Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 559-574

  Oleson, Jacob J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; BIOSTATISTICS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649974877     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280209349008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Guyatt G., Sackett D., Adachi J., et al. A clinician's guide for conducting randomized trials in individual patients. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1988 ; 139: 497-503.
2. Larson EB, Ellsworth AJ, Oas J. Randomized clinical trials in single patients during a 2-year period. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993 ; 270: 2708-12.
3. Kravitz RL, Duan N., White RH N-of-1 trials of expensive biological therapies. Archives of Internal Medicine 2008 ; 168: 1030-3.
4. Ezzet F., Whitehead J. A random effects model for binary data from crossover clinical trials. Applied Statistics 1992 ; 41: 117-26.
5. Schluter PJ, Ware RS Single patient (n-of-1) trials with binary treatment preference. Statistics in Medicine 2005 ; 24 (17). 2625-36.
6. Kirk RE Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1996 ; 56: 746-59.
7. Tango T. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Statistics in Medicine 1998 ; 17: 891-908.
8. Lloyd CJ Confidence intervals for the difference between two correlated proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1990 ; 85: 1154-58.
9. Newcombe RG Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Statistics in Medicine 1998 ; 17: 2635-50.
10. Hashemi L., Nandram B., Goldberg R. Bayesian analysis for a single 2 × 2 Table. Statistics in Medicine 1997 ; 16: 1311-28.
11. Shi L., Bai P. Bayesian confidence interval for the difference of two proportions in the matched-paired design. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 2008 ; 37 (13). 2034-51.
12. Agresti A., Min Y. Frequentist performance of bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrics 2005 ; 61 (2). 515-23.
13. Thornton AR, Raffin MJM. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1978 ; 21: 507-18.
14. Carney E., Schlauch RS Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2007 ; 50: 1203-9.
15. Freeman MF, Tukey JW Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1950 ; 21: 607-11.
16. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion and asymptotic expansions. The Annals of Statistics 2002 ; 30 (1). 160-201.
17. Robert CP Appendix A. In the Bayesian choice: a decision-theoretic motivation. Springer-Verlag, New York ; 1994: 382.
18. Olkin I., Liu R. A bivariate beta distribution. Statistics & Probability Letters 2003 ; 62: 407-12.
19. Gilks WR, Richardson S., Spiegelhalter DJ Markov chain Monte carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall, London ; 1996.
20. Wilson B. Cochlear implant technology. In Niparko JK, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, Robbins AM, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, New York ; 2000: 109-18.
21. Gantz BJ, Turner CW Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003 ; 113: 1726-30.
22. Gantz BJ, Turner CW Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngologica 2004 ; 24: 344-47.
23. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW Preservation of Hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005 ; 115: 796-802.
24. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE Acoustic plus electric speech processing: results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Audiology and Neurotology 2006 ; 11: 63-8.
25. Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ Hybrid 10 clinical trial: Preliminary results. Audiology and Neurotology 2009 ; 14: 32-8.