Reported mammographic density: Film-screen versus digital acquisition

Radiology

Volumn 266, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 752-758

  Harvey, Jennifer A ^a   Gard, Charlotte C ^b   Miglioretti, Diana L ^b   Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^c   Kerlikowske, Karla ^d   Buist, Diana S M ^e   Geller, Berta A ^f   Onega, Tracy L ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^g NORRIS COTTON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILM SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHIC BREAST DENSITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 84874325488     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120221     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3): 227-236.
2. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(9): 670-675.
3. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(21): 1622-1629.
4. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230(1): 29-41.
5. Baltzell K, Wrensch MR. Strengths and limitations of breast cancer risk assessment. Oncol Nurs Forum 2005;32(3): 605-616.
6. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 2004;23(7): 1111-1130.
7. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98(17): 1215-1226.
8. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(5): 337-347.
9. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98(17): 1204-1214.
10. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
11. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4): 1010-1018.
12. Fischmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Müller-Schimpfle M. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection. Br J Radiol 2005;78(928): 312-315.
13. Hasmimoto B. Digital mammographic appearance of benign and malignant calcifications. In: Practical digital mammography. New York, NY: Thieme Medical, 2007; 19-89.
14. Harvey JA. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3(6): 611-616.
15. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(4): 1001-1008.
16. National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. BCSC. Glossary of Terms. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/ data/elements.html. Updated December 16, 2010. Accessed November 12, 2011.
17. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
18. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(5): 1261-1265.
19. Phipps AI, Ichikawa L, Bowles EJA, et al. Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. Maturitas 2010;67(1): 60-66.
20. National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. National Cancer Institute Website. http://www.cancer. gov/bcrisktool/. Updated May 16, 2011. Accessed May 16, 2011.
21. Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, et al. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(2): 418-428.
22. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(7): 1473-1482.
23. Heine JJ, Fowler EE, Flowers CI. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements. Acad Radiol 2011;18(11): 1430-1436.
24. Highnam R, Jeffreys M, McCormack V, Warren R, Davey Smith G, Brady M. Comparing measurements of breast density. Phys Med Biol 2007;52(19): 5881-5895.
25. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155(8): 493-502.
26. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA, et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. RadioGraphics 1998;18(6): 1587-1598.
27. Garrido-Estepa M, Ruiz-Perales F, Miranda J, et al. Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales. BMC Cancer 2010;10: 485.
28. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005;14(4): 269-275.
29. Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 2006;13(9): 1143-1149.
30. Ooms EA, Zonderland HM, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 2007;16(6): 568-576.
31. Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(5): 386-395.