42.
51. Ostbye T, Greenberg GN, Taylor DH, Lee AM. Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: Results from the Health and Retirement (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics among the oldest old (AHEAD). Ann Fam Med 2003;1:209-17.
52. Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:749-57.
53. Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: A meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:759-67.
54. Brownstein JN, Cheal N, Ackermann SP, Basswford TL, Compos-Outcalt D. Breast and cervical cancer screening in minority populations: A model for using lay health educators. J Cancer Educ 1992;7:321-6.
55. Love M, Gardner K, Legion V. Community health workers: Who they are and what they do. Health Educ Behav 1997;24:510-22.
56. Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med 2004;38:754-60.
57. McGovern PG, Lurie N, Margolis KL, Slater JS. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:201-8.
58. Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, Ford LD, Egelhofer J, Cloud WM, et al. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: The accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1016-21.