Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization

Annals of Family Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 320-327

  Dietrich, Allen J ^a,f   Tobin, Jonathan N ^b,c   Cassells, Andrea ^b   Robinson, Christina M ^a   Reh, Meredith ^d   Romero, Karen A ^d   Flood, Ann Barry ^a,e   Beach, Michael L ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Clinical Directors Network   (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Affinity Health Plan   (United States)

^e Dartmouth College   (United States)

^f DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms ethnology prevention control; Colorectal neoplasms ethnology prevention control; Intervention studies; Managed care programs; New York City; Poverty; Telephone; Uterine cervical neoplasms ethnology prevention control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAID; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELEPHONE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAID; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TELEPHONE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34548078933     PISSN: 15441709     EISSN: 15441717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1370/afm.701     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jacobellis J, Cutter G. Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1144-1150.
2. O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, Feng S, Mandelblatt J. Disparities despite coverage: gaps in colorectal cancer screening among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(18):2129-2135.
3. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2003. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr03/nhdr03.htm. Accessed 20 October 2006.
4. Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(22):1686-1693.
5. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, and Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
6. Chien C, Morimoto LM, Tom J, Li CI. Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity. Cancer. 2005;104(3):629-639.
7. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001;33(3):190-203.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status - 35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(39):981-985.
9. Thorpe LE, Mostashari F, Feldman G, et al. Cancer screening in New York City: we can do much better. NYC Vital Signs. 2003;2(2):2003.
10. Mitchell MK, Gregersen PK, Johnson S, Parsons R, Vlahov D. The New York Cancer Project: rationale, organization, design, and baseline characteristics. J Urban Health. 2004;81(2):301-310.
11. Karpati A, Kerker B, Mostashari F, Singh T, Hajat A, Thorpe L. Health Disparities in New York City 2004. New York, NY: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2004.
12. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):563-571.
13. Davis K. A need to transform the U.S. health care system: improving access, quality, and efficiency. Plenary address to the National Association of Community Health Centers Strategic Planning Retreat, Washington, DC, March 27, 2006.
14. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1624-1632.
15. Glasgow RE, Magid DJ, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks PA. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005;43(6):551-557.
16. Kell SH, Allison JJ, Brown KC, Weissman NW, Farmer R, Kiefe C. Measurement of mammography rates for quality improvement. Qual Manag Health Care. 1999;7(2):11-19.
17. Diamond C, Rask K, Kohler S. Use of paper medical records versus administrative data for measuring and improving health care quality: are we still searching for a gold standard? Dis Manage. 2001;4(3):121-130.
18. Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Pap screening in a U.S. health plan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(3):355-360.
19. Roetzheim RG, Christman LK, Jacobsen PB, et al. A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(4):294-300.
20. Roetzheim RG, Christman LK, Jacobsen PB, Schroeder J, Abdulla R, Hunter S. Long-term results from a randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(2):109-114.
21. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Tallia AF, et al. Delivery of clinical preventive services in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(5):430-435.
22. Sardell A. Clinical networks and clinician retention: the case of CDN. J Community Health. 1996;21(6):437-451.
23. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 Part 1):347-360.
24. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.
25. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):129-131.
26. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2005 Summary Table of Measures and Product Lines. 2005. http://www.ncqa.org/Programs/HEDIS/2005/ MeasuresList.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2006.
27. Ogedegbe G, Cassells AN, Robinson CM, et al. Perceptions of barriers and facilitators of cancer early detection among low-income minority women in community health centers. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(2):162-170.
28. Stata Statistical Software; release 8.0 program. College Station, Tex: Stata Corp; 2003.
29. Luckmann R, Savageau JA, Clemow L, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME. A randomized trial of telephone counseling to promote screening mammography in two HMOs. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(6):442-450.
30. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1):1-10.
31. Valanis BG, Glasgow RE, Mullooly J, et al. Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and Pap tests. Prev Med. 2002;34(1):40-50.
32. Goins KV, Zapka JG, Geiger AM, et al. Implementation of systems strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening services in health maintenance organizations. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9(11):745-755.
33. Altman DG. Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychol. 1995;14(6):526-536.
34. Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Luckmann R, White MJ, Spitz Avrunin J, Clemow L. Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(1):39-46.
35. Walsh EG, Osber DS, Nason CA, Porell MA, Asciutto AJ. Quality improvement in a primary care case management program. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;23(4):71-84.
36. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to- effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261-1267.
37. Eisenberg JM, Power EJ. Transforming insurance coverage into quality health care: voltage drops from potential to delivered quality. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2100-2102.