Flat-panel CT arthrography: Feasibility study and comparison to multidetector CT Arthrography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 312-318

  Guggenberger, Roman ^a   Fischer, Michael Alexander ^a   Hodler, Juerg ^a   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Andreisek, Gustav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

arthrography; cone beam CT; flat panel CT

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FLAT PANEL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84859903931     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182419082     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coan P, Bamberg F, Diemoz PC, et al. Characterization of osteoarthritic and normal human patella cartilage by computed tomography X-ray phasecontrast imaging: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:437-444.
2. De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Pogliacomi F, et al. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the knee: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70:342-351.
3. De Filippo M, Pogliacomi F, Bertellini A, et al. MDCT arthrography of the wrist: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:221-225.
4. Cochet H, Pele E, Amoretti N, et al. Anterolateral ankle impingement: diagnostic performance of MDCT arthrography and sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1575-1580.
5. Prell D, Kyriakou Y, Kachelrie M, et al. Reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography caused by hip endoprostheses using a physics-based approach. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:747-754.
6. Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45(suppl 1):S4-S10. (Pubitemid 36206495)
7. De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Sverzellati N, et al. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the shoulder: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:540-549.
8. Kyriakou Y, Struffert T, Dorfler A, et al. Basic principles of flat detector computed tomography (FD-CT) in German. Radiologe. 2009;49:811-819.
9. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2767-2779. (Pubitemid 47603972)
10. Struffert T, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Kloska S, et al. Flat detector CT in the evaluation of brain parenchyma, intracranial vasculature, and cerebral blood volume: a pilot study in patients with acute symptoms of cerebral ischemia. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1462-1469.
11. Penzkofer T, Isfort P, Bruners P, et al. Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2656-2662.
12. Struffert T, Richter G, Engelhorn T, et al. Visualisation of intracerebral haemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:619-625.
13. Suzuki S, Yamaguchi I, Kidouchi T, et al. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:376-382.
14. Phan CM, Macklin EA, Bredella MA, et al. Trabecular structure analysis using C-arm CT: comparison with MDCT and flat-panel volume CT. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:1065-1072.
15. Walsh CJ, Phan CM, Misra M, et al. Women with anorexia nervosa: finite element and trabecular structure analysis by using flat-panel volume CT. Radiology. 2010;257:167-174.
16. Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260:454-462.
17. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-220.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
19. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1809-1817.
20. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology. 2005;237:945-951. (Pubitemid 41636385)
21. Primak AN, McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, et al. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics. 2006;26:1785-1794.
22. Matsubara K, Koshida K, Suzuki M, et al. Effective dose evaluation of multidetector CT examinations: influence of the ICRP recommendation in 2007. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2855-2861.
23. Kikuchi T. New proposal and problems for radiological protection by new ICRP recommendation in Japanese. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2002;58:330-335.
24. Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I, et al. Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology. 2009;250:545-550.