The effect of molecular mobility of supramolecular polymer surfaces on fibroblast adhesion

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 55-63

  Seo, Ji Hun ^a,b   Yui, Nobuhiko ^a,b  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Fibronectin; Molecular mobility; Polyrotaxane

Indexed keywords

ADHESION BEHAVIORS; CELLULAR RESPONSE; FIBROBLAST ADHESION; FIBRONECTIN; HYDROPHOBIC ANCHORING; METHOXY GROUP; MOLECULAR MOBILITY; POLYMER SURFACES; POLYROTAXANES; RANDOM COPOLYMER; SUPRAMOLECULAR POLYMERS;

BLOCK COPOLYMERS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; HYDRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; POLYMERS;

FIBROBLASTS;

BIOMATERIAL; COPOLYMER; FIBRONECTIN; POLYMER; POLYROTAXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HYDRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MOBILITY; NONHUMAN; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE; SERUM; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CYCLODEXTRINS; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MOTION; NIH 3T3 CELLS; POLOXAMER; POLYMERS; QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE TECHNIQUES; ROTAXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84868123309     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.063     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chen H., Yuan L., Song W., Wu Z., Li D. Biocompatible polymer materials: role of protein-surface interaction. Prog Polym Sci 2008, 33:1059-1087.
2. Horbett T.A., Brash J.L. Proteins at interfaces II: fundamentals and applications. ACS symposium series 1995, vol. 602. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
3. GuvendirenM Burdick JA. The control of stem cell morphology and differentiation by hydrogel surface wrinkles. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6511-6518.
4. Lipski A.M., Pino C.H., Haselton F.T., Chen I.W., Shastri V.P. The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3836-3846.
5. Seo J.-H., Matsuno R., Takai M., Ishihara K. Cell adhesion on phase-separated surface of block copolymer composed of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) and poly(dimethylsiloxane). Biomaterials 2009, 30:5330-5340.
6. Aizawa Y., Owen S.C., Shoichet M.S. Polymers used to influence cell fate in 3D geometry: new trends. Prog Polym Sci 2012, 37:645-658.
7. Khoutorsky M., Lichtenstein A., Krishnan R., Rajendran K., Mayo A., Kam Z., et al. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nat Cell Biol 2011, 13:1457-1465.
8. Mager M.D., LaPointe V., Stevens M.M. Exploring and exploiting chemistry at the cell surface. Nat Chem 2011, 3:582-589.
9. Kennedy L., Shi-Wen X., Carter D.E., Abraham D.J., Leask A. Fibroblast adhesion results in the induction of a matrix remodeling gene expression program. Matrix Biol 2008, 27:274-281.
10. Meyers S.R., Khoo X., Huang X., Walsh E.B., Grinstaff M.W., Kenan D.J. The development of peptide-based interfacial biomaterials for generating biological functionality on the surface of bioinert materials. Biomaterials 2009, 30:277-286.
11. Ishida N., Biggs S. Effect of grafting density on phase transition behavior for poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes in aqueous solutions studied by AFM and QCM-D. Macromolecules 2010, 43:7269-7276.
12. Ooya T., Eguchi M., Yui N. Supramolecular design for multivalent interaction: maltose mobility along polyrotaxane enhanced binding with concanavalin A. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125:13016-13017.
13. Seo J.-H., Kakinoki S., Inoue Y., Yamaoka T., Ishihara K., Yui N. Designing dynamic surfaces for regulation of biological responses. Soft Matter 2012, 8:5477-5485.
14. Mitsukami Y., Donovan M.S., Lowe A.B., McCormick C.L. Water-soluble polymers. 81. Direct synthesis of hydrophilic styrenic-based homopolymers and block copolymers in aqueous solution via RAFT. Macromolecules 2001, 34:2248-2256.
15. Zalipsky S., Gilon C., Zilkha A. Attachment of drugs to polyethylene glycols. Eur Polym J 1983, 19:1177-1183.
16. Inoue Y., Ye L., Ishihara K., Yui N. Preparation and surface properties of polyrotaxane-coating tri-block copolymers as a design for dynamic biomaterials surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2012, 89:223-227.
17. Eisele N.B., Andersson F.I., Frey S., Richter R.P. Viscoelasticity of thin biomolecular films: a case study on nucleoporin phenylalanine-glycine repeats grafted to a histidine-tag capturing QCM-D sensor. Biomacromolecules 2012, 10.1021/bm300577s.
18. Moursi A.M., Globus R.K., Damsky C.H. Interactions between integrin recpetors and fibronectin are required for calvarial osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J Cell Sci 1997, 110:2187-2196.
19. Cutler S.M., Garcia A.J. Engineering cell adhesive surfaces that direct integrin a5b1 binding using a recombinant fragment of fibronectin. Biomaterials 2003, 24:1759-1770.
20. Goddard J.M., Hotchkiss J.H. Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32:698-725.
21. Roach P., Parker T., Gadegaard N., Alexander M.R. Surface strategies for control of neuronal cell adhesion: a review. Surf Sci Rep 2010, 65:145-173.
22. Smith K.E., Hyzy S.L., Sunwoo M.H., Gall K.A., Schwartz Z., Boyan B.D. The dependence of MG63 osteoblast responses to (meth)acrylate-based networks on chemical structure and stiffness. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6131-6141.