C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the wrist and elbow: First experiences in human cadavers

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 419-429

  Guggenberger, Roman ^a   Morsbach, Fabian ^a   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a   Vich, Magdalena ^b   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Hodler, Juerg ^a   Andreisek, Gustav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Arthrography; Cone beam CT; Flat panel CT; Fluoroscopy; Optimal contrast

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BONES OF THE ARM AND HAND; C ARM FLAT PANEL COMPUTER ASSISTED ARTHROGRAPHY; CADAVER; CARTILAGE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY NUMBER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; ELBOW RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGY PHANTOM; SOFT TISSUE; STANDARD; WRIST RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTHROGRAPHY; CADAVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ELBOW JOINT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WRIST JOINT; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 84874189529     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1501-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Roemer FW, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Guermazi A. Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage. Radiology. 2011;260(2):332-54.
2. De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Pogliacomi F, Sverzellati N, Corradi D, Garlaschi G, et al. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the knee: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(2):342-51.
3. De Filippo M, Pogliacomi F, Bertellini A, Araoz PA, Averna R, Sverzellati N, et al. MDCT arthrography of the wrist: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(1):221-5.
4. Cochet H, Pele E, Amoretti N, Brunot S, Lafenetre O, Hauger O. Anterolateral ankle impingement: diagnostic performance of MDCT arthrography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1575-80.
5. Fischer W, Bohndorf K, Kreitner KF, Schmitt R, Wortler K, Zentner J. Indications for CT and MR arthrography-recommendations of the musculoskeletal workgroup of the DRG. Rofo. 2009;181(5):441-6.
6. El-Khoury GY, Alliman KJ, Lundberg HJ, Rudert MJ, Brown TD, Saltzman CL. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;233(3):768-73.
7. Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45 Suppl 1:S4-10.
8. De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Sverzellati N, Pogliacomi F, Costantino C, Vitale M, et al. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the shoulder: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(5):540-9.
9. Kyriakou Y, Struffert T, Dorfler A, Kalender WA. Basic principles of flat detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Radiologe. 2009;49(9):811-9.
10. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol. 2007;17(11):2767-79.
11. De Cock J, Mermuys K, Goubau J, Van Petegem S, Houthoofd B, Casselman JW. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(1):93-6.
12. Ramdhian-Wihlm R, Le Minor JM, Schmittbuhl M, Jeantroux J, Mahon PM, Veillon F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography arthrography: an innovative modality for the evaluation of wrist ligament and cartilage injuries. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(8):963-9.
13. Wang G, Crawford CR, Kalender WA. Multirow detector and cone-beam spiral/helical CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19(9):817-21.
14. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):265-73.
15. Jelinek J, Overton TR. Simulation of CT reconstruction artifacts associated with multiple-rotation fan-beam data collection. Comput Radiol. 1986;10(1):23-36.
16. Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC, Rusch O, Marin D, Schmidt B, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260(2):454-62.
17. Struffert T, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Kloska S, Engelhorn T, Strother CM, Kalender WA, et al. Flat detector CT in the evaluation of brain parenchyma, intracranial vasculature, and cerebral blood volume: a pilot study in patients with acute symptoms of cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(8):1462-9.
18. Penzkofer T, Isfort P, Bruners P, Wiemann C, Kyriakou Y, Kalender WA, et al. Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(11):2656-62.
19. Struffert T, Richter G, Engelhorn T, Doelken M, Goelitz P, Kalender WA, et al. Visualisation of intracerebral haemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(3):619-25.
20. Suzuki S, Yamaguchi I, Kidouchi T, Yamamoto A, Masumoto T, Ozaki Y. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(2):376-82.
21. Phan CM, Macklin EA, Bredella MA, Dadrich M, Flechsig P, Yoo AJ, et al. Trabecular structure analysis using C-arm CT: comparison with MDCT and flat-panel volume CT. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;40(8):1065-72.
22. Walsh CJ, Phan CM, Misra M, Bredella MA, Miller KK, Fazeli PK, et al. Women with anorexia nervosa: finite element and trabecular structure analysis by using flat-panel volume CT. Radiology. 2010;257(1):167-74.
23. Bredella MA, Misra M, Miller KK, Madisch I, Sarwar A, Cheung A, et al. Distal radius in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa: trabecular structure analysis with high-resolution flat-panel volume CT. Radiology. 2008;249(3):938-46.
24. Guggenberger R, Fischer MA, Hodler J, Pfammatter T, Andreisek G. Flat-panel CT arthrography: feasibility study and comparison to multidetector CT arthrography. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(5):312-8.
25. Moser T, Dosch JC, Moussaoui A, Buy X, Gangi A, Dietemann JL. Multidetector CT arthrography of the wrist joint: how to do it. Radiographics. 2008;28(3):787-800. quiz 911.
26. Steinbach LS, Schwartz M. Elbow arthrography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;36(4):635-49.
27. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213-20.
28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
29. Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology. 2000;217(2):430-5.
30. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology. 2005;237(3):945-51.