Drift load in populations of small size and low density

Heredity

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 296-302

  Willi, Y ^a   Griffin, P ^a   Van Buskirk, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

conservation genetics; genetic drift; genetic load; inbreeding depression; mutation accumulation; population size

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; DICOTYLEDON; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LONG-TERM CHANGE; MUTATION; OUTCROSSING; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION SIZE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOTE; MUTATION; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION;

ARABIDOPSIS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRID VIGOR; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MUTATION; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA;

EID: 84873989879     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.86     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Armbruster WS, Reed DH (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
2. Assaf M, Mobilia M (2011). Fixation of a deleterious allele under mutation pressure and finite selection intensity. J Theor Biol 275: 93-103.
3. Bataillon T, Kirkpatrick M (2000). Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet Res 75: 75-81.
4. Blacket MJ, Robin C, Good RT, Lee SF, Miller AD (2012). Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments-an efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Mol Ecol Res 12: 456-463.
5. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999). Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30: 479-513.
6. Carson HL (1975). The genetics of speciation at the diploid level. Am Nat 109: 83-92.
7. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J (2009). Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 100: 106-113.
8. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001-2014.
9. Coutellec MA, Caquet T (2011). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in bottlenecked populations: a test in the hermaphroditic freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. J Evol Biol 24: 2248-2257.
10. Crow JF (1970). Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection. In: Kojima K (ed.). Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics. Springer: Berlin, pp 128-177.
11. Crow JF (1987). Muller, Dobzhansky, and overdominance. J Hist Biol 20: 351-380.
12. Crow JF (2000). The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet 1: 40-47.
13. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Burgess: Minneapolis, MN, USA.
14. Ebert D, Haag C, Kirkpatrick M, Riek M, Hottinger JW, Pajunan VI et al. (2002). A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation. Science 295: 485-488.
15. Escobar JS, Nicot A, David P (2008). The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta. Genetics 180: 1593-1608.
16. Estes S, Lynch M (2003). Rapid fitness recovery in mutationally degraded lines of Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 57: 1022-1030.
17. Frankham R (1995). Conservation genetics. Ann Rev Genet 29: 305-327.
18. Frankham R (2005). Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126: 131-140.
19. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2003). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
20. Gibbs HL, Grant PR (1989). Inbreeding in Darwin's Medium Ground Finches (Geospiza fortis). Evolution 43: 1273-1284.
21. Glémin S (2003). How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
22. Hartfield M, Keightley PD (2012). Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination. Integ Zool 7: 192-209.
23. Hoffmann AA, Willi Y (2008). Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nat Rev Genet 9: 421-432.
24. Hu TT, Pattyn P, Bakker EG, Cao J, Cheng JF, Clark RM et al. (2011). The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat Genet 43: 476-481.
25. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
26. Johnston MO, Schoen DJ (1994). On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48: 1735-1741.
27. Keightley PD (2012). Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics 190: 295-304.
28. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241.
29. Kimura M (1980). Average time until fixation of a mutant allele in a finite population under continued mutation pressure: studies by analytical, numberical, and pseudo-sampling methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 522-526.
30. Kimura M, Crow JF (1964). The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725-738.
31. Kimura M, Maruyama T, Crow JF (1963). Mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48: 1303-1312.
32. Kirkpatrick M, Jarne P (2000). The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am Nat 155: 154-167.
33. Kristensen TN, Sørensen AC (2005). Inbreeding-lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. Anim Sci 80: 121-133.
34. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
35. Leberg PL, Firmin BD (2008). Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol Ecol 17: 334-343.
36. Lynch M (1991). The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
37. Lynch M, Conery J, Bürger R (1995a). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat 146: 489-518.
38. Lynch M, Conery J, Bürger R (1995b). Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49: 1067-1080.
39. Lynch M, Lande R (1993). Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. In: Kareiva PM, Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (eds). Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, pp 234-250.
40. Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B et al. (1985). Development constraints and evolution. Quart Rev Biol 60: 265-287.
41. Maynard Smith J (1989). Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
42. Miller RG (1968). Jackknifing variances. Ann Math Stat 39: 567-582.
43. Muller HJ (1964). The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 1: 2-9.
44. Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
45. Ohta T, Kimura M (1973). A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res 22: 201-204.
46. Paland S, Schmid B (2003). Population size and the nature of genetic load in Gentianella germanica. Evolution 57: 2242-2251.
47. Pujol B, McKey D (2006). Size asymmetry in intraspecific competition and the density-dependence of inbreeding depression in a natural plant population: a case study in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae). J Evol Biol 19: 85-96.
48. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). GENEPOP version 1.2.: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
49. Saccheri IJ, Brakefield PM (2002). Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B 269: 1073-1078.
50. SAS Institute (2002). SAS OnlineDocs. Version 9. 1SAS Institute: Cary, NC.
51. Singer JD (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Edu Behav Stat 24: 323-355.
52. Templeton AR (1980). The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics 94: 1011-1038.
53. van Treuren R, Bijlsma R, Ouborg NJ, van Delden W (1993). The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. IV. Inbreeding depression and heterosis effects caused by selfing and outcrossing in Scabiosa columbaria. Evolution 47: 1669-1680.
54. Wallace B (1975). Hard and soft selection revisited. Evolution 29: 465-473.
55. Willi Y (2012). Mutational meltdown in selfing Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution. in press.
56. Willi Y, Dietrich S, van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2007a). Inter-specific competitive stress does not affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression. Evol Ecol Res 9: 959-974.
57. Willi Y, Fischer M (2005). Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity 95: 437-443.
58. Willi Y, Hoffmann AA (2009). Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change. J Evol Biol 22: 124-133.
59. Willi Y, Määttänen K (2010). Evolutionary dynamics of mating system shifts in Arabidopsis lyrata. J Evol Biol 23: 2123-2131.
60. Willi Y, Määttänen K (2011). The relative importance of factors determining genetic drift: mating system, spatial genetic structure, habitat and census size in Arabidopsis lyrata. New Phyt 189: 1200-1209.
61. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Fischer M (2005). A threefold genetic Allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Genetics 169: 2255-2265.
62. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006). Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 433-458.
63. Willi Y, van Kleunen M, Dietrich S, Fischer M (2007b). Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proc R Soc B 274: 2357-2364.
64. Winn AA, Elle E, Kalisz S, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Goodwillie C et al. (2011). Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution 65: 3339-3359.
65. Wright S (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
66. Wright S (1982). The shifting balance theory and macroevolution. Ann Rev Genet 16: 1-19.