Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: A key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum?

Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 147-159

  Evans, Sarah F ^a   Chang, Hana ^a   Knothe Tate, Melissa L ^a,b  

^a Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^b Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED MATERIALS; ANATOMICAL LOCATIONS; FIBROUS TISSUE; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MECHANICAL AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES; MECHANO-BIOLOGY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MULTISCALES; POTENTIAL EFFECTS; PROGENITOR CELL; REGENERATIVE CAPACITY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; BONE; CELL CULTURE; INTELLIGENT MATERIALS; TISSUE;

STRESSES;

COLLAGEN FIBER; ELASTIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA3;

BONE BLOOD FLOW; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRENGTH; CAMBIUM; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CORTICAL BONE; DYNAMIC FLUID PRESSURE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PERIOSTEUM; PERIOSTEUM DERIVED CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SHEAR FLOW; SURFACE TENSION; TENSION; TISSUE PRESSURE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; HUMANS; PERIOSTEUM; REGENERATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84873978288     PISSN: 19373368     EISSN: 19373376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0216     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Bishop, G.B.; and Einhorn, T.A. Current and future clinical applications of morphogenetic proteins in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Int Orthop 31, 721, 2007.
2. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States: Musculoskeletal Injuries. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 2008. www.boneandjointburden .org/pdfs/BMUS-chpt6-injuries.pdf
3. Knothe Tate, M.L.; Ritzman, T.F.; Schneider, E.; and Knothe, U.R. Testing of a new one-stage bone-transport surgical procedure exploiting the periosteum for the repair of long-bone defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89, 307, 2007.
4. Alonso, J.E.; and Regazzoni, P. Bridging bone gaps with the Ilizarov technique. Biologic principles. Clin Plast Surg 18, 497, 1991.
5. Knothe, U.R.; and Springfield, D.S. A novel surgical procedure for bridging of massive bone defects. World J Surg Oncol 3, 7, 2005.
6. Oh, C.W.; Song, H.R.; Roh, J.Y.; Oh, J.K.; Min, W.K.; Kyung, H.S.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, P.T.; and Ihn, J.C. Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 801, 2008.
7. Isaksson, H.; Comas, O.; van Donkelaar, C.C.; Mediavilla, J.; Wilson, W.; Huiskes, R.; and Ito, K. Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity. J Biomech 40, 2002, 2007.
8. Vidyadhara, S.; and Rao S.K. A novel approach to juxtaarticular aggressive and recurrent giant cell tumours: resection arthrodesis using bone transport over an intramedullary nail. Int Orthop 31, 179, 2007.
9. Menon, D.K.; Dougall, T.W.; Pool, R.D.; and Simonis, R.B. Augmentative Ilizarov external fixation after failure of diaphyseal union with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 16, 491, 2002.
10. Carrington, N.C.; Smith, R.M.; Knight, S.L.; and Matthews, S.J.E. Ilizarov bone transport over a primary tibial nail and free flap: a new technique for treating Gustilo grade 3b fractures with large segmental defects. Injury 31, 112, 2000.
11. Li, G.; Berven, S.; Athanasou, N.A.; and Simpson, A.H.R.W. Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment. Injury 30, 525, 1999.
12. Knothe, U.R.; Dolejs, S.; Miller, R.M.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect healing. J Biomech 43, 2728, 2010.
13. McBride, S.H.; Dolejs, S.; Brianza, S.; Knothe, U.R.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Net change in periosteal strain during stance shift loading after surgery correlates to rapid de novo bone generation in critically sized defects. Ann Biomed Eng 39, 1570, 2011.
14. McBride, S.H.; Evans, S.F.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation. J Biomech 44, 1954, 2011.
15. Knothe Tate, M.L.; Dolejs, S.; McBride, S.H.; Miller, R.M.; and Knothe, U.R. Multiscale mechanobiology of de novo bone generation, remodeling and adaptation of autograft in a common ovine femur model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4, 829, 2011.
16. Foolen, J.; van Donkelaar, C.C.; Murphy, P.; Huiskes, R.; and Ito, K. Residual periosteum tension is insufficient to modulate bone growth. J Biomech 42, 152, 2009.
17. Foolen, J.; van Donkelaar, C.C.; and Ito, K. Intracellular tension in periosteum/perichondrium cells regulates long bone growth. J Orthop Res 29, 84, 2011.
18. Saris, D.B.F.; Sanyal, A.; An, K.N.; Fitzsimmons, J.S.; and ODriscoll, S.W. Periosteum responds to dynamic fluid pressure by proliferating in vitro. J Orthop Res 17, 668, 1999.
19. Simon, T.M.; Van Sickle, D.C.; Kunishima, D.H.; and Jackson, D.W. Cambium cell stimulation from surgical release of the periosteum. J Orthop Res 21, 470, 2003.
20. Ellender, G.; Feik, S.A.; and Carach, B.J. Periosteal structure and development in a rat caudal vertebra. J Anat 158, 173, 1988.
21. Al-Qtaitat, A.; Shore, R.C.; and Aaron, J.E. Structural changes in the ageing periosteum using collagen III immuno-staining and chromium labeling as indicators. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 10, 112, 2010.
22. Popowics, T.E.; Zhu, Z.; and Herring, S.W. Mechanical properties of the periosteum in the pig, Sus scrofa. Arch Oral Biol 47, 733, 2002.
23. Uchiyama, E.; Yamakoshi, K.; and Sasaki, T. Measurement of mechanical characteristics of tibial periosteum and evaluation of local differences. J Biomech Eng 120, 85, 1998.
24. Knothe Tate, M.L. Smart body armor inspired by flow in bone. Smart Struct Syst 7, 1, 2011.
25. Knothe Tate, M.L.; and Anderson, E.J. Flow directing materials and systems, US Patent No. 12106748, 2008.
26. Mukherjee, S.; and Ganguli, R. A dragonfly inspired flapping wing actuated by electroactive polymers. Smart Struct Syst 6, 867, 2010
27. Knothe Tate, M.L. Top down and bottom up engineering of bone. J Biomech 44, 304, 2011.
28. Evans, S.F.; Parent, J.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Periosteum permeability exhibits mechanically responsive and direction dependent behavior. Trans ORS 36, 1355, 2012.
29. Evans, S.F.; Parent, J.; Lasko, C.; Zhen, C.; Knothe, U.; Lemaire, T.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Periosteum, bones smart bounding membrane, exhibits direction dependent permeability. J Bone Miner Res 2012 Sep 27. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1777.
30. Cao, W.; Cudney, H.H.; and Waser, R. Smart materials and structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 8330, 1999.
31. Moore, S.R.; Milz, S.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Relation of periosteal thickness and cellularity to loading history. Trans ORS 38, 0733, 2013.
32. Brookes, M.; and Revell, W.J. Blood supply of bone. Scientific aspects. Springer Verlag, 1998.
33. Foolen, J.; Van Donkelaar, C.; Nowlan, N.; Murphy, P.; Huiskes, R.; and Ito, K. Collagen orientation in periosteum and perichondrium is aligned with preferential directions of tissue growth. J Orthop Res 26, 1263, 2008.
34. Allen, M.R.; and Burr, D.B. Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone. Bone 36, 311, 2005.
35. Allen, M.R.; Hock, J.M.; and Burr, D.B. Periosteum: biology, regulation and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 35, 1003, 2004.
36. Yiannakopoulos, C.K.; Kanellopoulos, A.D.; Trovas, G.P.; Dontas, I.A.; and Lyritis, G.P. The biomechanical capacity of the periosteum in intact long bones. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 117, 2008.
37. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc K.; Mueller I.; et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8, 315, 2003.
38. Chang, H.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. The periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 1, 480, 2012.
39. Knothe Tate, M.L.; Falls, T.; McBride, S.H.; Atit, R.; and Knothe, U.R. Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40, 2720, 2008.
40. Aubin, J.; and Triffitt, J. Mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblast differentiation. In: Bilezikian, J.; Raisz, L.G.; and Rodan, G.A.; eds. Principles of Bone Biology. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002, p. 59.
41. Zhang, X.; Naik, A.; Xie, C.; Reynolds, D.; Palmer, J.; Lin, A.; Awad, H.; Guldberg, R.; Schwarz, E.; and OKeefe, R. Periosteal stem cells are essential for bone revitalization and repair. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 5, 360, 2005.
42. Knothe Tate, M.L.; Dolejs, S.; Miller, R.M.; and Knothe, U.R. Role of mechanical loading in healing of massive bone autografts. J Orthop Res 28, 1657, 2010.
43. Colnot, C. Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 24, 274, 2009.
44. Evans, S.F.; Docheva, D.; Bernecker, A.; Colnot, C.; Richter, R.P.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Solid supported lipid bilayers as a novel platform to engineer emergence of stem cell fate and tissue architecture using periosteum derived progenitor cells. Biomaterials 234, 1878, 2013.
45. Schneeberger, E.E.; and Lynch, R.D. Structure, function and regulation of cellular tight junctions. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 262, L647, 1992.
46. Li, M.; Amizuka, N.; Oda, K.; Tokunaga, K.; Ito, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Takagi, R.; and Maeda, T. Histochemical evidence of the initial chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in the periosteum of a rib fracture model: implications of osteocyte involvement in periosteal chondrogenesis. Microsc Res Tech 64, 330, 2004.
47. Warnke, P.H.; Douglas, T.; Sivananthan, S.; Wiltfang, J.; Springer, I.; and Becker, S.T. Tissue engineering of periosteal cell membranes in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res 20, 761, 2009.
48. Solchaga, L.A.; Cassiede, P.; and Caplan, A.I. Different response to osteo-inductive agents in bone marrow- and periosteum derived cell preparations. Acta Orthop Scand 69, 426, 1998.
49. Kubo, K.; Att, W.; Yamada, M.; Ohmi, K.; Tsukimura, N.; Suzuki, T.; Maeda, H.; and Ogawa, T. Microtopography of titanium suppresses osteoblastic differentiation but enhances chodroblastic differentiation of rat femoral periosteumderived cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 87A, 380, 2008.
50. Takeuchi, K.; Saruwatari, L.; Nakamura, H.K.; Yang, J.M.; and Ogawa, T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 72A, 296, 2004.
51. Merritt, F.; Erinc, A.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Periosteum regenerates on periosteum-denuded, transported bone segment. Trans ORS 36, 1570, 2012.
52. Agata, H.; Ashahina, I.; and Yamazaki, Y. Effective bone engineering with periosteum derived cells. J Dent Res 86, 79, 2007.
53. Hayashi, O.; Katsube, Y.; and Hirose, M. Comparison of osteogenic ability of rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, periosteum and adipose tissue. Calcif Tissue Int 82, 238, 2008.
54. Tarng, Y.W.; Casper, M.E.; Fitzsimmons, J.S.; Stone, J.J.; Bekkers, J.; An, K.N.; Su, F.C.; ODriscoll, S.W.; and Reinholz, G.G. Direstional fluid flow enhances in vitro periosteal tissue growth and chondrogenesis on poly-ecaprolactone scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 95, 156, 2010.
55. Amsdorf, E.J.; Jones, L.M.; Carter, D.R.; and Jacobs, C.R. The periosteum as a cellular source for functional tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 15, 2637, 2009.
56. Matsushima, S.; Isogai, N.; Jacquet, R.; Lowder, E.; Tokui, T.; and Landis, W.J. The nature and role of periosteum in bone and cartilage regeneration. Cells Tissues Organs 194, 320, 2011.
57. Choi, Y.-S.; Noh, S.-E.; Lim, S.-M, et al. Multipotency and growth characteristic of periosteum-derived progenitor cells for chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Biotechnol Lett 30, 593, 2008.
58. Alexander, D.; Schafer, F.; Olbrich, M.; et al. MSCA-1/ TNAP selection of human jaw periosteal cells improves their mineralization capacity. Cell Physiol Biochem 26, 1073, 2010.
59. De Bari, C.; DellAccio, F.; Vanlauwe, J.; et al. Mesenchymal multipotency of adult human periosteal cells demonstrated by single-cell lineage analysis. Arthritis Rheum 54, 1209, 2006.
60. Lim, S.M.; Choi, Y.S.; Shin, H.C.; et al. Isolation of human periosteum-derived progenitor cells using immunophenotypes for chondrogenesis. Biotechnol Lett 27, 607, 2005.
61. McBride, S.H.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Modulation of stem cell shape and fate B: mechanical modulation of cell shape and gene expression. Tissue Eng Part A 14, 1573, 2008.
62. Song, M.J.; Dean, D.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. In situ spatiotemporal mapping of flow fields around seeded stem cells at the subcellular length scale. PLoS One 5, e12796, 2010.
63. Zimmerman, J.A.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Structurefunction relationships in the stem cells mechanical world A: seeding protocols as a means to control shape and fate of live stem cells. Mol Cell Biomech 8, 275, 2011.
64. Chang, H.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Structure-function relationships in the stem cells mechanical world B: emergent anisotropy of the cytoskeleton correlates to volume and shape changing stress exposure. Mol Cell Biomech 8, 297, 2011.
65. Song, M.J.; Brady-Kalnay, S.; Phillips-Mason, P.; Dean, D.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Mapping the mechanome of live stem cells: using a novel method to measure local strain fields in situ at the fluid-cell interface exposed to controlled exogenous forces. Novel methods to decipher the stem cells mechanome. PLoS One 7, e43601, 2012.
66. Anderson, E.J.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Design of tissue engineering scaffolds as delivery devices for mechanical and mechanically modulated signals. Tissue Eng 13, 2525, 2007.
67. Anderson, E.J.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Open access to novel dual flow chamber technology for in vitro cell mechanotransduction, toxicity and pharamacokinetic studies. Biomed Eng Online 6, 46, 2007.
68. Anderson, E.J.; Falls, T.D.; Sorkin, A.M.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. The imperative for controlled mechanical stresses in unraveling cellular mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Biomed Eng Online 5, 27, 2006.
69. Discher, D.E.; Janmey, P.; and Wang, Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 18, 310, 2005.
70. Li, D.; Zhou, J.; Chowdhury, F.; Cheng, J.; Wang, N.; and Wang, F. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med 6, 229, 2011.
71. McBride, S.H.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Modulation of stem cell shape and fate A: the role of density and seeding protocol on nucleus shape and gene expression. Tissue Eng Part A 14, 1561, 2008.
72. Carpenter, R.D.; and Carter, D.R. The mechanobiological effects of periosteal surface loads. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7, 227, 2008.
73. de Mara, C.S.; Sartori, A.R.; Duarte, A.S.; Andrade, A.L.L.; Pedro, M.A.C.; and Coimbra, I.B. Periosteum as a source of mesenchymal stem cells: the effects of TGF-b3 on chondrogenesis. Clinics 66, 487, 2011.
74. Jones, D.B.; Nolte, H.; Scholu bbers, J.G.; Turner, E.; and Veltel, D. Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 12, 101, 1991.
75. Kanno, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ariyoshi, W.; Tsujisawa, T.; Haga, M.; and Nishihara, T. Tensile mechanical strain upregulates Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63, 499, 2005.
76. Costessi, A.; Pines, A.; DAndrea, P, et al. Extracellular nucleotides activate Runx2 in the osteoblast-like HOBIT cell line: a possible molecular link between mechanical stress and osteoblasts response. Bone 36, 418, 2005.
77. Moukoko, D.; Pourquier, D.; Pithioux, M.; and Chabrand, P. Influence of cyclic bending loading on in vivo skeletal tissue regeneration from periosteal origin. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96, 833, 2010.
78. Kanou, M.; Ueno, T.; Kagawa, T.; Fujii, T.; Sakata, Y.; Ishida, N.; Fukunaga, J.; and Sugahara, T. Osteogenic potential of primed periosteum graft in the rat calvarial model. Ann Plast Surg 54, 71, 2005.
79. Reynders, P.; Becker, J.; and Broos, P. The osteogenic potential of free periosteal autografts in tibial fractures with severe soft tissue damage: an experimental study. Acta Orthop Belg 64, 184, 1998.
80. Hsieh, Y.F.; and Turner, C.H. Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 16, 918, 2001.
81. Tami, A.; Nasser, P.; Schaffler, M.B.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. A novel, non-invasive fatigue fracture model of the rat ulna. J Orthop Res 21, 1018, 2003.
82. Bertram, J.E.A.; Polevoy, Y.; and Cullinane, D.M. Mechanics of avian fibrous periosteum: tensile and adhesion properties during growth. Bone 22, 669, 1998
83. Zeng, Y.Y.; Sun, X.P.; Yang, J.; Wu, W.H.; Xu, X.H.; and Yan, Y.P. Mechanical properties of nasal fascia and periosteum. Clin Biomech 18, 760, 2003.
84. Tami, A.; Schaffler, M.B.; and Knothe Tate, M.L. Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bones molecular sieving function. Biorheology 40, 577, 2003.
85. Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.L.; Wan, L.; and Wang, S.K. The study of the feasibility of segmental bone defect repair with tissueengineered bone membrane: a qualitative observation. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 3, 57, 2008.
86. Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Xia, Y.; Liu, J.; He, J.; and Wang, X. Evaluation of immunocompatibility of tissueengineered periosteum. Biomed Mater 6, 015005, 2011.
87. Ma, D.; Yao, H.; Tian, W.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Mao, T.; and Ren, L. Enhancing bone formation by transplantation of a scaffold-free tissue-engineered periosteum in a rabbit model. Clin Oral Implants Res 22, 1193, 2011.
88. Fan, W.; Crawford, R.; and Xiao, Y. Enhancing in vivo vascularized bone formation by cobalt chloridetreated bone marrow stromal cells in a tissue engineered periosteum model. Biomaterials 31, 3580, 2010.
89. Schonmeyr, B.; Clavin, N.; Avraham, T.; Longo, V.; and Mehrara, B.J. Synthesis of a tissue-engineered periosteum with acellular dermal matrix and cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng A 15, 1833, 2009.
90. Puelacher, W.C.; Vacanti, J.P.; Ferraro, N.F.; Schloo, B.; and Vacanti, C.A. Femoral shaft reconstruction using tissueengineered growth of bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25, 223, 1996.
91. Keskin, M.; Kelly, C.P.; Moreira-Gonzalez, A.; Lobocki, C.; Yarim, M.; Kaplan, S.; and Jackson, I.T. Repairing criticalsized rat calvarial defects with a periosteal cell-seeded small intestinal submucosal layer. Plast Reconstr Surg 122, 400, 2008.
92. Gassling, V.; Douglas, T.; Warnke, P.H.; Acil, Y.; Wiltfang, J.; and Becker, S.T. Platelet-rich fibrin membranes as scaffolds for periosteal tissue engineering. Clin Oral Implants Res 21, 543, 2010.
93. Perka, C.; Schultz, O.; Spitzer, R.S.; Lindenhayn, K.; Burmester, G.R.; and Sittinger, M. Segmental bone repair by tissue-engineered periosteal cell transplants with bioresorbable fleece and fibrin scaffolds in rabbits. Biomaterials 21, 1145, 2000.
94. Arnold, U.; Lindenhayn, K.; and Perka, C. In vitro-cultivation of human periosteum derived cells in bioresorbable polymer-TCP composites. Biomaterials 23, 2303, 2002.
95. Ribeiro, F.V.; Suaid, F.F.; Gonzales, K.; Ruiz, S.; Rodrigues, T.L.; Carvalho, M.D.; Nociti, F.H.; Sallum, E.A.; and Casati, M.Z. Peri-implant reconstruction using autologous periosteum-derived cells and guided bone regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 37, 1128, 2010.
96. Kawase, T.; Okuda, K.; Kogami, H.; Nakayama, H.; Nagata, M.; Sato, T.; Wolff, L.F.; and Yoshie, H. Human periosteum-derived cells combined with superporous hydroxyapatite blocks used as an osteogenic bone substitute for periodontal regenerative therapy: an animal implantation study using nude mice. J Periodontol 81, 420, 2010.
97. Yamamiya, K.; Okuda, K.; Kawase, T.; Hata, K.; Wolff, L.F.; and Yoshie, H. Tissue-engineered cultured periosteum used with platelet-rich plasma and hydroxyapatite in treating human osseous defects. J Periodontol 79, 811, 2008.
98. Knothe Tate, M.L.; Chang, H.; Moore, S.R.; and Knothe, U.R. Surgical membranes as directional delivery devices to generate tissue: testing in an ovine critical sized defect model. PLoS One 6, e28702, 2011.
99. Kawase, T.; Tanaka, T.; Nishimoto, T.; Okuda, K.; Nagata, M.; Burns, D.M.; and Yoshie, H. Improved adhesion of human cultured periosteal sheets to a porous poly(L-lactic acid) membrane scaffold without the aid of exogenous adhesion biomolecules. J Biomed Mater Res A 98A, 100, 2011.
100. Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Hah, Y.S.; Park, B.W.; Kim, D.R.; Rho, G.Y.; Maeng, G.H.; Jeon, R.H.; Lee, H.C.; Kim, J.R.; Kim, G.C.; Kim, U.K.; and Byun, J.H. Tissue- engineered bone formation using periosteal-derived cells and polydioxanone/pluronic F127 scaffold with preseeded adipose tissue-derived CD146 positive endothelial cells. Biomaterials 32, 5033, 2011.
101. Hutmacher, D.W.; and Sittinger, M. Periosteal cells in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 9S, S45, 2003.
102. Reichert, J.C.; Cipitria, A.; Epari, D.R.; et al. A tissue engineering solution for segmental defect regeneration in loadbearing long bones. Sci Transl Med 4, 4, 2012.