Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 376-382

  Suzuki, Shigeru ^a,b   Yamaguchi, Ichiro ^c   Kidouchi, Takashi ^b   Yamamoto, Asako ^b   Masumoto, Tomohiko ^d   Ozaki, Yutaka ^e  

^a SAITAMA RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY NERIMA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angiography; Dosimetry; Experimental investigations; Interventional; Radiation safety

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETER; DOSIMETRY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION ABSORPTION; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIATION SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ANGIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL;

EID: 79955561792     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: 1432086X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9893-z     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. S Hirota N Nakao S Yamamoto, et al. 2006 Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29 1034 1038 10.1007/s00270-005-0287-6 (Pubitemid 44661954)
2. JH Siewerdsen DJ Moseley S Burch, et al. 2005 Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery Med Phys 32 241 254 10.1118/1.1836331 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FovFOksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40165536)
3. S Suzuki S Furui I Yamaguchi, et al. 2009 Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system Radiology 250 545 550 10.1148/radiol.2502080695
4. MA Cornier CW Tate GK Grunwald, et al. 2002 Relationship between waist circumference, body mass index, and medical care costs Obesity Res 10 1167 1172 10.1038/oby.2002.158 (Pubitemid 135686659)
5. Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Servomaa A (1997) PCXMC-a PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations. Report STUK-A139. Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Helsinki
6. Cristy M (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. Annual progress report 5, ORNL/NUREG/TM-367. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
7. Jones DG, Wall BF (1985) Organ doses from medical X-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. National radiological protection board report NRPB-R186. HMSO, London
8. M Zankl N Petoussi G Drexler 1992 Effective dose and effective dose equivalent-the impact of the new ICRP definition for external photon irradiation Health Phys 62 395 399 10.1097/00004032-199205000-00002 1:STN:280: DyaK383hvVWksA%3D%3D
9. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1995) Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 4. Inhalation dose coefficients. ICRP Publ. 71. Ann ICRP 25(3-4). Pergamon Press, Oxford
10. S Akpek T Brunner G Benndorf, et al. 2005 Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector Diagn Interv Radiol 11 10 13 (Pubitemid 40484952)
11. R Ishikura K Ando Y Nagami, et al. 2006 Evaluation of vascular supply with cone-beam computed tomography during intraarterial chemotherapy for a skull base tumor Radiat Med 24 384 387 10.1007/s11604-006-0038-x (Pubitemid 44379425)
12. V Tsapaki E Vano I Muavrikou, et al. 2008 Comparison of patient dose in two-dimensional carotid arteriography and three-dimensional rotational angiography CardioVasc Interv Radiol 31 477 482 10.1007/s00270-007-9190-7 (Pubitemid 351653628)
13. J Li UK Udayasankar TL Toth, et al. 2007 Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose Am J Roentgenol 188 547 552 10.2214/AJR.06.0370 (Pubitemid 46167758)
14. Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1994) Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. National radiological protection board report NRPB-R262. HMSO, London, pp 30-31
15. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP, pp 159-171