The significance of hydrated surface molecular mobility in the control of the morphology of adhering fibroblasts

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 3206-3214

  Seo, Ji Hun ^a,d   Kakinoki, Sachiro ^b,d   Inoue, Yuuki ^c,d   Nam, Kwangwoo ^a,d   Yamaoka, Tetsuji ^b,d   Ishihara, Kazuhiko ^c,d   Kishida, Akio ^a,d   Yui, Nobuhiko ^a,d  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Molecular mobility; Polyrotaxane; Protein adsorption; Surface free energy

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS MEDIA; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CONVENTIONAL POLYMERS; FIBROBLAST ADHESION; FIBRONECTIN ADSORPTION; MOLECULAR MOBILITY; POLYMER SURFACES; POLYROTAXANES; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; QUARTZ CRYSTAL; RANDOM COPOLYMER; SURFACE FREE ENERGY;

ADSORPTION; BLOCK COPOLYMERS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLASTS; FREE ENERGY; HYDRATION; MORPHOLOGY;

POLYMERS;

ALPHA CYCLODEXTRIN; COPOLYMER; FIBRONECTIN; POLYMER; POLYROTAXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DENSITY; ENERGY; FIBROBLAST; HYDRATED SURFACE MOLECULAR MOBILITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL SHAPE; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; POLYMERS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER;

EID: 84874226762     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.080     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chen H., Yuan L., Song W., Wu Z., Li D. Biocompatible polymer materials: role of protein-surface interaction. Prog Polym Sci 2008, 33:1059-1087.
2. Horbett T.A., Brash J.L. Proteins at interfaces II: fundamentals and applications. ACS symposium series 1995, vol. 602. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
3. Seo J.-H., Matsuno R., Takai M., Ishihara K. Cell adhesion on phase-separated surface of block copolymer composed of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) and poly(dimethylsiloxane). Biomaterials 2009, 30:5330-5340.
4. Hoshi R.A., Lith R.V., Jen M.C., Allen J.B., Lapidos K.A., Ameer G. The blood and vascular cell compatibility of heparin-modified ePTFE vascular grafts. Biomaterials 2013, 34:30-41.
5. Kim H.I., Ishihara K., Lee S., Seo J.-H., Kim H.Y., Suh D., et al. Tissue response to poly(L-lactic acid)-based blend with phospholipid polymer for degradable cardiovascular stents. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2241-2247.
6. Meredith S.C. Protein denaturation and aggregation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1066:181-221.
7. Seo J.-H., Shibayama T., Takai M., Ishihara K. Quick and simple modification of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface by optimized molecular design of the anti-biofouling phospholipid copolymer. Soft Matter 2011, 7:2968-2976.
8. Khoutorsky M., Lichtenstein A., Krishnan R., Rajendran K., Mayo A., Kam Z., et al. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nat Cell Biol 2011, 13:1457-1465.
9. Engler A.J., Shen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
10. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:17-26.
11. Gilbert P.M., Havenstrite K.L., Magnusson K.E.G., Sacco A., Leonardi N.A., Kraft P., et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 2010, 329:1078-1081.
12. Mager M.D., LaPointe V., Stevens M.M. Exploring and exploiting chemistry at the cell surface. Nat Chem 2011, 3:582-589.
13. Seo J.-H., Yui N. The effect of molecular mobility of supramolecular polymer surfaces on fibroblast adhesion. Biomaterials 2013, 34:55-63.
14. Grinnell F., Ho C.-H. The effect of growth factor environment on fibroblast morphological response to substrate stiffness. Biomaterials 2013, 34:965-974.
15. Seo J.-H., Kakinoki S., Inoue Y., Yamaoka T., Ishihara K., Yui N. Designing dynamic surfaces for regulation of biological responses. Soft Matter 2012, 8:5477-5485.
16. Owens D.K., Wendt R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969, 13:1741-1747.
17. Inoue Y., Ye L., Ishihara K., Yui N. Preparation and surface properties of polyrotaxane-containing tri-block copolymers as a design for dynamic biomaterials surfaces. Colloid Surf B 2012, 89:223-227.
18. Vogler E.A. Protein adsorption in three dimensions. Biomaterials 2012, 33:1201-1237.
19. Tretinnikov O.N. Selective accumulation of functional groups at the film surfaces of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate)s. Langmuir 1997, 13:2988-2992.
20. Chapman R.G., Ostuni E., Takayama S., Holmlin R.E., Yan L., Whitesides G.M. Surveying for surfaces that resist the adsorption of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 2000, 122:8303-8304.
21. Ostuni E., Chapman R.G., Holmlin R.E., Takayama S., Whitesides G.M. A survey of structure-property relationships of surface that resist the adsorption of protein. Langmuir 2001, 17:5605-5620.
22. Parhi P., Golas A., Barnthip N., Noh H., Vogler E.A. Volumetric interpretation of protein adsorption: capacity scaling with adsorbate molecular weight and adsorbent surface energy. Biomaterials 2009, 30:6814-6824.
23. Noh H., Vogler E.A. Volumetric interpretation of protein adsorption: mass and energy balance for albumin adsorption to particulate adsorbents with incrementally increasing hydrophilicity. Biomaterials 2006, 27:5801-5812.
24. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
25. Martin P. Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997, 276:75-81.