Bayes and Base Rates: What Is an Informative Prior for Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment?

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 103-124

  Harris, Grant T ^a   Rice, Marnie E ^a  

^a Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 84874287266     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2048     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Airoldi, E. M., Anderson, A. G., Fienberg, S. E., & Skinner, K. K. (2006). Who wrote Ronald Reagan's radio addresses? Bayesian Analysis, 2, 289-320.doi:10.1214/06-BA110
2. Aldrich, J. (2008). R. A. Fisher on Bayes and Bayes' theorem. Bayesian Analysis, 3, 161-170. doi:10.1214/08-BA306
3. Beauregard, E., & Mieczkowski, T. (2009). Testing the predictive utility of the STATIC-99: A Bayes analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 187-200. doi:10.1348/135532508X330994
4. Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407-425. doi: 10.1037/a0021524
5. Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698-708.doi:10.2307/2095923
6. Bishop, M. A. (2000). In praise of epistemic irresponsibility: How lazy and ignorant can you be? Synthese, 122, 179-208. doi:10.1023/A:1005228312224
7. Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571
8. Dawes, R. M. (2002). The ethics of using or not using statistical prediction rules in psychological practice and related consulting activities. Philosophy of Science, 178-184. doi: 10.1086/341844
9. Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274-290. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920
10. Efron, B. (2013). A 250-year argument: Belief, behavior, and the bootstrap. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50, 129-146. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-2012-01374-5.
11. Feinberg, S. E. (2006). When did Bayesian inference become "Bayesian"? Bayesian Analysis, 1, 1-40.doi:10.1214/06-BA101
12. Fennell, J., & Baddeley, R. (2012). Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: An intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function. Psychological Review, 119, 878-887. doi: 10.10337/a0029346
13. Gelman, A. (2008). Objections to Bayesian statistics. Bayesian Analysis, 3, 445-450. doi: 10.1214/08-BA318
14. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
15. Goldstein, M. (2006). Subjective Bayesian analysis: Principles and practice. Bayesian Analysis, 3, 403-420.
16. Goodman, S. N. (2005). Introduction to Bayesian methods 1: Measuring the strength of evidence. Clinical Trials, 2, 282-290. doi:10.1191/1740774505vn098oa
17. Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111-119. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8
18. Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2007a). Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1638-1656. doi:10.1177/0093854807307029
19. Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2007b). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging and the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 297-313. doi:10.1177/0093854806293486
20. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Camilleri, J. A. (2004). Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1063-1074.doi:10.1177/0886260504268004
21. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2002). Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 377-394.doi:10.1023/A:1016347320889
22. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335. doi:10.1177/0093854893020004001
23. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2010). Allegiance or fidelity? A clarifying reply. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 82-89. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01197.x
24. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Lalumière, M. L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.413
25. Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26. Hill, J. L. (2011). Bayesian nonparametric modeling for causal inference. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 20, 217-240. doi:10.1198/jcgs.2010.08162
27. Jensen, S. T., McShane, B. B., & Wyner, A. J. (2009). Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of hitting performance in baseball. Bayesian Analysis, 4, 631-652. doi:10.1214/09-BA424
28. Koehler, J. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1-53. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00041157
29. Liu, Y. M., Chen, S. L., Yen, A. M., & Chen, H. (2012). Individual risk prediction model for incident cardiovascular disease: A Bayesian clinical reasoning approach. International Journal of Cardiology. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.016
30. Mazur, D. J. (2012). A history of evidence in medical decisions: From the diagnostic sign to Bayesian inference. Medical Decision Making, 32, 227-231. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11434739
31. McGrayne, S. B. (2011). The theory that would not die: How Bayes' rule cracked the enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, and emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. McMillan, G. P., Bedrick, E., & C'deBaca, J. (2009). A Bayesian model for estimating the effects of drug use when drug use may be under-reported. Addiction, 104, 1820-1826. doi:10.1111/j.1360-9443.2009.02644.x
33. Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194-216. doi:10.1037/h0048070
34. Mokros, A., Stadtland, C., Osterheider, M., & Nedopil, N. (2010). Assessment of risk for violent recidivism through multivariate Bayesian classification. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 418-450. doi:10.1037/a0021312
35. Mossman, D. (2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 41-63. doi:10.1177/107906320601800104
36. Mossman, D., & Somoza, E. (1992). Balancing risks and benefits: Another approach to optimizing diagnostic tests. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 4, 331-335. doi:10.1177/0272989X9201200303
37. Newcombe, P. J., Reck, B. H., Sun, J., Platek, G. T., Verzilli, C., Kader, A. K., Xu, J. (2012). A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches to incorporating external information for the prediction of prostate cancer risk. Genetic Epidemiology, 36, 71-83. doi:10.1002/gepi.21600
38. O'Hagan, A., & Luce, B. R. (2003). A primer on Bayesian statistics in health economics and outcomes research. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield Centre for Bayesian Statistics in Health Economics.
39. Oleson, J. J. (2010). Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 19, 559-574. doi:10.1177/0962280209349008
40. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
41. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). The actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85-105. doi:10.1177/088626095010001006
43. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.737
44. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241. doi:10.1023/A:1024882430242
45. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC, Cohen's d and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
46. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2012). What does it mean when age is related to recidivism among sex offenders? Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (in press). The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. In Hoberman H., & Phenix A. (Eds.), Sexual offenders: Diagnosis, risk assessment and management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Cormier, C. A. (1992). Evaluation of a maximum security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 399-412. doi:10.1007/BF02352266
49. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Lang, C. (2012). Validation of and revision to the Violence Risk Appraisal and Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guides based on a long-term follow-up. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., Lang, C., & Bell, V. (1990). Recidivism among male insanity acquittees. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 18, 379-403. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(90)90017-W
51. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., Lang, C., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records? Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
52. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435-448. doi:10.1177/088626090005004001
53. Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Harris, G. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.381
54. Scurich, N., & John, R. S. (2011). A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9286-0
55. Sebastiani, P., Solovieff, N., & Sun, J. X. (2012). Naïve Bayesian classifier and genetic risk score for genetic risk prediction of a categorical trait: Not so different after all. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, 26. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00026
56. Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 380-400. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380
57. Thompson, W. C., & Schumann, E. L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 167-187.doi:10.1007/BF01044641
58. Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem. Psychological Review, 110, 526-535. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.526
59. Vrieze, S. I., & Grove, W. M. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of criminal recidivism: Problems, pitfalls, and proposed solutions. Psychological Assessment, 22, 382-395. doi:10.1037/a0019228
60. Williamson, S., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1987). Violence: Criminal psychopaths and their victims. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 454-462. doi:10.1037/h0080003
61. Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarial are used to identify sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56-85. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.56